• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Auto Insider review

  • Thread starter Thread starter VOORHEES
  • Start date Start date Oct 6, 2004

VOORHEES

Stangnet's "35th Limited Edition" VIN Guy
15 Year Member
Nov 9, 1999
3,046
36
119
LaGrange, GA
Oct 6, 2004
#1
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #1
http://www.detnews.com/2004/autosconsumer/0410/06/g03-294511.htm

Seems they like it, but hate it.
I don't get some auto writers sometimes, They are too "middle of the road" for me.
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Oct 6, 2004
#2
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #2
Well I for one am glad ford didnt put rear air bags, IRS, etc on the new stang. People dont buy mustangs for the rear seat room. Hell they sell rear seat delete kits. Maybe an IRS option would have been a good idea but I for one wouldnt have checked that box. The solid rear might be old tech but it work and if it aint broke.

$25K for 300hp is down right cheap. Ford did a great job with the new stang and I will be in line for my 2006 or 2007 GT once all the first year bugs are all worked out and all the crazy people who will pay thousdands over sticker already bought theirs so I can get a reasonable deal.
 
A

AirForge

New Member
Apr 22, 2002
44
0
0
NC
Oct 6, 2004
#3
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #3
I find that disturbing. This test didnt even mention any kind of performance figures. They complained about things like the lack of rear seat room, rear airbags and stability control... in a MUSTANG. It seems like they expect this mustang to ride like a BMW.
 
M

Matt Gruber

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
50
0
0
New Smyrna Beach FL
Oct 6, 2004
#4
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #4
an honest review at last! kudos!
maybe stability control in 06? i'd pay $500 for it. my butt is worth it!
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Oct 6, 2004
#5
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #5
That was the gayest review ever. The whole witty banter between husband and wife was moronic.
 

holler

Founding Member
Dec 5, 2000
332
0
0
Chicago
Oct 6, 2004
#6
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #6
the car is a 2+2, the back seats are made for neccessity and storage only, not luxury. People are so stupid somtimes. It's like complaining the backseat of a porsche 911 is small. they just don't get it.

rear seat airbags, wtf!!!! :banghead:
 
1

1967fast

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
9
0
0
Oct 6, 2004
#7
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #7
It is their job to comment on the positives and negatives of the car. They must be doing pretty good or else they wouldn't be in business. Not saying just about this review, but about all reviews. People begin to complain because MotorTrend said "has ford taken this retro thing to far" talking about the rear axel, even though they later go on to compliment it about being very nice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Inheriting (and likely restoration of) a 1965 Mustang
  • miniwheats235
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
234
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2026
Realmongo
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
748
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
316
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
901
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?