• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

B303 And Bbk Ssi Omfg

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88LX5.Oh
  • Start date Start date Oct 12, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Oct 16, 2012
#41
  • Oct 16, 2012
  • #41
88LX5.Oh said:
Well since everyone was saying I needed lower gears, gonna put 3.73's in my new rear end.
A while back we scrapped out an Explorer Sport. 8.8 out back and on the tag said 3L73 as the first four letters. It was a low mileage Explorer (junk engine and body) so they should be good. My dad will be setting it up for me since I've never done any gear swaps before. Free mods FTW!
Click to expand...

Very Nice!
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Oct 16, 2012
#42
  • Oct 16, 2012
  • #42
Once you get that new rear end swapped in, come back and tell us how much it changed your opinion of the car. I bet you are pleased.
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Oct 16, 2012
#43
  • Oct 16, 2012
  • #43
95BlueStallion said:
Once you get that new rear end swapped in, come back and tell us how much it changed your opinion of the car. I bet you are pleased.
Click to expand...
Well the thing is, I haven't been able to drive it really good yet :/
only times I drove it other than pulling it out of my shop was when I was taking it to the exhaust shop. It was still speed density then and I had my HCI swap completed. Ran so terrible I wanted to give up on the car. So anything is an improvement over that lol
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Oct 16, 2012
#44
  • Oct 16, 2012
  • #44
Well shi t, if you havent even done a mass air conversion and driven it when its running correctly, then I know you will be pleased!
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 17, 2012
#45
  • Oct 17, 2012
  • #45
I dunno...

I know that there are better parts out there, but it's all about cubic dollars, isn't it?
The combo looks nice enough to me.
The only way I see it as 'mismatched' is if lower gears (higher numerically) are not used.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 17, 2012
#46
  • Oct 17, 2012
  • #46
I'd like to point out to everyone something I have been preaching for years...

The 289/302 was a revolutionary engine for it's time due to it's oversquare bore/stroke.
It is a very short stroke, matched to a relatively large bore. It is NOT designed to make low end torque.
To try and build it like it is a conventional engine to operate at lower rpms is just a waste of time.
The strength of this specific engine is in it's want/ability/need to rev!
Just because you move the powerband up in the rpm range does not mean you are losing torque.
You can gain torque while moving the power up in the rpm scale!
Don't sell the SBF short by building it like it was a brand-x engine!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Oct 17, 2012
#47
  • Oct 17, 2012
  • #47
ratio411 said:
I'd like to point out to everyone something I have been preaching for years...

The 289/302 was a revolutionary engine for it's time due to it's oversquare bore/stroke.
It is a very short stroke, matched to a relatively large bore. It is NOT designed to make low end torque.
To try and build it like it is a conventional engine to operate at lower rpms is just a waste of time.
The strength of this specific engine is in it's want/ability/need to rev!
Just because you move the powerband up in the rpm range does not mean you are losing torque.
You can gain torque while moving the power up in the rpm scale!
Don't sell the SBF short by building it like it was a brand-x engine!
Click to expand...

Aren't pretty much all mainstream pushrod V8s oversquare?

Food for thought- the 7000 RPM Coyote is actually slightly undersquare.

I agree though, people shouldn't be afraid to build 302s to rev a little!
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Oct 17, 2012
#48
  • Oct 17, 2012
  • #48
So today I took the cover off the Explorer rear end and found that the carrier had a luctor wheel built onto it for the wheel speed sensor that's on the rear end. Dad said the gear set MIGHT not work for me since I have a different carrier style.

Has anybody ran into this before and do you know if I can still use these gears?
If I can't use them, I'll just use some 3.55's I have laying around.

Oh and another question, the Explorer had the VSS on the transfer case and I thought "Oh I'll just take the gear off of it and use for my transmission since it's matched for the 3.73's" well it was a different color than the one I bought through LMR for my 3.27's, but they BOTH had 19 teeth. Any thoughts on this?
Explorer one was orange and the LMR one was Pink,IIRC.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 18, 2012
#49
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #49
NIKwoaC said:
Aren't pretty much all mainstream pushrod V8s oversquare?

Food for thought- the 7000 RPM Coyote is actually slightly undersquare.

I agree though, people shouldn't be afraid to build 302s to rev a little!
Click to expand...

Point was that the 289/302 was the poineer of this type of engine, but now (much later) it has become a sort of norm.
That said, the building techniques of the hot rod world that you still hear parrotted today are based on engines that are not as oversquare, if at all. That is what I was getting at. The car magazines and later shows on cable all still tell you the way to build ANY engine for the street is to focus squarely on the low end torque. They don't tell you that the 289/302 is the obvious exception to this rule of theirs.

However, I will say that they give the LSx engines (based heavily on the best of Ford designs) an outright pass on their rule. (You can actually put LSx heads on a Windsor/Cleveland block!)

Btw: I'd have an LSx derivative over the Coyote anyday.
(The Coyote is not a pushrod engine, is it?)
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 18, 2012
#50
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #50
88LX5.Oh said:
So today I took the cover off the Explorer rear end and found that the carrier had a luctor wheel built onto it for the wheel speed sensor that's on the rear end. Dad said the gear set MIGHT not work for me since I have a different carrier style.

Has anybody ran into this before and do you know if I can still use these gears?
If I can't use them, I'll just use some 3.55's I have laying around.

Oh and another question, the Explorer had the VSS on the transfer case and I thought "Oh I'll just take the gear off of it and use for my transmission since it's matched for the 3.73's" well it was a different color than the one I bought through LMR for my 3.27's, but they BOTH had 19 teeth. Any thoughts on this?
Explorer one was orange and the LMR one was Pink,IIRC.
Click to expand...

Well, for the speedo gears, there are different designs, and that might account for the different colors.
Example, T5 speedo gears are not interchangeable with AODs, and C4 gears are not interchangeable with Toploaders.
The transfer case may use a gear that is not interchangeable, or it might be one that is not interchangeable with the transmission you have.
Some are tricky too, like the C4 and Toploader speedo gears. You can't tell them apart at a glance. However, one has the teeth cut in one direction, and the teeth are cut in the opposite direction on the other. You won't see that unless you are looking for it. So don't assume it should be the same gear that you need.

The reluctor should be on your existing Fox rear end too. I don't see a problem.
I would say that you can just swap carriers too, but I believe the Exploder will be 31 spline.
If the Exploder has a limited slip, you might check the spline count. If it's 28, it'll swap too if that is what you want.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 18, 2012
#51
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #51
Duh, I wasn't thinking....

The reluctor gear shouldn't matter if you are not changing carriers.
The gear is not changed for the reluctor, but the thickness of the flange on the diff is thinner by the thickness of the reluctor.
The net result is that the ring gear is the same and mounted to a flange of the same thickness. Make sense?
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Oct 18, 2012
#52
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #52
ratio411 said:
Point was that the 289/302 was the poineer of this type of engine, but now (much later) it has become a sort of norm.
That said, the building techniques of the hot rod world that you still hear parrotted today are based on engines that are not as oversquare, if at all. That is what I was getting at. The car magazines and later shows on cable all still tell you the way to build ANY engine for the street is to focus squarely on the low end torque. They don't tell you that the 289/302 is the obvious exception to this rule of theirs.

However, I will say that they give the LSx engines (based heavily on the best of Ford designs) an outright pass on their rule. (You can actually put LSx heads on a Windsor/Cleveland block!)

Btw: I'd have an LSx derivative over the Coyote anyday.
(The Coyote is not a pushrod engine, is it?)
Click to expand...

Alright, I'm playing devil's advocate here. But the small block Chevy, which was released almost 10 years prior to the small block Ford, was always oversquare. In fact, Chevy released the SBC 302 (4x3) one year before Ford released theirs.

 
Reactions: gearheadboy

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 18, 2012
#53
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #53
I guess I am generalizing too much.
The ratio of oversquare was on the extreme.
And yes, the 302 Chevy was known for it's lack of torque, but great RPM abilities.
It's not so much the 302 either, but the 289, that is the 'poineer'. I generalized there again too.
The rod ratio is also great on the 289, for what it's worth, if you like long rods and rev happy engines.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Oct 18, 2012
#54
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #54
I robbed a 31 spline carrier from an Explorer for my car earlier this year. If you are referring to the ring that has all the little teeth on it (kinda like a flywheel), it is attached to the carrier. Remove the gears from the carrier, then apply a little heat to the ring. Then use a hammer, rubber or steel, and start tapping the ring from all sides. It will pop right off. It will be a little stuck on there after all these years, but once the ring gear is off, there is nothing holding it on but a little friction. Throw it in the scrap pile and enjoy your gears and 31 spline carrier if you so desire. FYI, I rebuilt mine with the carbon fiber rebuild kit for $107...got the carrier for free.

Joe
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Oct 18, 2012
#55
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #55
ratio411 said:
Duh, I wasn't thinking....

The reluctor gear shouldn't matter if you are not changing carriers.
The gear is not changed for the reluctor, but the thickness of the flange on the diff is thinner by the thickness of the reluctor.
The net result is that the ring gear is the same and mounted to a flange of the same thickness. Make sense?
Click to expand...
THIS.
Lol thank you. Got it all apart today and probably gonna take my new rear end apart sometime tomorrow and have my dad set up the gears. I'm also going to try to make the Explorer brake lines work with my rear end. It'll take some bending but oh well
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Oct 18, 2012
#56
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #56
RangerJoe said:
I robbed a 31 spline carrier from an Explorer for my car earlier this year. If you are referring to the ring that has all the little teeth on it (kinda like a flywheel), it is attached to the carrier. Remove the gears from the carrier, then apply a little heat to the ring. Then use a hammer, rubber or steel, and start tapping the ring from all sides. It will pop right off. It will be a little stuck on there after all these years, but once the ring gear is off, there is nothing holding it on but a little friction. Throw it in the scrap pile and enjoy your gears and 31 spline carrier if you so desire. FYI, I rebuilt mine with the carbon fiber rebuild kit for $107...got the carrier for free.

Joe
Click to expand...
I might actually do this! Or I may leave the ring on it just in case I need a carrier someday for something that uses the reluctor wheel
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Oct 19, 2012
#57
  • Oct 19, 2012
  • #57

Installed and ready to go
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 20, 2012
#58
  • Oct 20, 2012
  • #58
Rock and roll. while those parts arent going to set the streets on fire they are perfectly suited for a mild street car. As long as the bbk isnt leaking I dont see how you can go wrong.
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 21, 2012
#59
  • Oct 21, 2012
  • #59
RangerJoe said:
I robbed a 31 spline carrier from an Explorer for my car earlier this year. If you are referring to the ring that has all the little teeth on it (kinda like a flywheel), it is attached to the carrier. Remove the gears from the carrier, then apply a little heat to the ring. Then use a hammer, rubber or steel, and start tapping the ring from all sides. It will pop right off. It will be a little stuck on there after all these years, but once the ring gear is off, there is nothing holding it on but a little friction. Throw it in the scrap pile and enjoy your gears and 31 spline carrier if you so desire. FYI, I rebuilt mine with the carbon fiber rebuild kit for $107...got the carrier for free.

Joe
Click to expand...
What did you do for axles?
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Oct 21, 2012
#60
  • Oct 21, 2012
  • #60
Fox Length 31 Spline. They are after market. I can't remember the brand name of them, but they are made by Motive Gear. I think they were TenFactory Axles. They are supposed to have a 10 year replacement warranty...we will see how good that is if I ever break one.

Joe
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
266
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
79
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
HP woes with Sniper Sytem
  • Stang_1973
  • Mar 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
870
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 13, 2025
revhead347
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
760
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?