• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

back from track (density altitude lesson)

  • Thread starter Thread starter bhuff30
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2009

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Sep 17, 2009
#1
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • #1
Ever come back from the track after making some changes to the car, and wonder what the heck happen? Why are you SLOWER?!

I'm back from the track. I only got to make 2 passes, and they were both slower than my previous best. I ran 14.456@94.43mph which is slower than the time in my signature by 2 mph and several tenths. But how's that possible? I added underdrive pullies, and drop in K&N, nitto drag radials and lost that much? That's why you have to calculate the density altitude!

The DA last night was 2100. Not that great. The DA when I ran the 14.26 was -600! My track is at 800' elevation, but with cold air and rediculously high pressure, the DA dropped to -600. So adding correction factors (can be found from NHRA) I actually gained .260 seconds and 1 mph.

So there you have it. Under drive pullies and a drop in K&N are worth about 1mph.

The car has more to give, but I had some other issues. First, the clutch is getting a bit soft. It doesn't grab hard enough these days, and on a really hard 3500+rpm launch, the rpms won't drop to 3500. They'll hang around 4000-4500 until the speed cetches up, even though the clutch is all they way out. It also took longer than normal for the rpms to drop after a hard power shift. So note to self: don't abuse clutch until replaced!
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Sep 17, 2009
#2
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • #2
DA is my worst enemy!!! my best run from last saterday was a 12.81 with a 3100+ DA!!!!

alot of people dont under stand that a bad DA can slow you down by 2 or 3 tenths EASY!!!
 
B

Barnaby

Founding Member
Dec 2, 1999
596
0
0
Albuquerque, NM
Sep 17, 2009
#3
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • #3
I envy your DAs. Last time I ran the DA was over 8000ft.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Sep 17, 2009
#4
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • #4
Barnaby said:
I envy your DAs. Last time I ran the DA was over 8000ft.
Click to expand...

thats sucks... talk about 12 second cars running 15's
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Sep 17, 2009
#5
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • #5
Exactly why I posted this. I can't count the number of times someone has posted up "my car ran slower, even though I added XXX parts". Or the classic case of what the magazines publish vs what you can actually do in the real world. Weather is not perfect in the real world.

I had a guy with a new SS camaro at the track last night telling me expects to run low 12s with a tune, and deep 12s as it sits bone stock. I then watched him run a series of 13.4 and worse times... and with the worst track manners I've ever seen. He stayed in the gas after the finish line to try to pass my friend after losing.


98COBRA281 said:
DA is my worst enemy!!! my best run from last saterday was a 12.81 with a 3100+ DA!!!!

alot of people dont under stand that a bad DA can slow you down by 2 or 3 tenths EASY!!!
Click to expand...
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Sep 17, 2009
#6
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • #6
Good post.

I have never ran my car in ideal conditions.

It's either been stupid hot AND humid, or cool weather but a ton of moisture in the air.

I would love to hit the track with a nice day, and since the tracks around me are right around sea level, weather is really the only thing for me to worry about.
 

Pearl02

Member
Nov 27, 2004
496
0
16
Kansas City
Sep 18, 2009
#7
  • Sep 18, 2009
  • #7
bhuff30 said:
Exactly why I posted this. I can't count the number of times someone has posted up "my car ran slower, even though I added XXX parts". Or the classic case of what the magazines publish vs what you can actually do in the real world. Weather is not perfect in the real world.

I had a guy with a new SS camaro at the track last night telling me expects to run low 12s with a tune, and deep 12s as it sits bone stock. I then watched him run a series of 13.4 and worse times... and with the worst track manners I've ever seen. He stayed in the gas after the finish line to try to pass my friend after losing.
Click to expand...

Did you run at Topeka? Pearl02.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Sep 18, 2009
#8
  • Sep 18, 2009
  • #8
KCIR

Pearl02 said:
Did you run at Topeka? Pearl02.
Click to expand...
 
G

GettinThere

Member
Jul 29, 2005
553
1
19
Central Texas
Sep 18, 2009
#9
  • Sep 18, 2009
  • #9
bhuff30 said:
He stayed in the gas after the finish line to try to pass my friend after losing.
Click to expand...

What a douche, he needs to be banned from the track.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Sep 19, 2009
#10
  • Sep 19, 2009
  • #10
Brian, how is the car getting out of the hole with the nittos? Can you post up the full runs of each with 60fts if you have them?

A while back when I was doing my write up on my 97, the pulleys were worth close to .2 and 1mph if I can recall when I ran at the same track, similar 60ft's and DA's. I doubt the KN helped any, though. Was there any signs of the clutch slipping at the top end of the track, or did it stick or feel like jello after any runs?

What's weird is, tonight I trapped an identical MPH that I did last year, but with 1000ft more elevation, and no mods. I'm still looking at the runs and weather to try and figure out why.

DA does play a huge factor though, great info for those getting into drag racing.

Mark
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Sep 19, 2009
#11
  • Sep 19, 2009
  • #11
You guys ever want to see C6 Z06's run 13's and even 14's? Come to west Texas. DA is a major killer.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Sep 20, 2009
#12
  • Sep 20, 2009
  • #12
Mark,

The first pass, I bogged down a bit. Probably surprised by the traction of the nittos. I held 2500 rpm on the launch and with the shallow 3.27 gave me a poor 60':
60 2.221
330 6.164
1/8 9.428 @ 75.34
1000 12.241
1/4 14.623 @ 94.77

Here's the best time I made with the nittos on. On launch, was slipping the clutch from high rpms, and the clutch was slipping steadily at 4500 until I gained enough speed. I would rather slip it from 3500, but the clutch just couldn't pull the rpms down because of the engines momentum:
60 2.120
330 6.000
1/8 9.261 @ 75.37
1000 12.073
1/4 14.456 @ 94.43

The clutch holds fine in high gears and even at 100 mph. The problem is when at full throttle, the engine has enough momentum, it takes a little time to bring the engine rpms down. It would usually bark 2nd, but powershifting 3rd and 4th would take about 2/10ths of a second for the rpms to drop to where they should be. It should be an instant drop in rpms if the clutch is strong. The pedal never really felt mushy, like I was overheating it, but it has a limited life now. It has 75k miles, 30 full passes, and countless daily street abuse.

Winters98GT said:
Brian, how is the car getting out of the hole with the nittos? Can you post up the full runs of each with 60fts if you have them?

A while back when I was doing my write up on my 97, the pulleys were worth close to .2 and 1mph if I can recall when I ran at the same track, similar 60ft's and DA's. I doubt the KN helped any, though. Was there any signs of the clutch slipping at the top end of the track, or did it stick or feel like jello after any runs?

What's weird is, tonight I trapped an identical MPH that I did last year, but with 1000ft more elevation, and no mods. I'm still looking at the runs and weather to try and figure out why.

DA does play a huge factor though, great info for those getting into drag racing.

Mark
Click to expand...
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Sep 20, 2009
#13
  • Sep 20, 2009
  • #13
try launching a little higher, with my M/T, i leave at 4000-4500prms, and just dump it, even with my power level and 4.30's it still almost wants to bog, but i have cut plenty of 1.7 60's.....
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Sep 20, 2009
#14
  • Sep 20, 2009
  • #14
The last run, I didn't dump the clutch, but I did let it out very aggressively and fast. That run, the clutch was slipping right at 4500 until the speed of the car caught up. Maybe if I actually dumped the clutch, it would have grabbed and allowed a little tire spin, and put the power to the ground instead of making heat in the clutch. Playing around on the street, I did get tire spin on one launch with the nittos. It was damn fun too! It's amazing how fast the shift to 2nd gear comes, even with 3.27 gears.

Anyway, I don't much feel like replacing the clutch *quite* yet, so it is easy driving for a while. Long as I don't launch above 3500 or powershift, the clutch shows no signs of weakness.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Sep 20, 2009
#15
  • Sep 20, 2009
  • #15
Brian,

Thanks man. I know you have quite a bit of track experience, so I am sure you will get that sixty foot down and nail your goals. Have you tried dumping the clutch and getting some wheel spin? Some times, it works better for me working backwards. See where the car spins and use a little spin to your advantage, and see how much you need to slip it. What PSI are you running?

BTW, how is the 4banger running?

bhuff30 said:
Mark,

The first pass, I bogged down a bit. Probably surprised by the traction of the nittos. I held 2500 rpm on the launch and with the shallow 3.27 gave me a poor 60':
60 2.221
330 6.164
1/8 9.428 @ 75.34
1000 12.241
1/4 14.623 @ 94.77

Here's the best time I made with the nittos on. On launch, was slipping the clutch from high rpms, and the clutch was slipping steadily at 4500 until I gained enough speed. I would rather slip it from 3500, but the clutch just couldn't pull the rpms down because of the engines momentum:
60 2.120
330 6.000
1/8 9.261 @ 75.37
1000 12.073
1/4 14.456 @ 94.43

The clutch holds fine in high gears and even at 100 mph. The problem is when at full throttle, the engine has enough momentum, it takes a little time to bring the engine rpms down. It would usually bark 2nd, but powershifting 3rd and 4th would take about 2/10ths of a second for the rpms to drop to where they should be. It should be an instant drop in rpms if the clutch is strong. The pedal never really felt mushy, like I was overheating it, but it has a limited life now. It has 75k miles, 30 full passes, and countless daily street abuse.
Click to expand...
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Sep 21, 2009
#16
  • Sep 21, 2009
  • #16
Next time I'm out, I'll try dumping it. It is my daily driver, so I probably won't take it out again for a year or more; I need that car. I definately know what you are saying about a little wheel spin helping. I was running 16psi in the tires on those runs since it worked well on the 4cyl. I was planning to make a 3rd run, at 29psi in the tires, trying to encourage a bit of wheelspin and help my mph from less rolling resistance, but the track got oiled down at the top end before I could run. I didn't feel like waiting an hour and a half, so I left.

The 4cyl is still broken. Last time out, I ran a 12.36 and cracked a cylinder wall in the process. I was expecting a blown head gasket... it was running on 3cyls and mixing coolant/oil, but no such luck. I found a 6" long crack in the #2 cylinder. The problem is, I'm running the NA block and boring .030 over. The next engine will probably get partially filled and/or standard sized pistons. But I'm not sure if and when I can get it back together. I may just get a stock turbo shortblock for 150$ and throw it together for some more cheap fun.


Winters98GT said:
Brian,

Thanks man. I know you have quite a bit of track experience, so I am sure you will get that sixty foot down and nail your goals. Have you tried dumping the clutch and getting some wheel spin? Some times, it works better for me working backwards. See where the car spins and use a little spin to your advantage, and see how much you need to slip it. What PSI are you running?

BTW, how is the 4banger running?
Click to expand...
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Sep 21, 2009
#17
  • Sep 21, 2009
  • #17
Sounds great man! I'm sorry that the turbo is still down. You came such a long way in that thing, but $150 bucks for a shortblock and low 12 second fun seems like a good idea to me. Good luck, let me know how it turns out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
441
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 16, 2026
FastDriver
Engine Today I found air leaks on 2 different IAC's which caused erratic idle issues.
  • CAMTWO1070
  • Oct 15, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2022
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?