G Green_Meanie New Member Mar 11, 2004 161 0 0 Jun 8, 2004 #1 Jun 8, 2004 #1 What are the differences in the balancers? What is advantageous of going with an SFI over a stock unit?
What are the differences in the balancers? What is advantageous of going with an SFI over a stock unit?
Mrgreen94gt SIMMA DA NA!!! Founding Member Jul 16, 2002 448 0 0 West TN Jun 8, 2004 #2 Jun 8, 2004 #2 There's no rubber to wear out on the SFI ones and they are steel instead of cast iron. Plus, they look nice.
There's no rubber to wear out on the SFI ones and they are steel instead of cast iron. Plus, they look nice.
GTPhreak Founding Member Mar 16, 2000 5,505 0 77 Rowlett, TEXAS Jun 8, 2004 #3 Jun 8, 2004 #3 they do have the elastimer bond in them. you just dont have to worry about it falling apart like a stocker
they do have the elastimer bond in them. you just dont have to worry about it falling apart like a stocker
9 94stang-lover New Member Jan 18, 2004 62 0 0 Jun 8, 2004 #4 Jun 8, 2004 #4 the rubber on the stock balancer always go bad specially if u rev ur car close to 6000 rpm. i already change it twice and finally went with a sfi one. check the photos Attachments 1.webp 22.1 KB · Views: 143 2.webp 30.3 KB · Views: 151
the rubber on the stock balancer always go bad specially if u rev ur car close to 6000 rpm. i already change it twice and finally went with a sfi one. check the photos