• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

BBK Longtubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter stang22
  • Start date Start date Jan 26, 2004

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Jan 26, 2004
#1
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #1
I am rebuilding my motor and doing some other stuff and I am going to get some new long tubes. I have been looking at BBK's (Jet-Hot coated) LT's and wanted to get some different opinions from you guys. The price ranges are between $370.00 to $400.00 or so, give or take a few. Let me know what you think, and if you know of any other places to get them from. Thanks in advance,

Tim

1979-93 5.0 Mustang 1 5-8" Full-Lengths (Jet-Hot) Laser-Cut Flange 369.95
 
G

goldbomb79

Member
Jun 4, 2003
374
0
16
Indiana
Jan 26, 2004
#2
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #2
I've got the bbk full lengths with the short bbk x pipe with mac pro dumps, and i think it's helping my beast breath better, plus it sounds alot better also. not sure about feeling a power increase though, because i put the exhaust on at the same time that i built the motor.
 

HyPer-50

Member
Jun 26, 2003
377
0
16
Woodstock, GA
Jan 27, 2004
#3
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #3
I have BBK LT's with a catted h-pipe, I noticed some low end improvement after switching (previously had hedman shorties). Only complaint I have about em is you really need to watch out when going over speed bumps, it's painful hearing them rub, but I suppose all LT's would be that way heh. Didn't notice too too much difference in sound, but who knows.
 

HyPer-50

Member
Jun 26, 2003
377
0
16
Woodstock, GA
Jan 27, 2004
#4
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #4
Summitt sells the headers I bought, for $240. Part# BBK-1516. I was planning on getting the ceramic ones, but really didn't feel like paying the extra $100 for em, my car isn't a show car lol
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Jan 27, 2004
#5
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #5
I currently have long tubes right now and I am sure the new ones will only compliment my setup. Any install or fitment issues? I don't mind paying the extra for the Jet-Hot coating though. I wouldn't say my car is going to be a show car, but I will show it... if that helps.

If anyone knows a cheaper place to buy them with the Jet Hot coating already, let me know. Thanks!

Tim

I don't have to get BBK LT's, but those are the only ones I found with the Jet Hot coating on them already.
 

HyPer-50

Member
Jun 26, 2003
377
0
16
Woodstock, GA
Jan 27, 2004
#6
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #6
I bought the BBK's for one reason only, my install guy suggested them due to there ease of installation..... LOL he still had to lift the motor to put em on, so be prepared for that.
 

393Bird

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2002
244
0
0
Clarksville Tennessee
Jan 27, 2004
#7
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #7
I wanted them for my 393 Tbird, and gave them a try. I had just finished reworking my K member, and was test fitting the engine with a Canton 7 qt, so stuck them on. They are VERY nice headers, and fit my engine/body fine, but after I checking, they were too close together between the collecters to clear the AOD. I think BBK missed the boat when they did not make these to fit AOD cars also.

Here is my attemp tp fit them in my Tbird
http://www.qsl.net/wd4ngb/birdwork9.htm
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Jan 27, 2004
#8
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #8
HyPer-50 said:
I bought the BBK's for one reason only, my install guy suggested them due to there ease of installation..... LOL he still had to lift the motor to put em on, so be prepared for that.
Click to expand...

I am pulling the motor and tranny to weld-up and paint the engine bay along with some other stuff like re-building the motor. It should be about a 6-8 month project if everything goes right. Not really worried about jacking up the motor though... being it will be on an engine stand for a while.

Tim
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
Jan 27, 2004
#9
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #9
BBKs are great bang for buck headers and longtubes are the way to go. There are other options that are better but they are either much more $$ or are slip fit headers. I know many will come on dispute this but I 'm just not a fan of slip on headers. The BBKs could use a little grinding just inside the mounting flange (where mounts to head) to get rid of extra welds.
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Jan 27, 2004
#10
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #10
90Notch said:
I know many will come on dispute this but I 'm just not a fan of slip on headers.
Click to expand...

I won't dispute it with you, I just took my old slip long tubes off. Although they were very easy to install, when I took them out, I coud tell a few places were leaking that I did not know was leaking.

Tim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
196
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
211
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
799
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
313
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
497
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?