• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

BBK or Accufab?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RoadconeTuning
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2006
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 11, 2006
#1
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #1
for a 75mm TB which one is better the accufab or the BBK unit... i would think they would be EXACTLY the same since they both bolt up to stock stuff and are both 75mm... but we all know that that is never true.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Apr 11, 2006
#2
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #2
I say Accufab.. but i'm biased
 

AmBo

Active Member
Feb 3, 2004
1,027
1
36
New Jersey
Apr 11, 2006
#3
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #3
You will get the accufab guys in here screaming accufab and the BBK guys screaming BBK. Accufab is better, but is it worth the extra bills to you? It's your car and your money in the end.
 

Miles

Founding Member
Aug 14, 2001
1,225
0
0
Burlington, ON
Apr 11, 2006
#4
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #4
AmBo said:
You will get the accufab guys in here screaming accufab and the BBK guys screaming BBK. Accufab is better, but is it worth the extra bills to you? It's your car and your money in the end.
Click to expand...

Good point..









/me screams ACCUFAB
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 11, 2006
#5
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #5
what makes it better? i dont like "its just better" is one actually made using a better process or is one made out of another material or is one made by midgets that are high on coke and using moonbounce shoes to work on them???
 

Miles

Founding Member
Aug 14, 2001
1,225
0
0
Burlington, ON
Apr 11, 2006
#6
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #6
Ok.. well after you've search and read all of the countless threads on this topic, you'll find that there are minimal differences in horsepower. Therefore, the only difference that makes one better than the other is user preference. I prefer accufab because it looks better than the rest and is proven to consistently perform in the top of the pile.

Hence, ACCUFAB :wink:
 

96gt4point6

New Member
Apr 5, 2006
29
0
0
Chesapeake, VA
Apr 11, 2006
#7
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #7
i agree, id go ACCUFAB.
 

loosescrew79

New Member
Dec 18, 2004
313
0
0
Apr 11, 2006
#8
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #8
9 times out 10 you get what you pay for. So if you pay for the most expensive one its usually the better one. Asfar as perfomance and over all quality
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
"but what's with the but shots?"
Apr 11, 2006
#9
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #9
I believe in the 'You get what you pay for' approach but only to a certain extent.

How much better is the Accufab? 7 rwhp vs 8 rwhp? 10 vs 11 rwhp? Even the test on Modular Depot rated them within 1-2 rwhp of each other. Is that extra horsepower worth the extra $200? I'd rather put that $200 towards getting better tires or something.
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 11, 2006
#10
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #10
what if i can get them w/in 30 bucks of eachother...
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
"but what's with the but shots?"
Apr 11, 2006
#11
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #11
Then I'd get the Accufab... and get an extra set for me.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Apr 11, 2006
#12
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #12
why do you want a 75mm tb? upgrading that without an intake upgrade of some kind is not something that is really going to be worth the money.

I would look for flow numbers that will answer you question. I have always heard that accufab is better but I got my plenum and TB of ebay and is is an accufab plenum with with BBK TB. I just like the price I got. a TB is a road hole machined in an oppening with a butterfly. given the same flow I would let my wallet decide. I have had no performance issues with the BBK but I don't have any way of knowing if it performs as well as the accufab. I would be the $130 I saved would offset any 1hp difference there may be.
 

edbo

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
198
0
0
Valley, AL
Apr 11, 2006
#13
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #13
The Accufabs are more expensive but IMO they're worth the extra cost. The polished ones really look great if you're trying to make your engine bay look good too!
 

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Apr 11, 2006
#14
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #14
It's not just about horsepower differences between the units... it's also about build quality. I bought a MAC 75mm TB and within a couple weeks dumped it and bought an Accufab. Big difference in feel on the throttle.
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Apr 11, 2006
#15
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #15
Professional Products 75mm throttle body! I got mine for 100 bucks brand new! Performs great, looks great, is great
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 11, 2006
#16
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #16
its not like im just going to put a TB on and thats it... im just researching things as i go down the line of parts... so if i can get the accufab for not much more then ill get that but if its more than 30-40 bucks more then ill get the BBK...
 

Cantslowdown

New Member
Jun 20, 2004
502
1
0
Mt.Home AR!
Apr 11, 2006
#17
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #17
I am thinking about going with a full BBK kit or Professional Products.So I am kinda be wanting to know my self.
 

mustangman9812

10 Year Member
Jan 14, 2004
661
6
49
Mars Hill, NC
Apr 12, 2006
#18
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #18
I like Professional Products my throttle body
 

Stangsgrl

Member
Mar 13, 2004
132
1
18
Mesa, AZ
Apr 12, 2006
#19
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #19
here's an article on tested plenums. http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=38

maybe it tells you something that they used the accufab TB on all the plenums they tested :idunno:

i went with the accufab
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 12, 2006
#20
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #20
now if i can just find one of those that uses the accufab Plenum w/ 4 differnt TB's
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
New guy- first Stang- I love it !!
  • smid333
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
138
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2026
smid333
S
I
Engine Insane fuel trims +25% LTFT Bank 1, -16% LTFT Bank 2
  • imw_stl
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
264
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 19, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine Base Idle Reset-Accufab
  • 89notchDude
  • Jun 30, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
528
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 22, 2025
Scrapla347
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
314
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
G
79 steering rack problems
  • garyrc
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
108
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?