• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

BBK or Mac

  • Thread starter Thread starter greenlantern
  • Start date Start date Dec 15, 2004

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Dec 15, 2004
#1
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #1
Who's got the best long tubes as far as fitment and quality.
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Dec 15, 2004
#2
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #2
I have a set of BBK LT's on my car with no complaints at all about them. Some people have problems with the drivers side hitting the steering shaft(?) but mine dont have any problems at all. Also I've heard some BBK's dont come with an EGR bung on them... Just what I've heard, I havent seen any other than mine in person or in a picture.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Dec 15, 2004
#3
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #3
its hit or miss with the cheaper stuff, if you want quality, spend more money.
 
X

xYoung347x

New Member
Nov 3, 2003
382
0
0
Dec 16, 2004
#4
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #4
Always go with BBK! If you buy the used Mac headers be prepared to have a lot of patient and clear out your schedule!
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 16, 2004
#5
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #5
Go BBK!
 

FastFord

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
380
0
0
Washington
Dec 16, 2004
#6
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #6
I had both. MAC i had installed in 98 and uninstalled 03. The individual flanges were a real pain to align the holes... I spent many many many hours just getting the %^&%ing bolts in. Once in, the MAC LTs fit and ran great, good sound. But the finish blows. HTS coating does not last, and I had to wrap each header to keep my car from melting. They would melt any nearby wire, even my Energy Suspension motor mounts. The BBKs went in fine, needed to dimple the driver’s side where it contacted the steering knuckle. These LTs are JET-HOT coated!!!! The best thing since sliced bread and mustangs!!! If you go with MAC, get 'em coated, I implore you!!!! The MACs had a louder and deeper effect on the exhaust at idle, the BBKs not so much at idle but louder during load. After all is said and done, I like the BBK coated for the money. Hope this helps.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Dec 16, 2004
#7
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #7
I have a mac shifter, mac U/D pullies, and a mac o/r H pipe (got it used for $70). I will never buy another mac product again. The shifter is ok, its springs are kinda weak, the pullies are rusting and I put back on my stock alt. pulley as I had charging issues (the stock one fixed the issues), and the o/r H well the studs on the back that go to the cat-back were off (I installed it new on the guys car when he bought it new, bought it 'cause he was tired of having to swap it back and forth for smog) and took some "bending" to get in line it too is rusting. I only boght it as I will put some high flow cats on this one and save a buttload on the part.

If I ever redo my exh. I will be going with bassani all the way.

so one more vote for BBK in this situation over mac.
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Dec 16, 2004
#8
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #8
Mac is cheap remember that old saying...you get what you pay for...you gotta pay to play. Go with Bassani headers, UPR makes a good midpipe, and for sound I would go with a Flowmaster cat back, if you want the best of everything save your pennies and get a full Bassani system...polished stainless
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Dec 16, 2004
#9
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #9
Thanks for the info guys.
 
A

AIRRIDE

New Member
Nov 14, 2004
33
0
0
Ontario,Canada
Dec 16, 2004
#10
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #10
I just got a set of BBK long tubes,I like the fit and finsh better.
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Dec 16, 2004
#11
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #11
95.0Stang said:
Mac is cheap remember that old saying...you get what you pay for...you gotta pay to play. Go with Bassani headers, UPR makes a good midpipe, and for sound I would go with a Flowmaster cat back, if you want the best of everything save your pennies and get a full Bassani system...polished stainless
Click to expand...

Bassani? I just left there sight I swear those people are nucking futs. What in the world do they think they've got over there. There prices are crazy. I just ordered the BBKs. Im happy with the BBK shorties I have. All chrome no rust, I'll stick with them.
 

pleasehelp

New Member
Mar 11, 2003
686
0
0
Poplar Grove, Il
Dec 17, 2004
#12
  • Dec 17, 2004
  • #12
WTF??? Where are the MAC people at?? I just bought a set of brand new Mac ceramic longtube headers brand new for $300. I went with Mac cause there use to be threads a while back about the this same topic and 90% of the people replied to get Mac ceramic coated headers over BBK! The only thing some people were complaining about was the single flange design. Looks like you already made your decision. Congrats and good luck
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

WTB BBK 1660 Offroad short X-Pipe (for Fox Body)
  • sketman
  • Oct 12, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
0
Views
150
Want to Buy Oct 12, 2025
sketman
For Sale BBK 1-3/4" long tubes
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Dec 4, 2025
  • Exhaust Parts
Replies
0
Views
203
Exhaust Parts Dec 4, 2025
Kid wita 5oh
BBK 351w headers
  • fully
  • Jan 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
725
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 4, 2025
dcm0123
D
Fox Mid Pipe
  • 93gtmustang
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
241
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 21, 2025
Mustang5L5
G
S550 Headers
  • gray owl
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
196
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Feb 1, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?