• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

BBK SSI intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter soldierboy
  • Start date Start date Sep 13, 2007

soldierboy

New Member
Sep 13, 2007
5
0
0
Kansas City
Sep 13, 2007
#1
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #1
i was wondering how good the BBK SSI intake as well as the BBK Race intake manifolds were. i haven't really heard anything about them and i'm torn between getting one of those or a trick flow intake manifold thanks for your help
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 13, 2007
#2
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #2
There's a couple of guys that have ran them (the SSI intake) here on the forums. I can only remember one off hand (69clark). I believe he had several problems with it, one of which being big oil control problems with the PCV valve. He sold it after a short time and ended up putting a sheetmetal intake on instead. The other one was over here in the Fox 5.0 side, as 69clark is a 94-95 guy. I'm not totally familiar with the other one, and don't remember the whole story, so hopefully someone will come along and let you know about that one. You really couldn't go wrong with one of the TFS intakes though. They're exceptionally high quality pieces, and can flow some amazing numbers. If it were up to me, it'd be TFS hands down.
 

85ragtop

BTW, I like dudes.
10 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
823
475
123
NC
Sep 13, 2007
#3
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #3
DO a search there are a lot of threads on it.
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Sep 13, 2007
#4
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #4
1st off welcome to Stangnet! 2nd, thanks for serving your country. Ok, now for your question, what are your plans for the engine? I see you are looking at a stroker when you get back. Do you have ideas as far as power goals, driveability, cam specs, intended use (street / strip)? Since these intakes are relatively new I haven't heard much about them. I don't think there is much experience with them yet. Searching the threads would be a good idea because I know there has been discussion on here about them. As far as the TFS intakes, I run the street heat and am impressed with the performance. I wasn't impressed with the ease of installation though. I had to grind on the upper in order to make room for the socket so I could tighten the upper bolts.
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Sep 13, 2007
#5
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #5
there crap. the end
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Sep 13, 2007
#6
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #6
.

BK_CAULEY said:
there crap. the end
Click to expand...

Wow! Thanks for the totally useless comment!

From what I've read, the SSI intake is not all that great. It looks pretty cool, but I think that's as far as it goes. I think they should have made it to use dual throttle bodies or made a center TB like the GM F-bodies have. Would have been much cooler. I would search around for some reviews.
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Sep 13, 2007
#7
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #7
samickguy15 said:
Wow! Thanks for the totally useless comment! .
Click to expand...

your welcome. like yours was any more helpfull than mine. and the only reason i say it is because ive seen a bunch of the topics get brougth up and i once looked at getting it and i know where the problems occur. and he didnt ask what would make it look cooler.
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Sep 13, 2007
#8
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #8
BK_CAULEY said:
your welcome. like yours was any more helpfull than mine. and the only reason i say it is because ive seen a bunch of the topics get brougth up and i once looked at getting it and i know where the problems occur. and he didnt ask what would make it look cooler.
Click to expand...

Posts like, "it's junk" are totally useless. If you say, "It's junk. I've read a dozen articles that say XXX intake is the better choice." That is a worthy post. I included that I had read in a couple of places that it was not very good and added my $.02 that I liked the way it looked.
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Sep 13, 2007
#9
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #9
here is what i have physically seen wrong with them. the casting between the upper and lower intake is off. they cause small vacum leaks and rough idles. the fuel line run's between the upper and lower and because of its placement rubs the sharp edges of the intake and causes it to bust. and the injector castings in the lower are a little off camber and cause injector O-rings to fail and leaks gas.
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Sep 13, 2007
#10
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #10
BK_CAULEY said:
here is what i have physically seen wrong with them. the casting between the upper and lower intake is off. they cause small vacum leaks and rough idles. the fuel line run's between the upper and lower and because of its placement rubs the sharp edges of the intake and causes it to bust. and the injector castings in the lower are a little off camber and cause injector O-rings to fail and leaks gas.
Click to expand...

Now that's a good post.
 

carbed87

Member
Jun 5, 2005
215
0
16
Sep 13, 2007
#11
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #11
i like mine, it looks great mocked up on my engine stand
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Sep 14, 2007
#12
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #12
I have also heard all the problems that BKcauley mentioned. They have oil consumption problems due to PCV placement. The fuel rails are nice...but they are large and have fitment issues and do cause a funky angle with the injector seats. For some reason the angle does not allow the o rings to seal properly and it may leak. They do look cool though?! i guess.

Whats the plan for the engine. The explorer/cobra/gt-40 intake produces the nicest street friendly torque curve you can find on the market. But they run out of steam above 5000 rpm. good luck man
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
BBK SSI Crossover tube
  • yaboity
  • May 17, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
627
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 7, 2025
yaboity
Y
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
468
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Trick Flow Series R to Box R Upper Intake Road Block
  • Habu135
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
Habu135
For Sale Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
131
Engine and Power Adder Thursday at 10:31 PM
Habu135
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
214
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?