• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Beggars can't be choosers...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shirley
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

Shirley

Founding Member
Nov 14, 2001
112
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 29, 2005
#1
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #1
Probably like 50-60% of us in here are on a budget, including yours truly. I was thinking whether I should save up for a kenne bell whipplecharger and 4.10 gears w/ 31 spline c-clip eliminated axles and detroit locker, or a h/c/i combo. I still need to buy new shocks and struts as well. For right now I would be looking for 350-400 rwhp/torque. Daily driven. What would be cheaper? What would be more effective? I guess I'm gonna need a new torque converter, fluid cooler, and valvebody too huh? I need money. Lots of money. :damnit:
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 29, 2005
#2
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #2
Why whipple/kenn bell? Vortec/Paxton will make more power and is cheaper.
 
S

Shirley

Founding Member
Nov 14, 2001
112
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 30, 2005
#3
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #3
i just heard that the whipple is great for autos
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Sep 30, 2005
#4
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #4
I just read an article awhile ago about c-clip eliminators on daily driven cars. In a nutshell, don't do it. I don't remember why... I'll see if I can find it. Something about them wearing out really fast, only designed for a couple thousand miles. C-clips almost never break, and there are better insurance methods. Unless you're car only ever sees track duty...
 

Blk91stang

Member
Jan 3, 2003
607
0
16
North Brunswick, NJ
Sep 30, 2005
#5
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #5
Call up strange for the rear. They make 31 spline axles with C-Clip. Don't use c-clip eliminators for the street. Although, I think Strange does make a different style C-Clip eliminator that can be used for the street if you really want to get rid of them(you won't break 31-spline c-clip axles).
 

88gt

Founding Member
Aug 2, 1999
794
0
0
Drillers cabin
Sep 30, 2005
#6
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #6
stangbear427 said:
I just read an article awhile ago about c-clip eliminators on daily driven cars. In a nutshell, don't do it. I don't remember why... I'll see if I can find it. Something about them wearing out really fast, only designed for a couple thousand miles. C-clips almost never break, and there are better insurance methods. Unless you're car only ever sees track duty...
Click to expand...


Not be arguementitive, but, if rears w/o c-clips (pressed-on bearings at the axle flanges) is a bad idea....why are there so many 9 inch rears out there on daily driven cars? need more input please?
 

Blakthorn

Member
Jul 24, 2004
299
1
16
US
Sep 30, 2005
#7
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #7
is that too much gear with a SC?
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Sep 30, 2005
#8
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #8
Way too much rear gear for a car with a supercharger.. You have to decide which way you want to go with your car. Personally I like N/A cars for DD's since you have less maintinance and trouble free operation.

As for the C-clip thing... I think we recently debated this, and I still say there is nothing wrong with getting rid of the c-clips on a street car.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Sep 30, 2005
#9
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #9
there is no reason why you couldnt use c clip eliminator on the street! i did it for two years
 
S

Shirley

Founding Member
Nov 14, 2001
112
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 30, 2005
#10
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #10
Thanks for the info on the rear end but my main concern is whether to go supercharged or n/a which would be the cheaper option, and which would be more practical? Second, 4.10's are too much for an auto with a supercharger, I thought the AOD needed all the help it can get.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Sep 30, 2005
#11
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #11
srothfuss said:
Personally I like N/A cars for DD's since you have less maintinance and trouble free operation.
Click to expand...
this is coming from a guy w/ a stock motor. Nothing against him, but if you do H/C/I, you probably will have all of the idle issues and all of the normal stuff that comes w/ a modified car.

However, I don't think you could reliably boost your stock motor high enough to reach your rwhp goal. To reach your goal, you'd most likely have to do either a good H/C/I or a mild H/C/I and a supercharger...or turbocharger.

That's just my opinion though.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Sep 30, 2005
#12
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #12
Shirley said:
Thanks for the info on the rear end but my main concern is whether to go supercharged or n/a which would be the cheaper option, and which would be more practical? Second, 4.10's are too much for an auto with a supercharger, I thought the AOD needed all the help it can get.
Click to expand...

I suppose the real question is how fast do you want to go? Are you looking for a low 12 second car or just something to suprise the import that pulls up next to you and rev's his engine? Start out conservative and add more goodies as opportunity and budget permit.

Screw or Roots superchargers fall into the category of postive displacement superchargers. They produce most of their boost in the low to mid-range RPM band. Using 4.10's may give you a lot of kick at low speeds, but it may be too much torque to sucessfully communicate to the ground without some major chassis & suspension work. That translates into a car that spins and smokes the tires more than it goes. Kind of like driving 400 HP in the rain all the time - scary & slippery.

Don't forget to take into account that the 4.10's will increase the RPM's that drink gas and can raise the noise level up to the point that you avoid long trips. Mustang exhaust systems are famous for the drone that starts at 1700 RPM's and doesn't taper off until you get above 2300 RPM. Most of the time you have to turn the radio amost to the pain level and shouting can become a habit.

Too loose a converter will be mismatch for a postive displacement supercharger, since it has lots of low end torque and boost drops off as RPM's reach the upper ranges.

My personal choice would be an H/C/I combination with some good aluminum heads. That way you can add pressurized induction at a later time and get more power with less boost. Stay away from heads with large port volumes and monster valves for a Daily Driver - you'll lose too much low end power. In like manner, avoid wild cams - the lopey idle may sound cool, but it kills the low end as well.

Once you do commit to an H/C/I package, you'll need to make some decisions about the trans and converter. Keep you future plans in mind when you make your choices. Too loose on the converter and you take away the streetablity. Too tight on the converter and you can't get the RPM's up to get going quickly.
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Sep 30, 2005
#13
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #13
I did a HCI with my 5.0 and i absolutely love it. Its lighter and so agile.

AFR165s and the trickflow cam, GT40E intake and i made 331 rwtq @ 3700 RPM.

has ****load of upper RPM power and enough low end to be fun. Plus the power is always there, boost is for patient people.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Sep 30, 2005
#14
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #14
Dbeck002 said:
I did a HCI with my 5.0 and i absolutely love it. Its lighter and so agile.

AFR165s and the trickflow cam, GT40E intake and i made 331 rwtq @ 3700 RPM.

has ****load of upper RPM power and enough low end to be fun. Plus the power is always there, boost is for patient people.
Click to expand...

Excellent choice for a street machine that can do good at the strip too.
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Sep 30, 2005
#15
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #15
Dbeck002 said:
I did a HCI with my 5.0 and i absolutely love it. Its lighter and so agile.

AFR165s and the trickflow cam, GT40E intake and i made 331 rwtq @ 3700 RPM.

has ****load of upper RPM power and enough low end to be fun. Plus the power is always there, boost is for patient people.
Click to expand...
Well, he did say he wanted a KB blower so I don't think he'll be waiting too long for boost. Excellent numbers on your combo, btw. Nice.
 
S

Shirley

Founding Member
Nov 14, 2001
112
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 30, 2005
#16
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #16
i think I am gonna go h/c/i, address the transmission, and finish the rearend and suspension. I think that will tide me over until I really want to get serious. I am looking for a mid to low twelve streetable cardaily driven car.
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Sep 30, 2005
#17
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #17
whats the horse power on that 331 torque combo??
pauly perreca
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Sep 30, 2005
#18
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #18
TheUser said:
this is coming from a guy w/ a stock motor. Nothing against him, but if you do H/C/I, you probably will have all of the idle issues and all of the normal stuff that comes w/ a modified car.

That's just my opinion though.
Click to expand...


I can understand that with any car that you modify you COULD have issues if you chose the wrong cam, or a cooling system that is not up to the challenge, then you can have lots of problems... Planning makes all the difference here.

My car is stock because I don't know what I want to do with it yet, but I have owned plenty of cars and built plenty of motors. I still stand by my statement. N/A cars will last longer and give little to no issues after years of driving / abuse.
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Sep 30, 2005
#19
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #19
ill advised said:
Well, he did say he wanted a KB blower so I don't think he'll be waiting too long for boost. Excellent numbers on your combo, btw. Nice.
Click to expand...



Haha, KB are sweet, no lag..






Thanks BTW
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Sep 30, 2005
#20
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #20
srothfuss said:
I can understand that with any car that you modify you COULD have issues if you chose the wrong cam, or a cooling system that is not up to the challenge, then you can have lots of problems... Planning makes all the difference here.

My car is stock because I don't know what I want to do with it yet, but I have owned plenty of cars and built plenty of motors. I still stand by my statement. N/A cars will last longer and give little to no issues after years of driving / abuse.
Click to expand...


you are right... N/A performance motors generally last longer.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
460
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sunday at 1:36 PM
joeybuddy96
J
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
575
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
535
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
M
Axle help
  • Mnkyarms
  • May 18, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?