• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Bent Valve was the problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter rrudholm
  • Start date Start date Aug 2, 2006

rrudholm

New Member
Apr 23, 2006
60
0
0
Aug 2, 2006
#1
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #1
I just pulled the Roush 200 heads off to find some of the valves have made contact with pistons and one bent valve. The "A" hole that built my engine sold me these heads refurbished. I have learned one thing, I will never buy refurbished anything agian. I have also learned that I don't want these crapy cast iron heads anyway. The $650 I lost will have to be considered "stupid Tax" Is it possible that the 2.02 valves in these Roush heads are too big for stock pistons and that is why they hit pistons or Valve float? I am looking at buying Edelbrock Performer EDL-60329 Cylinder Heads. Anyone using these?
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Aug 2, 2006
#2
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #2
rrudholm said:
Is it possible that the 2.02 valves in these Roush heads are too big for stock pistons and that is why they hit pistons or Valve float? I am looking at buying Edelbrock Performer EDL-60329 Cylinder Heads. Anyone using these?
Click to expand...
Yes that is exactly the problem. Your builder should have checked piston to valve clearance.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 2, 2006
#3
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #3
Not Sure

But as I understand it

Valves that big only work with our oem shortblock if they are canted like TFS and the like.

Hate to see you had the issue

Maybe you can get them back in shape for just a little cash and sell em to go for Plan "B"

Grady
 

rrudholm

New Member
Apr 23, 2006
60
0
0
Aug 2, 2006
#4
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #4
I was going to go new aluminum heads when the engine was built but I cheaped out. I'm finding out the hard way, Just do it right the first time

Anyone using Edlbrock Performer heads?
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Aug 2, 2006
#5
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #5
rrudholm said:
I was going to go new aluminum heads when the engine was built but I cheaped out. I'm finding out the hard way, Just do it right the first time

Anyone using Edlbrock Performer heads?
Click to expand...
Yeah i have the 60329 heads on my stang. Love em!
 

rrudholm

New Member
Apr 23, 2006
60
0
0
Aug 3, 2006
#6
  • Aug 3, 2006
  • #6
What size push rods did you use? I have hardened 6.25" with Crane Cams stud mount rockers (energizers) and FMS E-303 cam.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Aug 3, 2006
#7
  • Aug 3, 2006
  • #7
The heads are not junk it was 100% install/parts match up/combo choice. It sucks to hear about but not the heads fault.

Why not notch the pistons and get the bad valves replaced...it would prob. be cheaper and would work then.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Aug 3, 2006
#8
  • Aug 3, 2006
  • #8
rrudholm said:
What size push rods did you use? I have hardened 6.25" with Crane Cams stud mount rockers (energizers) and FMS E-303 cam.
Click to expand...
I used stock length hardened push rods with a Crane 2031 cam and Trick Flow 1.7 Rockers. With my new 347 combo im using the same pushrods, and rockers, with an FTI cam and my geometry was great.
 

rrudholm

New Member
Apr 23, 2006
60
0
0
Aug 3, 2006
#9
  • Aug 3, 2006
  • #9
I'm wondering if it was not really a mismatch but rather the springs are too weak or the builder had the rockers adjusted too tight from the start because this thing was running great up until I reved it real good and hard. I got on it some what before and nothing hapened?
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Aug 3, 2006
#10
  • Aug 3, 2006
  • #10
Have you spoke to the gent who built it??
 

rrudholm

New Member
Apr 23, 2006
60
0
0
Aug 4, 2006
#11
  • Aug 4, 2006
  • #11
oh Ya, West Michigan Machine in Muskegon, Michigan. He does not want to own up to the fact that he did something wrong. The word on the street is that this company had a good reputation and now it's not so true any more as it has changed ownership. I didn't know this going in. I have analyzed closely what has happened with my engine and believe it was valve float. I'm going to take these heads to another machine shop and see if maybe he has the wrong springs. I know that with a roller cam you need a pretty beefy spring.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
676
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
395
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Fox Help on how to repair valvetrain. Damaged valve.
  • 93CalypsoConvert
  • Jun 5, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 5, 2023
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?