• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Best flowing mufflers

  • Thread starter Thread starter jas142
  • Start date Start date Jan 1, 2004
J

jas142

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,358
0
0
Jan 1, 2004
#1
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #1
We all debate sound, but what about the best flow? The flowmasters look restrictive as hell. Do magnapacks actually make any more power then flows?
 

cantthinkofname

cantthinkoftitle
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
3,673
0
0
Ya, here's to The Drunken Clam boys, where they do
Jan 1, 2004
#2
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #2
any muffler without "chambers" or baffles will flow more.
 

decoy562

New Member
Oct 9, 2003
1,526
0
0
Acworth, GA
Jan 1, 2004
#3
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #3
jas142 said:
We all debate sound, but what about the best flow? The flowmasters look restrictive as hell. Do magnapacks actually make any more power then flows?
Click to expand...

Yes. If you go to another mustang website, www.corral.net, they have a project car called "Mongoose," where they put on a Magnaflow catback system on a stock car, and gained 10hp and 12lb/ft of torque if I remember correctly. My SOTP feel is that my car gained a little after adding a Magnaflow catback system.
 
J

jas142

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,358
0
0
Jan 1, 2004
#4
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #4
I knew they'd flow better because its a straight through design, but does it actually translate to any more power? Or just noise?
 
W

wht99gtconv

New Member
Dec 1, 2003
267
0
0
Jan 1, 2004
#5
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #5
I have always been told that dynomax flows better than any muffler.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 1, 2004
#6
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #6
I don't think you're going to find much, if any, difference on a car that's not pushing major boost. I don't know how someone on corral picked up 10HP on a stock car.
 
S

Solid Snake

Banned
Nov 26, 2002
940
0
0
GA
Jan 1, 2004
#7
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #7
Either MM&FF or 5.0 had a muffler comparison a while back. They tested a whole bunch of mufflers and have power and sound comparisons
 
0

01'TRUE BLUE GT

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
4,984
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA.
Jan 1, 2004
#8
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #8
Volldamort said:
Either MM&FF or 5.0 had a muffler comparison a while back. They tested a whole bunch of mufflers and have power and sound comparisons
Click to expand...

You're right, I have that issue (Dec. 2002). It's all there in black and white ... ALL the mufflers were within roughly 2-3 HP of one another so don't get your hopes up too high about having the best one. Bassani's Real Street did take the trophy out of all of them though ... not bad for $186 a piece, huh?

What pi$$es me off is that the muffler Flowmaster sent them is NOT the one used in the American Thunder (Delta 40) that 99% of us here happen to have. Why the hell did Flowmaster send an SUV muffler in for their test? What are they trying to hide? They KNOW damn well what most of us have on our cars and they pulled that $hit.
 

skywarp

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
379
0
0
Jan 1, 2004
#9
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #9
I'm going to get the FRPP kit. From what I've seen theirs pros and cons to each system. I went to a local dealers website and they said it was made by ARVIN for Ford racing.
 

Defleshed

Satanic Mechanic
Nov 30, 2003
10,569
1
0
In Torment, In Hell
Jan 2, 2004
#10
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #10
SLP loudmouths are the least restrictive on the market right now
 

GoBabyVroommm

Active Member
Mar 22, 2003
1,156
0
36
Chicago, For Realss???!!!
Jan 2, 2004
#11
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #11
Dyno Max are pretty good.
 

tontot77

Do I look like a :taco: in this picture?
Apr 2, 2003
409
0
16
Dyer Indiana
Jan 2, 2004
#12
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #12
http://www.quicktimeperformance.com/qtec.htm

get cut outs and quit ****ing around

gobaby, when is the car giong to be out of the shop?
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
Houston
Jan 2, 2004
#13
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #13
Im gonna say Dynomax, Magnaflow, and SLP are the best right now. Chambered designs actually employ more restrictive airflow to create that deep and mellow tone all Flowmaster owners love.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jan 2, 2004
#14
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #14
The results in HP order:

1.Flowtech Warlock (open) 374.2 hp/ 333.1 tq
2.Bassani Real Street 373.7 hp/ 333.8 tq
3.Hooker Maxflow 373.5 hp/ 333 tq
4.Borla XS 373.3 hp/ 332.6 tq
5.Magnaflow 372.8 / 332.5 tq
6.MAC 372.3 hp / 331.5 tq
7.Flowtech Afterburner 372.3 hp/ 330.1 tq
8.Hooker Aerochamber 372.1 hp/ 330.4 tq
9.Bassani 372 hp/ 333.5 tq
10.Spintech 371.6 hp/ 332.2 tq
11.Edelbrock Performer RPM 370.9 hp / 331.3 tq
12.Borla XR1 370 hp/ 334 tq
13.Flowtech Terminator 369.5 hp / 331.3 tq
14.Dynomax Ultra Flo 369.4 / 333.2 tq
15.Flowmaster 369.4 hp / 331.8 tq
16.Flowtech Warlock 366.3 hp / 325.3 tq
17.No muffs 365.2 hp / 330.1 tq

Sound Off in Quietest to Loudest (Decibels):

1.Borla XS, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 110db at WOT.
2.Hooker Maxflow, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
3.Magnaflow, 82db at idle, 91 at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
4.Flowmaster, 82db at idle, 93 at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
5.Flowtech Warlock, 83db at idle, 92 at 2,000 rpm, 112db at WOT.
6.Dynomax UltraFlo, 83db at idle, 94 at 2,000 rpm, 113db at WOT.
7.Borla XR1, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
8.Bassani Street, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
9.Edelbrock RPM, 84db at idle, 93db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
10.Bassani Real Street, 84db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
11.Flowtech Afterburner, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
12.Flowtech Terminator, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
13.Hooker Aerochamber, 87db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
14.SpinTech, 87db at idle, 97db at 2,000 rpm, 116db at WOT.
15.MAC, 87db at idle, 98db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
16.No Muffler, 91db at idle, 103db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
 

4.6MustangSteve

New Member
Jun 13, 2003
219
0
0
Northern VA, USA
Jan 2, 2004
#15
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #15
my magnaflows go straight through with no chambers or anything in the way, so i suspect the little buggers flow pretty well.
 

Russ-4.6

New Member
Nov 26, 2003
45
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#16
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #16
OK 95snoozer, did the article compare them to stock?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
179
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
49
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
B
Screamin Demons Worth It N/A?
  • Blackout67
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
247
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
Noobz347
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
252
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
505
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?