• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

best intake for the money?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88GT4u2nv
  • Start date Start date Jul 15, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
Jul 17, 2006
#21
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #21
RWDtech said:
ok explain the explorer intake....is it actually from a ford explorer?
Click to expand...
Yes, shares the same lower as the Cobra and the tube GT40, and has a slightly different upper, flows basically the same as the Cobra.
 

4G-KDMP

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2005
935
19
39
36
CA
Jul 17, 2006
#22
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #22
Curse said:
Its funny how the people who do not have the Typhoon intake seem to know more about it that the people who do. Isn't that veird
Click to expand...

the same seems to go for a lot of products.
 

Curse

Member
Apr 8, 2004
791
2
16
El Paso, TX
Jul 17, 2006
#23
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #23
mob said:
5 out of the 6 people I posted owned it. 7th was the guy who said it looked good, and the 8th is FORDMUSCLE webmagazine who said it came shipped with a minimal clean up job to lower costs. Very veird.

I posted their names bitch to them about it not me, never said I knew more about it then you, just posting what ive heard.
Click to expand...

I was not responding to your post, did I qoute you at all? Whenever the typhoon intake comes up, people chime in on what they have heard and have no idea what they are talking about(such as yourself) and bash it for being an overseas product. Next time if you have no experiance with the product, why chime in?
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
37
Dallas, TX
Jul 17, 2006
#24
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #24
Well ive seen how you like to make those sarcastic comments and seeing as there is no one else in this thread who said anything about the typhoon, what were you responding to? And the only people who posted between your first post and your second was, rwdtech, and shakerhood and they said nothing about the typoon, guess you just felt like making another post about dumb people right?

And second Ive never bashed the intake for being made overseas, I really could care less, and I think its dumb for people to say its **** because it was made overseas, im sure thats why it comes shipped with minimal cleaning because of the cost, but never said anything bad about it. This is a forum, he asked for my opinion i gave it, All i said was having the intake shipped and paying more to have it cleaned up wouldnt be the best route when you can get an explorer or cobra for cheap. You guys took it to another level. But maybe now if someone does decide they want the typhoon intake, seeing as people have posted the runners need to be cleaned, they will look into it further and decide for themselves if its worth it.
 

Curse

Member
Apr 8, 2004
791
2
16
El Paso, TX
Jul 18, 2006
#25
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #25
Dude what the hell are you talking about? You need to calm down, those teen age hormones must be acting up. Not once did I attack you or make any sarcastic comments towards you untill you singled me out for some reason.

The typhoon out flows the cobra and explorer. You can get a used typhoon as cheap as a cobra/explorer, have Tmoss work his magic and it will seriously out flow the cobra/explorer.
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
37
Dallas, TX
Jul 18, 2006
#26
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #26
lol sorry, its late.

Wheres dman posting pictures of his dog when you need him, that always makes a thread happy.
 

bob331T76

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
76
0
0
so cal
Jul 18, 2006
#27
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #27
save your $$$ and buy a real intake
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Jul 18, 2006
#28
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #28
Curse said:
I was not responding to your post, did I qoute you at all? Whenever the typhoon intake comes up, people chime in on what they have heard and have no idea what they are talking about(such as yourself) and bash it for being an overseas product. Next time if you have no experiance with the product, why chime in?
Click to expand...

Hmmm.. primarily because this is a DISCUSSION forum? Data can be gathered without the need to have run the item personally, particularly by those who've considered the piece for themselves and already spent time looking into it.

You need not stick your hands into hot coals to know it'll hurt.

As for the Typhoon castings... yeah... their quality control leaves a lot to be desired. It doesn't mean that the part is incapable of performing, only that the castings leave lots of room for improvement. I've not run one of these things either but I've seen enough of the offering to know that if I'd planned to, that I'd also plan on getting it worked over prior to isntallation. I've recommended the Typhoon to folks before who were looking for low-buck solution but also bring up that it'll likely require some attention to "make right".
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
55
windsor, Canada
members.cardomain.com
Jul 18, 2006
#29
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #29
wOw things got ugly last night...I don't think there's enough love around here. It's a decent intake...if you get a good casting then you're golden...a bad one then clean it up..same holds true for any intake you buy.
Derek.
 

RWDtech

Member
Feb 28, 2006
119
4
19
40
central Indiana
Jul 19, 2006
#30
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #30
so what years 5.0 explorer did this intake come on
 

88GT4u2nv

New Member
Nov 18, 2004
60
0
0
40
Wa
Jul 27, 2006
#31
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #31
wow, this got whored out pretty quick, i think im gonna go with the tfs. thanks guys. GAME ON!
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
125
Huntsvegas, AL
Jul 27, 2006
#32
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #32
RWDtech said:
so what years 5.0 explorer did this intake come on
Click to expand...

me thinks 95-97 but I'd check against someoone else. I have one I'm about to put on my 93.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jul 27, 2006
#33
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #33
If anybody is interested, I'll have a polished TFS Street heat for sale in a week or two. I would be happy to sell it for $325 shipped anywhere in the lower 40. I'm not trying to post jack.....I'm just saying......
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
125
Huntsvegas, AL
Jul 27, 2006
#34
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #34
QDRHRSE said:
If anybody is interested, I'll have a polished TFS Street heat for sale in a week or two. I would be happy to sell it for $325 shipped anywhere in the lower 40. I'm not trying to post jack.....I'm just saying......
Click to expand...

So are you trying to avatar jack then???
 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Jul 27, 2006
#35
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #35
If money is an issue, I vote for the explorer intake, but that's because I'm broke.

I beleive ALL 5.0 explorers had this intake.

It's not as cool looking as the GT-40, but it's money in your pocket, and the upper can be ported for more flow.

I knew a few years ago when I bought mine, they usually came as a "take off" so they still had the explorer 65mm (?) throttle body attached, and the explorer injectors. The injectors will not work with a mustang wiring harness, but I have seen a write-up on making the throttle body work. Never done that myself though.

Jeff
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
38
Miami, Ok
Jul 27, 2006
#36
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #36
explorer intake might be a good choice, but its not a simple bolt on. the vacuum ports must be modified or u must run more vac lines.

and there are 2 dif intakes.
the internal EGR (like the mustangs) with the egr hole in b/w the 2 sections of runners.

i bought an upper WITHOUT the egr hole. my lower had it so running it would result in no EGR. unless you get a matching upper.

also most years didnt have the ACT threads. there is a boss for it, but no hole.

i drilled and tapped it, its a 3/8 NPT thread.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
www.hud-son.com
Jul 27, 2006
#37
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #37
Shakerhood said:
I know this is a question about power, but for looks I have always loved the Tubular look of the GT40.
Click to expand...

agreed
 
S

slow93

New Member
May 3, 2005
406
0
0
Jul 28, 2006
#38
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #38
my vortech intake is up on ebay if anyone may be interested...more expensive than the explorer intake but its a real good intake
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Resolved Intake question
  • d fed
  • Aug 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
344
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
mattcrp1
M
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
151
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
827
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?