• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Best Long tubes - BBK or MAC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Green Machine
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Green Machine

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2001
481
9
28
Lakeland Florida
Mar 30, 2004
#1
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #1
Trying to break 300 rwhp, and I've heard good things about Long Tube headers.

So which brand has better quality - BBK or MAC ?

Easy of installation - BBK or MAC ?

Do they fit AFR heads alright ?

Which O/R pipe gives more torque with Long Tubes - X-pipe or H-pipe ?

Is it true BBK has now come out with a shorty x-pipe for there LT's ?

Which finish - HTS or polished ceramic ?

I've got FMS shorty's with Bassani O/R X-pipe and I was wondering approx how much more torque and rwhp I'll make with the long tubes and O/R X or H pipe ?

Thanks Dewman
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Mar 30, 2004
#2
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #2
I am going with MACs

but oddly enough in the t347 they tested in MMFF the unequal lengths headers made more peak power than the long tubes. LTs only beat them down low below the racing powerband
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 30, 2004
#3
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #3
I have macs and I had no problems fitting them on the afr's. I dont really know on quality as I have no experience with the bbk's. I love how quiet they are at idle and how loud they are at wot.


 

Killer95Stang

New Member
Aug 7, 2003
256
1
0
Covina, CA
Mar 30, 2004
#4
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #4
I know people will say differently, but I'm real happy with my MAC Ceramic Coated LT's... The fit was great, plus the price was better... Plus I gained 20rwhp, when I switched from MAC shorties, BBK Catted H, and slowmasters, to MAC LT's, Dr Gas X, and Bassani Mufflers.. I'm happy as can be..
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 30, 2004
#5
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #5
I dont really know on the other questions because I haven't been to the dyno yet.


There is a dyno at the school I'm attending but the teacher who runs the dyno is gone till summer, so I'll have to go elsewhere.
 

Green Machine

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2001
481
9
28
Lakeland Florida
Mar 30, 2004
#6
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #6
Thanks for the info ! Has anyone found out how much more torque the LT's produced over the shorty's ? Thanks again !
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Mar 30, 2004
#7
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #7
Not much to add here but, i run Mac LTs, last Summer with a Tmoss stock lower i was at like 315 TQ or so...Thats purdy decent for what i had...LTs may have has a hand in that???...Chit, Killer got 20 ponies..thats worth it in my book...I read that article in 5.0 to....kinda surprised me..I thought the LTs would shine...Didn't appear that way...
 

Green Machine

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2001
481
9
28
Lakeland Florida
Mar 30, 2004
#8
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #8
RIO5.0

Thanks for the reply.

I see you have Pro Chambers. I presume that there MAC's high performance O/R H-pipe. I understand using that with LT's make ~ 20 rwhp and ~15 lbs of torque.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Mar 30, 2004
#9
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #9
LTs only beat them down low below the racing powerband
Click to expand...

Wait. . .I thought LT's had less low end torque than shorties
 
9

95StocK50

New Member
Dec 19, 2002
398
0
0
Idaho
Mar 30, 2004
#10
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #10
BBK

nathan
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 30, 2004
#11
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #11
MAC

Jake
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 30, 2004
#12
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #12
Zero Signal said:
Wait. . .I thought LT's had less low end torque than shorties
Click to expand...



I think you're right, L/T's usually give up a little torque on the low end. But I did read that article Snoozer was talking about and they also said if your gonna get LT's , you should go with 1 3/4". So I dont really know.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 30, 2004
#13
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #13
95snoozer said:
but oddly enough in the t347 they tested in MMFF the unequal lengths headers made more peak power than the long tubes. LTs only beat them down low below the racing powerband
Click to expand...

That test has to have something up with it. I don't get it. Trap speed is an indication of horsepower and with identical mods as WhiteDevil (he has a TB and MAF and short tubes otherwise the same) I trap 1 mph more than him in the 1/8. His track is also at a lower elevation and he has better sixties than me. I still believe long tubes will out do the shorties at the track any day of the week.

Jake
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 30, 2004
#14
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #14
Sleepy McNastee said:
I think you're right, L/T's usually give up a little torque on the low end.
Click to expand...

I didn't feel it...

Jake
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 30, 2004
#15
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #15
GTJake said:
I didn't feel it...

Jake
Click to expand...


Me neither.
 

Green Machine

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2001
481
9
28
Lakeland Florida
Apr 4, 2004
#16
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #16
KOOKS LT's $$$ - Worth It ???

I see alot of our folks running MAC's or BBK Long tubes. Has anyone tried the 1 3/4" Kooks Long Tubes with AFR heads.

Talk about $$$$, are they worth it ?


I'm leaning toward BBK ceramic coated LT's with there new shorty X-pipe. Mainly cause I like the raspiness of the x-pipe, and not to mention it makes more hp.

Thanks,Dewman
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Apr 4, 2004
#17
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #17
1 3/4" might be a little too much. The 1 5/8" might be better for your combo.

Jake
 

Green Machine

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2001
481
9
28
Lakeland Florida
Apr 4, 2004
#18
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #18
Jake - Thats what I was thinking. This is a daily driver, and not a drag car.
Thanks
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
Apr 4, 2004
#19
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #19
one vote for the BBK LTs, i love 'em
 
G

greg@berkeley

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2002
1,172
0
0
minnesota / university of california, berkeley
Apr 4, 2004
#20
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #20
i'm happy w/my bbk ceramic-coated long tubes. pretty good quality, no complaints. no experience w/mac.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
For Sale 2008 Mustang Bullitt for sale Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4C 0S3
  • ROHDRNNR
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
0
Views
49
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 10, 2026
ROHDRNNR
R
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
729
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?