• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

BEST STAND ALONE TUNER

  • Thread starter Thread starter BANGERSTANGER76
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2012

BANGERSTANGER76

Member
Nov 4, 2011
286
9
19
DETROIT PLUGZONE 76
Jan 18, 2012
#1
  • Jan 18, 2012
  • #1
Hey guys,

I have a 94 GT and Im looking to upgrade to a tuner this spring.
Was looking for some ideas of which would be the best for me.
I am a beginner and I would like a tuner that is not extra complicated/sophisticated and that can make my bolt ons/mods perform at their potential. I have heard of Tweecer, PMS, Quarterhorse. Are there others? Which one is most recommended? Thanks in advance for your help/suggestions/knowlwedge.

Banger
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 19, 2012
#2
  • Jan 19, 2012
  • #2
It really depends how much knowledge you can find that will be easy for you to tune yourself. In other words for me the P.M.S was easiest because it simplified things better than the rest. However the twEECer, Quarterhorse seem to be the more popular choices due to price. Plus you can do more (sometimes that's good or bad depending if you know what you're doing) The P.M.S. can be expensive, luckily I found one for like $325 used on the Corral and snatched it up (it was local too). I'd read into those choices and decide which on you think you can handle.

I had the old style P.M.S. controller. Pics doing 80MPH down the highway,


As you can see RPM at 80MPH is 2390, PR-is the Program I using, you can have up to 3 tunes, O2-Running rich (fine with that, better than lean) and total timing is 47 degrees.



Here is the twEECer hooked to a FOX body. The datalogging feature is fantastic. You can dial in TPS, check injectors, MAF, Fuel, O2's, etc from one screen. We had an issue with the TPS sensor while datalogging, it showed like 3.9v at idle and wouldn't move, car would barely stay running. Loosened the screws to adjust it, when I moved it the sensor didn't feel right. I took it off and both ears inside the TPS were sheared off. Bought a new TPS and adjusted it to .98v and the idle was rock solid at 750rpm. Would have chased this problem for who knows how long, 2 minutes of datalogging found it.

 

Attachments

  • PMSlocation.webp
    34.7 KB · Views: 677
  • PMSat80MPH.webp
    20.8 KB · Views: 589
  • 1cf10c5b.webp
    35.3 KB · Views: 821

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 27, 2012
#3
  • Jan 27, 2012
  • #3
Personally I would save your money based on the mods in your sig the gains will be minimal if any.....
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,975
2,958
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 28, 2012
#4
  • Jan 28, 2012
  • #4
Rick 91GT said:
Personally I would save your money based on the mods in your sig the gains will be minimal if any.....
Click to expand...
I agree, a stand alone is a modification that should only be done when the stock ECU cannot control/operate the engine within it's design parameters. The stock ECU can handle a ton of modifications before it needs to be replaced.
 

BradleyMustang3

Member
Jun 4, 2011
148
0
17
New York
Oct 9, 2012
#5
  • Oct 9, 2012
  • #5
since you guys are on the subject what about the SCT tuners with the bama custom tunes cause i was thinking of getting the 4-bank elim for my 95 gt and that being said do you guys know if that tuner gets rid of the adaptive learning?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Oct 9, 2012
#6
  • Oct 9, 2012
  • #6
You really do not want to get rid of adaptive learning on a street car. The SCT multiple bank chip is fine but with your mods I don't think you will get the bang for the buck. I also prefer to see the car on the dyno custom tuned instead of some canned tunes.
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jan 31, 2013
#7
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #7
can the stock MAF on a cobra with 24lb injectors be setup to work with 30lb injectors out of curiousity , does quarterhouse moates do MAF transfers like the tweecer?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 4, 2013
#8
  • Feb 4, 2013
  • #8
I can't recommend the SCT/Bama tunes.
We have a mail order tune for life through Bama, and it's a real pain.
The tunes haven't been right, and turn-around to get the chip reflashed is painfully slow.
It's just not worth it with all the down time alone. The chip spends more time in the mail than in the car.
 

Yellow302

Member
Mar 2, 2003
789
2
19
NJ
Jun 4, 2013
#9
  • Jun 4, 2013
  • #9
ratio411 said:
I can't recommend the SCT/Bama tunes.
We have a mail order tune for life through Bama, and it's a real pain.
The tunes haven't been right, and turn-around to get the chip reflashed is painfully slow.
It's just not worth it with all the down time alone. The chip spends more time in the mail than in the car.
Click to expand...

agreed, if I had to do it all over again, either the PMS system or... the very expensive
XFI 2.0 System
The ECU 301000 $1645.45
Main harness 301100 $356.95
Injector harness 301203 $120.55
Ignition harness 301308 $70.65
Sensor Kit 307051 $148.87 (this does include a 3-bar map sensor)
IAC Housing 307022 $95.42 (This adapts Ford to GM IAC motor)
IAC Motor 307014 $50.45
Total $2488.34 (Free shipping in the lower 48 states)

That was my quote for my supercharged application. This system is completely self tuning.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,153
21,324
234
Box behind Walmart
Jun 6, 2013
#10
  • Jun 6, 2013
  • #10
ratio411 said:
I can't recommend the SCT/Bama tunes.
We have a mail order tune for life through Bama, and it's a real pain.
The tunes haven't been right, and turn-around to get the chip reflashed is painfully slow.
It's just not worth it with all the down time alone. The chip spends more time in the mail than in the car.
Click to expand...
Shelf tunes are ALWAYS a crap shoot. I've typed those words more times than I care to count. Guess it's an alien concept of some sort.
 
G

gt42lasersn95x

New Member
Jul 12, 2013
8
0
1
Jul 12, 2013
#11
  • Jul 12, 2013
  • #11
You really want to trash the adaptive learning comp if you don't wanna have problems tuning and if you ever
wanna make seriousr power
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,153
21,324
234
Box behind Walmart
Jul 14, 2013
#12
  • Jul 14, 2013
  • #12
gt42lasersn95x said:
You really want to trash the adaptive learning comp if you don't wanna have problems tuning and if you ever
wanna make seriousr power
Click to expand...


Translation: "I don't know what I'm doing and should probably seek the assistance of a professional".

Adaptive learning is the ability for the EEC to account for changes in temperature, barometric pressure, and even humidity. If you're tuning for quick passes down the race track then by all means, get rid of adaptive control. You can always adjust tuning just prior to setting up at the light. If you're running on the street then adaptive learning is the strategy that takes care of those minor adjustments. Disabling for a street car is going in the wrong direction. The adaptive strategy has NOTHING at all to do with how much power you're able to produce.
 
Reactions: nicksride
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
765
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
H
'86 New Turbo Build First Start/Idle Trouble. Full Tune specs attached
  • Heffay
  • Jul 10, 2022
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 12, 2022
Heffay
H
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?