• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Big slicks size dilemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xcessiv
  • Start date Start date Mar 2, 2007
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Mar 2, 2007
#1
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #1
Hi!

I own a '01 GT w/ some bolt-ons running 12.94 @ 108 mph. Until now, the best slicks / gear combo for me was 26x10 and 4.10. It could use the whole power band and optimize my time.

Next spring, I'll install a V2 SQ-Trim w/ Anderson 4" power pipe so I should trap @ around 115 mph which is WAY too high for a 26x10 and 4.10 combo.

Here's the problem:
1) The car currently sits on Sportlines so 28" slicks will obviously rub
2) I'd like to keep the 4.10 gear because Vortech people claim it eliminates any lag found w/ a 3.73 or 3.55
3) M/T don't offer any 27" slick which would be the best for me

What would you do?
1) Change the gear for a 3.73 and stick w/ the 26" slicks
2) Install higher springs and control arms to ensure that 28" won't rub
3) Try to find rare 27" slicks, ex.: M&H ??

Thanks for your help.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 2, 2007
#2
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #2
Xcessiv said:
Hi!

I own a '01 GT w/ some bolt-ons running 12.94 @ 108 mph. Until now, the best slicks / gear combo for me was 26x10 and 4.10. It could use the whole power band and optimize my time.

Next spring, I'll install a V2 SQ-Trim w/ Anderson 4" power pipe so I should trap @ around 115 mph which is WAY too high for a 26x10 and 4.10 combo.

Here's the problem:
1) The car currently sits on Sportlines so 28" slicks will obviously rub
2) I'd like to keep the 4.10 gear because Vortech people claim it eliminates any lag found w/ a 3.73 or 3.55
3) M/T don't offer any 27" slick which would be the best for me

What would you do?
1) Change the gear for a 3.73 and stick w/ the 26" slicks
2) Install higher springs and control arms to ensure that 28" won't rub
3) Try to find rare 27" slicks, ex.: M&H ??

Thanks for your help.
Click to expand...
You weren't looking hard enough. Micky Thompson makes an E/T Street in a 27x10.5

http://store.summitracing.com/partd...4294923107+4294922134+400206+115&autoview=sku

Hoosier also offers a 27x10.5" size slick.
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...4294923107+4294922134+400343+115&autoview=sku

You're not the only one who's searched out taller tires for the track. My Cougar comes with a 26.85" tall tire as standard size.
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Mar 2, 2007
#3
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #3
ET Streets don't stick as well.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 2, 2007
#4
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #4
Xcessiv said:
ET Streets don't stick as well.
Click to expand...

Tell that to the guys running 10's on them. They're E/T steets, not E/T street radials. They'll stick.

Otherwise, try the Hoosier Quick times I suggested. One of the guys over at TCCOA runs 10.5's@130mph with a full weight T-Bird and cut's 1.6's with them.
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Mar 2, 2007
#5
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #5
https://www.hoosiertire.com/Drtire.htm QTP's is what gear banger was refering too (Quick Time Pros). A guy in my car club runs low, low tens in his Subaru (2.5rs swapped with sti motor and built and has some turbos and pistons and stuff lol) - he even lifts the front tires WITH AN AWD CAR LOL!
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Mar 2, 2007
#6
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #6
Xcessiv said:
ET Streets don't stick as well.
Click to expand...

The ET Streets have the same M5 compound as the other small 28" or less ET Drags. The only difference between the ET Streets and the ET Drags is that ET Streets have siping cut into them to help control water if you encounter a wet road. But we all know that even with an ET Street, trying to drive on a wet road with an ET Street is like trying to ride a bicycle on a frozen lake.
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Mar 2, 2007
#7
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #7
LaserRed01GT said:
The ET Streets have the same M5 compound as the other small 28" or less ET Drags. The only difference between the ET Streets and the ET Drags is that ET Streets have siping cut into them to help control water if you encounter a wet road. But we all know that even with an ET Street, trying to drive on a wet road with an ET Street is like trying to ride a bicycle on a frozen lake.
Click to expand...
Ain't it L8 for the 26" ET Drags and M5 for the 27" ET Streets?

Edit:

Chart

Medium------------------------------Soft
B1 M7 M5 R2 R1 L8 L7 M9 B2 L4 M2
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Mar 2, 2007
#8
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #8
Both 10.5 tires come in the M5 compound, which is much stickier than the L compounds.

http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/strip.php?item=ETDrag
http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/strip.php?item=ETStreet
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 2, 2007
#9
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #9
I know Ford does not made them. But why does everybody ignore the 3.90:1 gear ratio?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 2, 2007
#10
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #10
Stan Weiss said:
I know Ford does not made them. But why does everybody ignore the 3.90:1 gear ratio?
Click to expand...

Cause they're for girls.....right Kevin!
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Mar 2, 2007
#11
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #11
LaserRed01GT said:
Both 10.5 tires come in the M5 compound, which is much stickier than the L compounds.

http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/strip.php?item=ETDrag
http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/strip.php?item=ETStreet
Click to expand...
Where did you find this info? I didn't find any source stating that M5 > L8.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Mar 2, 2007
#12
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #12
Xcessiv said:
Where did you find this info? I didn't find any source stating that M5 > L8.
Click to expand...

http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/tech.php?bulletin=s1

You can't just go by the compound's hardness/softness rating. It all depends on the sidewall contruction, compound used, and intended tire use.

The ET Streets with M5 compound are just as sticky as the ET Drags with the M5 compound.

M9 is the most aggressive compound for a door slammer tire.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 2, 2007
#13
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #13
Gearbanger 101 said:
Cause they're for girls.....right Kevin!
Click to expand...

The 3.90:1 and 26 inch tire gives him more toque multiplication at the wheel than the 4.10:1 and the 28 inch tire.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Mar 2, 2007
#14
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #14
Well I bought some used M/T Drags for 100 bucks and the are the lighest tire with the softest side wall I have ever seen. If the et streets are like this I doubt I would want to drive them on the street.

They are 26x10x15. Last year I was trapping between 119-121 on my last test and tune. That was with stock 3.23's. This year I will have 3.73's?
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Mar 3, 2007
#15
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #15
Well there is the DOT approved ET Street which has a non-radial wrinkle side wall design like this:

View attachment 399557

Then there is the DOT approved ET Street Radial that has a radial bias-ply design like a traditional radial street tire like this:

View attachment 399559

Then to add even further confusion, there is the 2nd version of M/T's ET Street Radial that is the same as the above ET Street Radial just in a different tread design and different sizes:

View attachment 399561

This is M/T's ET Drag Radial:

View attachment 399563
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Mar 3, 2007
#16
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #16
I agree with Stan that the 26" tire 3.90 tire gear combo would probably work best for you and save you some work.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Mar 4, 2007
#17
  • Mar 4, 2007
  • #17
LaserRed01GT said:
Well there is the DOT approved ET Street which has a non-radial wrinkle side wall design like this:

View attachment 399205
Click to expand...



that one is the one a 10 sec 03 cobra in the club drove on the street last night.

he said it drives 'funny'. he said it hoooooooooks just fine.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 4, 2007
#18
  • Mar 4, 2007
  • #18
Yeah, the problem with running non-radial case style slick on the street is that they tend to "walk" under hard acceleration and the rim really moves around a lot inside the wheel when cornering. You should probably really only match them to another bias ply style tire or a set of skinnies up front when you’re at the track.

It can be a real handful trying to fight a tire with such a soft sidewall case out back and a hard radial case up front when you're trying to keep it strait going down the 1320.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Mar 4, 2007
#19
  • Mar 4, 2007
  • #19
I drove my 97 Camaro Z28 drag car on the street a lot (the chute was removable) and with the 28x10.5W's it felt like you had regular street tires that were flat on the back. That's because the wrinkle walls aren't made for the street obviously. A lot of guys are now switching to the radial slicks because they are much more stable at the big end. My Z28 would run 8.80's at over 155 all weekend long and those 28x10.5W's felt really weird after about 900-1000ft. They wanted to "walk". I know guys that have switched to a radial and they get the same short times but they say the car feels much more stable at higher speeds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 2013-'14 V6 AT gearing dilemma
  • Colorado66
  • Jan 1, 2019
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
8
Views
5K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Feb 19, 2019
White Wolf
Black Jack: Working up to slicks
  • FastDriver
  • May 29, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 40 41 42
Replies
832
Views
176K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 3, 2026
AeroCoupe
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
C
  • Locked
Expired Rotisserie Restored 1964 1/2 Ford Mustang Coupe Kingsburg, Ca
  • California Stang
  • Dec 19, 2015
  • Classic Mustangs For Sale
Replies
0
Views
5K
Classic Mustangs For Sale Jan 14, 2016
California Stang
C
6
  • Locked
Expired 1987 Mustang Racecar Ai, Aix, Nasa, Scca, Hpde
  • 66gtfb
  • Mar 7, 2014
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
2
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Mar 7, 2014
66gtfb
6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?