• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Bob Kurgan Tuned The Rnh 363 (again)

  • Thread starter Thread starter GroverDill
  • Start date Start date Nov 9, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Nov 10, 2012
#21
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #21
Grover would mind telling what your combo is? Cyl heads, intake, transmission, etc? If nothing else PM me if you don't mind sharing. Doing what you are is my long term goal, and a Dart based engine was in the plan. Another wolf in sheep's clothing as David put it.. A proven recipe would be much appreciated, there are a few local Chevy guys over here with high hp set-ups that need some humility..lol.
 
Reactions: hoopty5.0

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
55
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 10, 2012
#22
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #22
My combo is really nothing special.

Rick built the longblock
Dart IE 363 0 balanced and blueprinted
Super Vic intake with 6061.com elbow
AFR 205
T&D shaft rockers
Jay Allen custom cam
120# trick flow injectors
BS3 stand alone ( so no MAF)
76 GTS Precision turbo (journal bearing and 3" downpipe)
Custom hot and cold side for the turbo set up, flipped 1 3/4" flipped headers for the hotside.
Viper T56 with a Spec Stage3+ clutch (single disk)
Weldon 2035 fuel pump ( loud and way overkill )
Weldon fuel pump controller ( see above )
-12 feed -8 return
built 8.8 with 3.27's

MM suspension K-member, a-arms, coil overs ( front/rear ) HD-T/A, Panhard bar, LCA's
Brembo's
True Forged 3 piece Victory's
Recaro's

ALL Stock!
 

Attachments

  • 84315F47-894C-4C5F-8B24-86A2D6A2BDDD-853-00000097AAFFE0CF.webp
    215.6 KB · Views: 172

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Nov 10, 2012
#23
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #23
Nice. Is that Jay Allen cam solid roller? I'm assuming so since you went with shaft style rockers..

I've got my rear end built, but opted for the tko 600 instead.. wondering if I should have gone t-56.. Oh, well. at least I won't break it.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
55
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 10, 2012
#24
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #24
The cam is a small hydro roller.
 

Attachments

  • CamSpecs.webp
    42.4 KB · Views: 170

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Nov 10, 2012
#25
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #25
WOW! That is small.. lol! Amazing, I never would have guessed! Says a lot for turbos, doesn't it?
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
55
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 10, 2012
#26
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #26
Yup, the entire combo was planned befor the cam was spec'd

954 rwhp at 6k is just silly. I dont rev it but to 6200
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
55
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 10, 2012
#27
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #27
the damn rain!
View attachment 140209
View attachment 140211
 

larrym1961

5 Year Member
Dec 18, 2010
570
36
49
65
Idaho Falls Id
Nov 10, 2012
#28
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #28
Being from Post Falls, I noticed your car has Kootenai County license plates on it. Is it from this area?
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
55
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 10, 2012
#29
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #29
short answer is no.

Fancy was brought back
View attachment 140189
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,787
6,939
214
SW Houston
Nov 10, 2012
#30
  • Nov 10, 2012
  • #30
Grover,

I love your car. Hands down one of the nicest foxes Ive ever seen. But seriously, I have loads of trouble getting my measly 460 whp to the ground. With twice that power on tap, I know it has to be nearly impossible. Did you plan on ever getting it all down or was it built just because? Just curious is all.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
www.goodreads.com
Nov 11, 2012
#31
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #31
Im guessing his torque arm set up helps tremendously over a standard setup with aftermarket parts.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,122
21,290
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Nov 11, 2012
#32
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #32
Torque arm??? Please post pics of it. I've seen the stock photos at MM but haven't seen any other application pics.

Oh... A going down the road video would be sweet too!


Edit: Oh... and how do you get away with running that beast on CA roads?
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
55
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 11, 2012
#33
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #33
The torque arm helps as do the 295 drag radials but if driven aggressively the tires and suspension can only do so much, so yes there is a lot of wheel spin but that is half the fun.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,787
6,939
214
SW Houston
Nov 11, 2012
#34
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #34
Oh I'd giggle like a 5 year old at a petting zoo.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
55
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 11, 2012
#35
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #35
here is about the best shot of the MM HD torque arm


 

Attachments

  • IMG_2484.webp
    162.3 KB · Views: 136
  • IMG_2485.webp
    56 KB · Views: 142
Reactions: hoopty5.0

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
www.crazybobracing.com
Nov 11, 2012
#36
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #36
95BlueStallion said:
Im guessing his torque arm set up helps tremendously over a standard setup with aftermarket parts.
Click to expand...
I'd take stock suspension over a torque arm set up.
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,122
21,290
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Nov 11, 2012
#37
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #37
srtthis said:
I'd take stock suspension over a torque arm set up.
Click to expand...

It's official... you're retarded.
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Nov 11, 2012
#38
  • Nov 11, 2012
  • #38
wow congrats sick numbers bro!! I love your car even if it only made half that hp lol I never get tired of seeing your engine bay .... I had a similiar 100 mile monsoon rain the whole drive home from American Muscle car show in PA last year with billet deletes for wipers was an adventure! .....btw i do have a bigger cam in my car
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
www.crazybobracing.com
Nov 12, 2012
#39
  • Nov 12, 2012
  • #39
Noobz347 said:
It's official... you're retarded.
Click to expand...
far from it... a torque arm is basicly a single center ladder bar set up. where as the stock suspension is a 4 link set up. there is enought stuff in the aftermarket to make the trianglelated 4 link a parallel 4 link and mark it work VERY VERY well. if i was going to build it to handle better id go to a 3 link set up (think 2005+) that has better articulation then our 4 bar set up and then you can still adjust the instant center like you would with our set up. a torque arm set up like a ladder bar your limited to a fixed instant center which SUCKS!
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,122
21,290
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Nov 12, 2012
#40
  • Nov 12, 2012
  • #40
srtthis said:
far from it... a torque arm is basicly a single center ladder bar set up. where as the stock suspension is a 4 link set up. there is enought stuff in the aftermarket to make the trianglelated 4 link a parallel 4 link and mark it work VERY VERY well. if i was going to build it to handle better id go to a 3 link set up (think 2005+) that has better articulation then our 4 bar set up and then you can still adjust the instant center like you would with our set up. a torque arm set up like a ladder bar your limited to a fixed instant center which SUCKS!
Click to expand...

The torque arm is also a 3-link setup. There seem to be awful lot of road coarse racers out there who are extremely happy with this torque arm.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
'86 New Turbo Build First Start/Idle Trouble. Full Tune specs attached
  • Heffay
  • Jul 10, 2022
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 12, 2022
Heffay
H
NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
Finally it all came together.
  • GroverDill
  • Apr 22, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 11, 2012
Flavadave4
U
  • Locked
Expired 1988 Fox Notch With A Termi Swap And Tt
  • undfetd
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
6K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 16, 2014
undfetd
U
  • Locked
Expired Fox Body 1988 Show Car
  • mrbness
  • Apr 1, 2014
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
6
Views
11K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 26, 2014
mrbness
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?