• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

BOOM! Bye bye transmission..

  • Thread starter Thread starter 8YO_VTEC
  • Start date Start date Sep 21, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
8

8YO_VTEC

New Member
Aug 16, 2004
63
0
0
Burke, Va
Sep 21, 2004
#1
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #1
Yeah, to make it simple, Transmission: 1, Adam: 0

Blew up on me tonight at 50 mph...not a fun ride, I can tell you that.

*sigh*
 
F

Flash Gordan

New Member
Sep 11, 2004
17
0
0
The southern end of the great state of New Jersey
Sep 21, 2004
#2
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #2
OUCH!!!! Are you going to be able to rebuild it or are you going to just find a replacement?
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 21, 2004
#3
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #3
Well you found the weakest point in the drivetrain. I found mine too, although my tranny lasted a long time, until the spec clutch go ahold of it with a powershift.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 21, 2004
#4
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #4
Oh btw, you can find T-5's on Ebay and the classifieds cheap, and there are some great rebuild places out there.

I went with the TKO 500.
 
8

8YO_VTEC

New Member
Aug 16, 2004
63
0
0
Burke, Va
Sep 21, 2004
#5
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #5
i was just crusing, that was the thing, shifted from 4th to 5th and BOOM! shook the car, i shut off the motor cause i didn't know wtf happened, drove off into the grass...not a good night :-/

im thinking about the one from summit. Ford Motorsports Super Duty trans with the 2.95 low gearing. friend was explaining transmissions to me a little, said that would be a good low end torque tranny. since i'd like to spray on the motor (a rebuilt, maybe 306 with lots of go fast goodies) i think that it'd be not a bad idea. i dunno what that tranny can hold tho?

man what a ****ty night...i made my stop at the liquor store tonight. i think its justified...
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 22, 2004
#6
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #6
Don't waste your money on one of those "Super Duty World Class" T-5's, get a Tremec or a G-Force T-5.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 22, 2004
#7
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #7
TKO's are worth the money. As far as a G force t5 goes I would not buy them. For the same price you could damn near buy a t56. The case of a t5 is the weakest link not the internals which is what they upgrade.
 
8

8YO_VTEC

New Member
Aug 16, 2004
63
0
0
Burke, Va
Sep 22, 2004
#8
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #8
tremmok 3550. someone educate me. i dont understand tranny's for anything so please explain it to a 5 year old..
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Sep 22, 2004
#9
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #9
tremec 3550. its an upgraded transmission. look them up online, lots of people use them. great transmission if you have the money.

you need a new bellhousing, clutch, and some other things to fit one. i have a t5-z spec and its supposed to be rated for 450 hp. has the 2.95 first gear also, and a little higher geared overdrive if you have gears.

got mine from a guy with an even lower overdrive and some other modifications done to it for $700 damn near brand new.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Sep 22, 2004
#10
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #10
88SC, to clarify for VTEC - a stock Z-spec does not handle 450 horses, correct? it sounds like you had one built. (dont want him to think a Z spec he might get out of a junker is gonna be that stout).

i too second the Tremec (non T5). if you have plans of spirited use - it is the way to go.
i would say that you should be positive that the trans took a dump and not an ancillary component (not saying you dont know that - just that you did not provide much extra info).

you could rebuild yours - if you are mech inclined and can watch a video; you could probably tackle a rebuild (for now).
just options.
good luck.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Sep 22, 2004
#11
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #11
oh yeah, if interested, here is a current thread with some general info on fitment, etc.
good luck.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=503123
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Sep 22, 2004
#12
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #12
hissin, i believe that is the stock rating for it.

i did a little searching when i was in the market for my new transmission. there was a t-5 mustang transmission history page. had all the specs for years, ect.

it said something along the lines of, will handle 450 hp fine as long as its not launched at the track all the time. so 450hp in a street car, flywheel rating i imagine too. so 400 rwhp roughly on the street.

i plan on a built 302 with 5 psi, so it should work fine for me
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Sep 22, 2004
#13
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #13
88SC_GT said:
hissin, i believe that is the stock rating for it.

i did a little searching when i was in the market for my new transmission. there was a t-5 mustang transmission history page. had all the specs for years, ect.

it said something along the lines of, will handle 450 hp fine as long as its not launched at the track all the time. so 450hp in a street car, flywheel rating i imagine too. so 400 rwhp roughly on the street.

i plan on a built 302 with 5 psi, so it should work fine for me
Click to expand...
i think you are right - thank you for correcting me. i had a lower number in my head and what i think it might be: IIRC, the Z specs were rated at 310-335 ft/lb or torque (i have read each number in different places). stands to reason that it should support that much HP - torque is what kills the trannies. well, that and non-street tires.


EDIT: just read a little - you are right on with the HP rating.
 

bmorrisj

Member
Sep 26, 2003
449
0
17
Buena Park, CA
Sep 22, 2004
#14
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #14
haha same happened to me last month, except i was in 5th doing 70 on the freeway, it popped out of gear, now i can only use 4th with no syncro....i can move the stick all around with the clutch out but 4th still works....im going to start pulling the tranny today.....
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Sep 22, 2004
#15
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #15
What about a Richmound? I hear thous things are bullet proof.
 
8

8YO_VTEC

New Member
Aug 16, 2004
63
0
0
Burke, Va
Sep 22, 2004
#16
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #16
thanks guys. I didn't get around to reading up on all the posts last night...needless to say after losing a lot of money I started pounding some shots with a friend...I tried to read a little in 5.0 Mustang and Superfords about the new TKO 500 and TKO 600 trannys (page 100 of June 2004) but I didn't understand too much of it. I prefer to give my transmission problems to someone else. Too complicated for me. Anybody that knows anything about this tranny think its worth it? From my understanding, I'll need a new bell housing, custom crossmember, shortened driveshaft, and a new clutch. lookin at like 2,500 probably all new. blech...
 
J

Js5ohLX

Member
Apr 5, 2004
287
0
16
Ohio
Sep 22, 2004
#17
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #17
If you get a Tremec 3550, you need to slightly modify your crossmember, and get a new bellhousing. Your stock driveshaft will work. I did a swap, and I'm not sure if the stock quadrant I have was junk or it takes a different adjustment, but I had to rig my quadrant to be able to get it in gear. You'll love a tremec over the t-5.
 
M

mooktank

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
237
0
0
Sep 22, 2004
#18
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #18
does a TKO500 require a new DS. I know it needs a new clutch right? and the 3550 uses a regular clutch. All you need is the bellhousing right?
 
8

8YO_VTEC

New Member
Aug 16, 2004
63
0
0
Burke, Va
Sep 22, 2004
#19
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #19
quadrant? DS? sorry, im not good at parts and stuff. i only understand when i see something.

yeah im pretty sure you need a new bellhousing. its a big tranny.
 

ricer-roni

New Member
Aug 2, 2004
69
0
0
Sep 22, 2004
#20
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #20
I am kinda wondering about the Richmond Trannies too. Here is something from there website about the ford T5 replacement:1984 - 1993 (5.0 L) Includes cross member and
speedometer hook-up kit. Bellhousing must be replaced
with Lakewood p/n 15202, or equivalent. May also use
79’ - 83’ Mustang V-8 bellhousing.

I know they are used with high horsepower Chevies, so why not a 5.0. Anyone know anything about them.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
354
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
211
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
B
Rear quarter window regulator
  • BADAZZOMBIE08
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
104
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Mar 29, 2026
BADAZZOMBIE08
B
S
1998 Mustang Gt Rattling sound, cannot locate. Video included
  • studerman1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
184
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2026
studerman1
S
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jun 13, 2026
427nostang
4
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?