• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Boost question after rebuilt and head work

  • Thread starter Thread starter YELLOW 94
  • Start date Start date Aug 19, 2008
Y

YELLOW 94

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
428
0
17
Rio Rancho NM
Aug 19, 2008
#1
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #1
Before I rebuilt my engine my boost gauge was reading 12psi. For the rebuild I went 20 over on the cylinders and ported the heads. This is the only change that was done to the engine.

I went to the dyno on friday and was watching the boost gauge and I only saw 8lbs of boost. Why do you think the boost is down. On the first pull I only saw 5 pounds of boost so we tightened the belt. 8lbs was on the 2nd and 3rd pull.

This weekend I gonna go a compression test to see if maybe I have valve hung open, or just go ahead and readjust all the valve.

Any thoughts would help. By the way the car put down 410 at the wheels uncorrected with 8 degrees of initial timing.

Thanks
Orlie
 

Yellow302

Member
Mar 2, 2003
789
2
19
NJ
Aug 19, 2008
#2
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #2
higher flow = less back pressure = less boost

so your moving more air but there is less restriction.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Aug 19, 2008
#3
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #3
 
Y

YELLOW 94

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
428
0
17
Rio Rancho NM
Aug 19, 2008
#4
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #4
I have a hard time believing that I could lose 4 pounds of boost on my gauge. I understand what your saying about seeing less boost on the gauge. One thing I did add was a one inche spacer between the intakes. Im thinking that this spacer will add volume to my intake will that contribute to my gauge seeing less boost.

later
Orlie
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Aug 19, 2008
#5
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #5
YELLOW 94 said:
I have a hard time believing that I could lose 4 pounds of boost on my gauge. I understand what your saying about seeing less boost on the gauge. One thing I did add was a one inche spacer between the intakes. Im thinking that this spacer will add volume to my intake will that contribute to my gauge seeing less boost.

later
Orlie
Click to expand...

Did you check for leaks? I highly doubt you would lose 4 pounds of boost based on the modifications you did.

Adam
 
Y

YELLOW 94

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
428
0
17
Rio Rancho NM
Aug 19, 2008
#6
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #6
Im with u Black95GTS I do not believe I could of lost 4 pounds of boost on the gauge. I will look for any leaks in the system.

later
Orlie
 

Yellow302

Member
Mar 2, 2003
789
2
19
NJ
Aug 19, 2008
#7
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #7
ive got some ****ty digital gauge and it changes every time i start the car.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Aug 19, 2008
#8
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #8
YELLOW 94 said:
Im with u Black95GTS I do not believe I could of lost 4 pounds of boost on the gauge. I will look for any leaks in the system.

later
Orlie
Click to expand...

I lost boost with my change (heads & cam) but it was between 2 & 2.5 psi. I am running a speed density setup and there is a MAP psi reading shown on the dyno report. Are these readings only shown because of my setup?
 
Y

YELLOW 94

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
428
0
17
Rio Rancho NM
Aug 19, 2008
#9
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #9
I just thought of this, I also changed my cam, I went from an e cam to a trickflow stage 2 cam. Ill check it out this weekend and report back. Thanks for the help.

later
Orlie
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 19, 2008
#10
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #10
I gotta agree with the folks who say better flow will mean less boost

It should be less but like others have said ... maybe something else
is allowing some of the boost to escape

Grady
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 19, 2008
#11
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #11
Yeah you just need a smaller pulley or larger blower. Aint physics a bitch.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Aug 20, 2008
#12
  • Aug 20, 2008
  • #12
YELLOW 94 said:
I just thought of this, I also changed my cam, I went from an e cam to a trickflow stage 2 cam. Ill check it out this weekend and report back. Thanks for the help.

later
Orlie
Click to expand...

Well that certainly changes things. I'd still check for a leak, but that is a "bigger" cam, so that may be the culprit. Boosted guys pop gaskets on dynos all the time, as I probably don't need to tell you.

Adam
 

Vipersix

Founding Member
Feb 25, 2001
434
0
0
Clarksville, TN
Aug 20, 2008
#13
  • Aug 20, 2008
  • #13
Boost pressures depend primarily on the displacement of the engine, the displacement of the blower, and the drive ratio of the blower. Changing any of these items will alter the resulting pressures experienced. The boost formula: (25.58 x blower displacement x drive ratio) / (engine displacement) - 14.7

For example: 302 cu. in. with a 161 blower and 1.95:1 drive. (25.58 x 161 x 1.95) / 302 = 26.6 - 14.7 = 11.9 psi

Boring .020 over results in 305 cu. in. (25.58 x 161 x 1.95) / 305 = 26.3 - 14.7 = 11.6 psi

Other factors such as camshaft timing, valve size, and port size will also change the boost but I don't think it would be enough to justify a drop of 4 psi.

My vote goes for checking for leaks.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Aug 21, 2008
#14
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #14
How much flow did the cylinder heads pickup after the porting?

Is your boost refrence still pulling from the same spot as before?
 
Y

YELLOW 94

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
428
0
17
Rio Rancho NM
Aug 21, 2008
#15
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #15
To be honest with you, I have no idea what the flow numbers are.

Yes the gauge is located in the same position.

later
Orlie
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Aug 25, 2008
#16
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #16
Depending on how much the heads picked up the boost could drop a good bit.

Check the vaccum line that goes to your boost gauge for kinks, leaks, etc.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Aug 25, 2008
#17
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #17
Another possibility that wasnt mentioned is the belt. Did you check the belt for slippage? Is it tight enough on the pulley?

Let us know if you find the problem.

RC
 
Y

YELLOW 94

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
428
0
17
Rio Rancho NM
Aug 25, 2008
#18
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #18
94GTLaserRC said:
Another possibility that wasnt mentioned is the belt. Did you check the belt for slippage? Is it tight enough on the pulley?

Let us know if you find the problem.

RC
Click to expand...

The belt is tight, I didnt get a chance to look at the car this weekend. So it will have to wait till next week.

later
Orlie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
525
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
586
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
P
High idle issue and leaking after running.
  • PHoffman
  • Dec 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
436
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2024
General karthief
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
334
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?