• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Boss 351: solid flat tappet or solid roller cam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Capt. Slapshot
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2010
C

Capt. Slapshot

New Member
Apr 4, 2002
23
0
1
Hermitage, PA
Dec 29, 2010
#1
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • #1
Here's my dilema. I'm restoring a 71 Boss 351 but am not sure what kind of cam to put in the motor. The last Cleveland I built I put in a Comp Cams 282S Magnum cam (.570 lift intake/exhaust). It was a nice street cam, definately was happy with it, but that was quite a few years ago. For this Boss motor, I'm considering putting a roller cam in it, but I don't want a real radical roller cam. I want to drive the Boss on the weekends & enjoy the car, but be able to open her up when I want to make the Boss shine. I've never had any experience with roller cams, so I need some help. I was looking at the Comp Cams 288R (.623 lift intake/exhaust) and the Lunati RRO-304 (.608 lift intake/exhaust). Lunati also said they have a custom grind of .570 lift on the intake & .595 lift on the exhaust in a roller cam as well. As far as the rest of the engine, 4-bolt block & it will have Hooker Super Comp headers. I'm switching the intake to an original Ford over the counter dual plane intake from 1971 (D1ZX-9425-CA) & an original 1971 Ford over the counter 780 Holley vac sec (D1ZF-9510-VA). I'm wanting to go with that setup over the my original Boss intake/carb. As for tranny/rear end, it's the original wide ratio toploader & 3.91 gears in the rear. I've been also told to have bronze lifter bore bushings if I'm going to a roller cam as well. So basically, which roller cam would be the best streetable cam of those 3 (or are there others) or should I stick with a solid flat tappet like the Comp Cams 282S again? Since this is a Boss 351, anything hydraulic is out...period. Thanks everyone!
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Dec 30, 2010
#2
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • #2
If you are restoring a real BOSS 351, why would you consider anything other than the D1ZZ-6250-B BOSS camshaft?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Dec 30, 2010
#3
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • #3
Go to the Network54 Cleveland forums and search there. There have been a number of cam related threads recently. The Boss cam is a good cam, but I would take advantage of modern lobe design and get something that will make more power.

Ford 335 "Cleveland" Series Engine Forum: solid flat tappet cams vs hydraulic roller cams

There's a link to one of the recent threads.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Dec 30, 2010
#4
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • #4
Hmmm… The BOSS 351 was the best 1/4 mile time, in stock form, of any 65-73 Mustang. I can see modifying a 71 H code for power, but a BOSS? They only made 1806 of them.
 
C

Capt. Slapshot

New Member
Apr 4, 2002
23
0
1
Hermitage, PA
Dec 30, 2010
#5
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • #5
2+2GT said:
If you are restoring a real BOSS 351, why would you consider anything other than the D1ZZ-6250-B BOSS camshaft?
Click to expand...

Because I plan on driving & enjoying the car & not limiting it to street driving concourse/trailer queen 100 point show car. If the technology is there, why not use it? Is the value of the Boss going to take that much of hit by using a roller cam? No, it won't. Am I making it a pro-street motor? No, I'm not.



Thanks for the forum link, I'll check it out.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Dec 31, 2010
#6
  • Dec 31, 2010
  • #6
2+2GT said:
Hmmm… The BOSS 351 was the best 1/4 mile time, in stock form, of any 65-73 Mustang. I can see modifying a 71 H code for power, but a BOSS? They only made 1806 of them.
Click to expand...

Is it possible to have enough power in stock form? I say NO.

I wouldn't look down on someone for storing the original motor and building something to run more often, especially when it's a collectible car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
661
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
N
Engine 302 cam in 351w possible ?
  • nelio tapia
  • Oct 24, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 18, 2020
KOOKAS67
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?