• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

breadbox intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbonella
  • Start date Start date Jun 4, 2009

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Jun 4, 2009
#1
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #1
Does anyone have any experiences or opinions on Downs Ford's Upper "breadbox" intake on GT40 lower? I have a GT40 upper/lower and was wondering if these uppers are worth any extra flow-power? NA street car...
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jun 4, 2009
#2
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #2
Not worth it on a NA application, unless you're planning on turning 7,000+ RPM.
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Jun 4, 2009
#3
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #3
StangGT1995 said:
Not worth it on a NA application, unless you're planning on turning 7,000+ RPM.
Click to expand...

ok, that wouldn't work for me. They've been out for ages, but I never really knew the applications. Thanks for the info
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 4, 2009
#4
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #4
whats the combo?
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Jun 4, 2009
#5
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #5
90lxcoupe said:
whats the combo?
Click to expand...

357 windsor, forged crank/ h rods
venolia 10.5:1 pistons
speedpro rings
ported victor jr's
b-303
77mass
75 throttlebody
30 lb injectors
GT40 upper/ported lower
Tremec 3550
3:73
street car. I never race
i figured maybe the Downs upper would be better than my non ported GT40?
plus there are reasonably priced $385? or something close
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 4, 2009
#6
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #6
you would definitly benifit from the boxed upper. Just because your not revving the motor past 7k dosent mean it wouldnt help, that GT40 is gonna be a bottleneck

My advice to you would be to sell that GT40 intake, you could get decent money for it and buy a better flowing intake, your motor sounds pretty stout, get an RPM II, Victor5.0, Systemax II, or a Trick flow R-series.

Also some box uppers require aftermarket fuel rail to work. Not sure about the downs, but the TFS one does.
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Jun 4, 2009
#7
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #7
90lxcoupe said:
you would definitly benifit from the boxed upper. Just because your not revving the motor past 7k dosent mean it wouldnt help, that GT40 is gonna be a bottleneck

My advice to you would be to sell that GT40 intake, you could get decent money for it and buy a better flowing intake, your motor sounds pretty stout, get an RPM II, Victor5.0, Systemax II, or a Trick flow R-series.

Also some box uppers require aftermarket fuel rail to work. Not sure about the downs, but the TFS one does.
Click to expand...

I was always under the impression that a systemax would bolt right on to my 351. I hear GREAT things about that intake, but I have always ruled it out due to the motor being 351 based? I have heard great things about the Trick Flow R-series, but my car is never raced and I enjoy having as much streetable torque as possible. Would that intake take a little grunt out of my bottom end? A little is fine as guess, but a lot would not be in my best interest. Thanks for the advice thus far bud!
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jun 4, 2009
#8
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #8
rbonella said:
I was always under the impression that a systemax would bolt right on to my 351. I hear GREAT things about that intake, but I have always ruled it out due to the motor being 351 based? I have heard great things about the Trick Flow R-series, but my car is never raced and I enjoy having as much streetable torque as possible. Would that intake take a little grunt out of my bottom end? A little is fine as guess, but a lot would not be in my best interest. Thanks for the advice thus far bud!
Click to expand...

i had the regular trickflow-R series on my 347 and it was fine
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 4, 2009
#9
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #9
The R is by no means a race only intake, my car is snappy as shiiiiit with the R-intake, its all about the combo, the camshaft has more to do with losing the low end than the intake.

My tuner actually reccomended using the box upper because power was falling off at 5800, but the tq curve on my motor is pretty flat, there is a pic of my dyno sheet in my progress thread.

If you do go with the R intake do yourself a favor and get the 90mm opening in the upper. The 75mm uses a longer bolt through the center of the air path in the intake, with the 90mm uppers, it uses a stud and the opening in CNC milled, much better product, even if you use a 70mm TB, the design is just smarter with the larger opening.
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Jun 4, 2009
#10
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #10
90lxcoupe said:
The R is by no means a race only intake, my car is snappy as shiiiiit with the R-intake, its all about the combo, the camshaft has more to do with losing the low end than the intake.

My tuner actually reccomended using the box upper because power was falling off at 5800, but the tq curve on my motor is pretty flat, there is a pic of my dyno sheet in my progress thread.

If you do go with the R intake do yourself a favor and get the 90mm opening in the upper. The 75mm uses a longer bolt through the center of the air path in the intake, with the 90mm uppers, it uses a stud and the opening in CNC milled, much better product, even if you use a 70mm TB, the design is just smarter with the larger opening.
Click to expand...

That sounds like good advice, I would have probably picked the 75mm opening thinking the 90 was over kill, but that makes total sense. Another subject...my cam is an old b303, i know its old tech, but it works for me due to me not being a racer. My car is a street car and I love street torque with good response and snap. Could you advise me on a nice cam to go with a TFS R intake (in the near future) Your combo sounds great! NA, snappy, bustin out mid 11's ALL DAY!!! What cam would you recommend to bring this 357 into the 21st century? Thanks again for the info......Coupes Rock!
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Jun 4, 2009
#11
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #11
anyone know where u can get a downs intake?
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 5, 2009
#12
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #12
rbonella said:
That sounds like good advice, I would have probably picked the 75mm opening thinking the 90 was over kill, but that makes total sense. Another subject...my cam is an old b303, i know its old tech, but it works for me due to me not being a racer. My car is a street car and I love street torque with good response and snap. Could you advise me on a nice cam to go with a TFS R intake (in the near future) Your combo sounds great! NA, snappy, bustin out mid 11's ALL DAY!!! What cam would you recommend to bring this 357 into the 21st century? Thanks again for the info......Coupes Rock!
Click to expand...

COMP Cams: Nitrous HP™

Any one of these cams will work well, dont let them scare you, they seem like radical cams, but COMP makes a good product, I have the 282 cam in my car, and i was afraid the car wasnt going to drive for beans with it... But there is no difference in driveability from my E-cam. If i was you, i'd go with any one of those. Ported victor jr's with one of those cams and an R-intake would be a nice street combo.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jun 5, 2009
#13
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #13
Save the box intake for an engine with pressurized induction or one that runs circle tracks above 5500 RPM all the time. In this case, it won't make any difference how many cubic inches you have, a good flowing long runner intake manifold will outperform a box intake on a street driven car.

What makes for good street response is long runners. The longer runners produce more torque at lower RPM which is right were a street driven car lives most of the time. Box intakes have very short runners, so they give away more low end torque than the pick up from better flow characteristics.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 5, 2009
#14
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #14
jrichker said:
Save the box intake for an engine with pressurized induction or one that runs circle tracks above 5500 RPM all the time. In this case, it won't make any difference how many cubic inches you have, a good flowing long runner intake manifold will outperform a box intake on a street driven car.

What makes for good street response is long runners. The longer runners produce more torque at lower RPM which is right were a street driven car lives most of the time. Box intakes have very short runners, so they give away more low end torque than the pick up from better flow characteristics.
Click to expand...

LOL whatever you say. On the street or on the track a well built combination will be faster.

I love my bread box!



I've shortened the runners 1/2" and I still make over 300rwtq before 3,000rpms in my little 331cid

 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 7, 2009
#15
  • Jun 7, 2009
  • #15
how did yo get a NA 331 to make 450 at the tires?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jun 7, 2009
#16
  • Jun 7, 2009
  • #16
Best street performance come with a broad, flat torque curve that starts about 2200 RPM and doesn't drop off until you get past 5200 RPM. That's what makes the 03-04 Cobras killer street machines. No matter how slow you are going, mash the throttle and you are instantly flying. No waiting for the revs to climb into that sweet spot...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Trick Flow Series R to Box R Upper Intake Road Block
  • Habu135
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
Habu135
J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
157
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
69
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
224
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
307
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?