• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

building first engine which one?? 302/306/ or 331

  • Thread starter Thread starter buff531
  • Start date Start date May 2, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
B

buff531

Founding Member
May 11, 2000
1,931
0
36
Hanover Park, IL
May 3, 2005
#21
  • May 3, 2005
  • #21
plus i dont see why 5.0 mustang magazine would do a huge article on how well and good DSS is if everyone is saying they suck... why would one magazine tell all its subscribers that DSS is excellent when reality everyone says they suck?
 

ninjacoupe

New Member
Jul 6, 2003
174
0
0
NY
May 3, 2005
#22
  • May 3, 2005
  • #22
buff531 said:
plus i dont see why 5.0 mustang magazine would do a huge article on how well and good DSS is if everyone is saying they suck... why would one magazine tell all its subscribers that DSS is excellent when reality everyone says they suck?
Click to expand...

Maybe its the 2 page full color ad's they run every month.
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
May 3, 2005
#23
  • May 3, 2005
  • #23
Do it right the first time and get the 393 or 408. And anyone that tells you a 351w swap is difficult or expensive is full of . Easiest best cubic inch investment ever. Get some real, reliable, cost effective power. TRUST ME you'll be glad you did. If you're dead set on the 302 based engine tho go with the 347 hands down. But if you do your homework on windsor swaps like I did, you'll be glad. Remember the mm&ff 393 with the stock unported E7's that made 380 hp and close to 500 ft lbs of torque... Just imagine what you could do with a decent set of heads .


From the club owner and president of Stangers against costly cubic inches.
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
May 3, 2005
#24
  • May 3, 2005
  • #24
ninjacoupe said:
Maybe its the 2 page full color ad's they run every month.
Click to expand...

AHMEN!!!! money talks.
 
B

buff531

Founding Member
May 11, 2000
1,931
0
36
Hanover Park, IL
May 4, 2005
#25
  • May 4, 2005
  • #25
no they had a 5 page article on how well their engines are assembled, why to go with certian parts, cetain parts DSS makes, and what not.

then i even pulled ALL my old 5.0 mages and MM&FF mags and found a few more "articles" on them... not their ads... actuall articles.

again whywould two seperate magazine companies write so many dam articles on one company if they are crap like everyone is saying??? what gives?
 

Fishhawk

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
281
0
0
Michigan City, Indiana
May 4, 2005
#26
  • May 4, 2005
  • #26
buff531 said:
plus i dont see why 5.0 mustang magazine would do a huge article on how well and good DSS is if everyone is saying they suck... why would one magazine tell all its subscribers that DSS is excellent when reality everyone says they suck?
Click to expand...
See all the DSS adds in their magazine? That answer your question? Back in the day when DSS was in Lombard or before, on Belmont Ave. on Chicago's NW side. They were the best. Now that they are spitting out crate motors by the hundreds they have lost some of their quality control. Maybe since you're so close to them you could keep an eye on what they are doing and make sure they don't botch the job, but I have heard nothing but horror stories lately about what they are building. Have you checked with Fox Lake? PER Performance?
 
B

buff531

Founding Member
May 11, 2000
1,931
0
36
Hanover Park, IL
May 4, 2005
#27
  • May 4, 2005
  • #27
no can you post their website?

heres the engine builders i know of...

DSS
Keith Craft
CHP
FOX Lake
PER Performance
FPS

do all these builders besides DSS make quality blocks? A salesman just came back from DSS and told me that place is immaculate. VERY VERY clean and just awsome how they build the engines... said they had them all lined up in a line and just go down buliding like 6 at a time...

i can see where the quality issues come out of.. if there building 6 at a time.... they are not putting 100% attention to the one block they are building... instead they go from one block and bolt on the crank, to the next and do the same thing and so on.... then they go back to the first and start on the next part....
 
B

buff531

Founding Member
May 11, 2000
1,931
0
36
Hanover Park, IL
May 4, 2005
#28
  • May 4, 2005
  • #28
Well i just called CHP and FPS to speak about purchasing a block and what they recommended...

CHP was EXTREMELY un helpful. sounded like he didnt even want to speak with me and i asked for help on which way to go and he didnt even ask what i was looking to do..

FPS on the other hand... that guy i talked to was great. He took the time to EXPLAIN everything!!!!!

anyway he told me he would recommend a 331 or a 347 both are the same price and he said the cost for you to go with a 306 to a 331 is marginal. if your going to do it might as well do the 331 or the 347... i asked about all those rumors and he said that there are no oil problems and he has known people who have driven the crap out of 347's and seen them go 100,000 miles!!!!!!!!! the engine comes with all forged internals and he said that he can get me imported aluminum australian heads that are ported for about 500-600 dollars cheaper than the AFR's i was currently going to go with and they flow just as good.

how do you guys feel about 331's vs. 347's??? theres about a 20 hp difference and 20 ft/lbs of torque difference...
 
B

buff531

Founding Member
May 11, 2000
1,931
0
36
Hanover Park, IL
May 4, 2005
#29
  • May 4, 2005
  • #29
hey guys just looking for a response to my last post that is all. TTT!
 

ninjacoupe

New Member
Jul 6, 2003
174
0
0
NY
May 4, 2005
#30
  • May 4, 2005
  • #30
buff531 said:
hey guys just looking for a response to my last post that is all. TTT!
Click to expand...

The 347 vs 331 topic is so overdone. Some people feel 331 is more reliable...to each his own.
 
Q

qplk11

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
82
0
0
Maryland
May 4, 2005
#31
  • May 4, 2005
  • #31
Just to warn you, I've heard bad things about FPS on this board. Same with DSS as you found out. I am in the same situation as you but I may go with a 351. Seriously, you should at least check with Rick 91GT about assembling something for you. Who knows, he may even get the parts cheaper than you can.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
704
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
799
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
G
Fox engine swaps
  • Gravity
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
347
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2025
2000xp8
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
483
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
611
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?