• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Built 306 Need Efi Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter 306N/A
  • Start date Start date May 1, 2013

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 1, 2013
#1
  • May 1, 2013
  • #1
1989 306 made 362 hp 358 tq @ 6200 rpm on engine dyno with carb .. now in car with stock maf/inj/computer. seems to run good, but should i upgrade? and what to upgrade? seems like there so many maf/inj/tb out there..
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,255
204
South Jersey
May 1, 2013
#2
  • May 1, 2013
  • #2
We are going to need more info. What kind of parts now and what kind of goals do you have?
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 1, 2013
#3
  • May 1, 2013
  • #3
it has afr 165 heads cobra intake comp cam prob pistons scat rods 5,400 lenght 1.6 rockers stock crank few more things just want a fast n/a street car
Need the best maf sensor and injector size to go with my set up ??????? maybe t/b if i realy need it ??
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 1, 2013
#4
  • May 1, 2013
  • #4
had a buddy build the motor but doesnt know to much on the efi stuff on fords
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
May 1, 2013
#5
  • May 1, 2013
  • #5
The injectors are too small for your current setup if it made 362 HP with a carb.

Fuel injector sizing & injector photos

Revised 11-Dec-2011 to add larger injector sizes to injector table

Injector HP ratings: divide flow rating by.5 and multiply the result by the number of injectors. This uses a 100% duty cycle. These ratings are for naturally aspirated engines at the flywheel.

Example:
19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP
36/.5 = 72, 72 x 8 = 576 HP
42/.5 = 84, 84 x 8 = 672 HP

The preferred duty cycle is about 85% maximum, so for a safety factor multiply the final figure times .85.

19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP x .85 = 258 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP x .85 = 326 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP x .85 = 408 HP
36/.5 = 72, 72 x 8 = 576 HP x .85 = 490 HP
42/.5 = 84, 84 x 8 = 672 HP x .85 = 571 HP

Remember that the above ratings are at 39 PSI. Increasing the pressure will effectively increase the flow rating. Example: a 19 lb injector will flow 24 lbs at 63 PSI, and a 24 lb injector will flow 30 lbs at 63 PSI.

See http://users.erols.com/srweiss/#jcalc to get the calculators used in these examples.

Here's the duty cycle explanation. Duty cycle is how much of the time the intake is open the injectors are turned on. The 85% figure means that for 85% of the time the intake valve is open, the injectors are spraying. The idea is that you want some percentage of the duty cycle left over so that you have some room to grow the process.

If you are at 100% and you need more fuel, all you can do is turn up the fuel pressure. That means the whole fuel curve from idle to WOT is affected. Maybe you are already too rich at idle, and turning up the fuel pressure makes it worse. If you had some injector duty cycle left to play with, a custom tune could use that where it is needed. That would not over richen the whole range from idle to WOT.

If you did turn up the fuel pressure, you might be able to change the injector duty cycle to get the air/fuel mixture ratio you want since the injectors will have extra fuel delivery capability.

With larger than stock injectors or higher that stock fuel pressure, you will need an aftermarket MAF that matches the injector size. The MAF “lies” to the computer to get a fuel delivery schedule that meets the engine’s needs and isn’t too rich or too lean. The best strategy is an aftermarket MAF and a custom tune to insure the best air/fuel ratio over all the RPM range.

Don't forget to increase the fuel pump size when you increase injector size or significantly increase the fuel pressure



Diagram courtesy of Tmoss & Stang&2birds


See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds (website host) for help on 88-95 wiring http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/ Everyone should bookmark this site.

Ignition switch wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/IgnitionSwitchWiring.gif

Fuel, alternator, A/C and ignition wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/fuel-alt-links-ign-ac.gif

Complete computer, actuator & sensor wiring diagram for 88-91 Mass Air Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/88-91_5.0_EEC_Wiring_Diagram.gif

Vacuum diagram 89-93 Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustangFoxFordVacuumDiagram.jpg

HVAC vacuum diagram
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/Mustang_AC_heat_vacuum_controls.gif

TFI module differences & pinout
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/TFI_5.0_comparison.gif

Fuse box layout
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/MustangFuseBox.gif
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 1, 2013
#6
  • May 1, 2013
  • #6
I have read like 10000 threads and everyone is running different setups who is rigght and who is wrong ? bbk systems, ford systems, 24 lb injectors, 30lb injectors everyone is different some say stick with ford maf sensor, it reads all the inj sizes.. some say bbk systems lie to the computer and screw with the load or something? just wondering what maf upgrade works best without a KABOOM a few months down the road... Anyone have a setup that works good on a 350-400 hp 306
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
May 2, 2013
#7
  • May 2, 2013
  • #7
Using the 362 Hp figure, looks like 30 Lb injectors, Pro-M 75 MM MAF calibrated for 30 lb injectors.
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 2, 2013
#8
  • May 2, 2013
  • #8
would the stock computer be able to read these changes?
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 2, 2013
#9
  • May 2, 2013
  • #9
and fuel pump is stock.. what pump would be best? is going to big of pump bad also?
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 2, 2013
#10
  • May 2, 2013
  • #10
the cam i put in was al9 user friendly that it said lol runs good so far, but ran it open throtle and killed it checked the plugs was lean but not terrible..
"on stock efi equipment"
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
May 2, 2013
#11
  • May 2, 2013
  • #11
Throttle body size = 65 MM or 70 MM, Accufab for best flow. If you use the 70 MM, it is the best choice for track.

Copied from the FORD RACING PERFORMANCE PARTS catalog:

PROPERLY SIZING FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS


Fuel Pumps
The following information is presented assuming the above information has been taken into consideration regarding BSFC, fuel pressure and specific gravity of the fuel being used. Most fuel pumps for electronic fuel injection are rated for flow at 12 volts @ 40 PSI. Most vehicle charging systems operate anywhere from 13.2v to 14.4v. The more voltage you feed a pump, the faster it spins which, obviously, will put out more fuel. Rating a fuel pump at 12 volts then, should offer a fairly conservative fuel flow rating allowing you to safely determine the pump’s ability to supply an adequate amount of fuel for a particular application.

As previously mentioned, engines actually require a certain WEIGHT of fuel, NOT a certain VOLUME of fuel per horsepower. This can offer a bit of confusion since most fuel pumps are rated by volume, and not by weight. To determine the proper fuel pump required, a few mathematical conversions will need to be performed using the following information. There are 3.785 liters in 1 US Gallon. 1 gallon of gasoline (.72 specific gravity @ 65° F) weighs 6.009 LBS.

To be certain that the fuel pump is not run to its very limit, which could potentially be dangerous to the engine, multiply the final output of the fuel pump by 0.9 to determine the capacity of the fuel pump at 90% output. This should offer plenty of ‘cushion’ as to the overall “horsepower capacity” of the fuel pump.

To determine the overall capacity of a fuel pump rated in liters, use the additional following conversions:
(Liters per Hour) / 3.785 = Gallons
Multiply by 6.009 = LBS/HR
Multiply by 0.9 = Capacity at 90%
Divide by BSFC = Horsepower Capacity
So for a 110 LPH fuel pump:
110 / 3.785 = 29.06 Gallons
29.06 x 6.009 = 174.62 LBS/HR
174.62 x 0.9 = 157 LBS/HR @ 90% Capacity
157 / 0.5 = 314 HP safe naturally aspirated “Horsepower Capacity”

Safe “Horsepower Capacity” @ 40 PSI with 12 Volts
60 Liter Pump = 95 LB/HR X .9 = 86 LB/HR, Safe for 170 naturally aspirated Horsepower
88 Liter Pump = 140 LB/HR X .9 = 126 LB/HR, Safe for 250 naturally aspirated Horsepower
110 Liter Pump = 175 LB/HR X .9 = 157 LB/HR, Safe for 315 naturally aspirated Horsepower
155 Liter Pump = 246 LB/HR X .9 = 221 LB/HR, Safe for 440 naturally aspirated Horsepower
190 Liter Pump = 302 LB/HR X .9 = 271 LB/HR, Safe for 540 naturally aspirated Horsepower
255 Liter Pump = 405 LB/HR X .9 = 364 LB/HR, Safe for 700 naturally aspirated Horsepower

Note: For forced induction engines, the above power levels will be reduced because as the pressure required by the pump increases, the flow decreases. In order to do proper fuel pump sizing, a fuel pump map is required, which shows flow rate versus delivery pressure.

That is, a 255 liter per hour pump at 40 PSI may only supply 200 liters per hour at 58 PSI (40 PSI plus 18 lbs of boost). Additionally, if you use a fuel line that is not large enough, this can result in decreased fuel volume due to the pressure drop across the fuel feed line: 255 LPH at the pump may only result in 225 LPH at the fuel rail.


My Comments:

A lot of people oversize the fuel pump by buying a 255LPH pump thinking that the fuel pump regulator will just pass the excess gas back to the tank. It does, but… Did you ever consider that circulating the fuel around as a 255 LPH pump does will cause the gas to pickup engine heat? What happens to hot gasoline? It boils off! With most of the 5.0 Mustangs having the carbon canister removed or disabled, the car stinks like gas, and the gas mileage drops since the hot fuel evaporates away into the air.
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 2, 2013
#12
  • May 2, 2013
  • #12
great info thanks.. now the al9 computer, can you just plug n play any maf sensor or does it have to be a specific kind?
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 2, 2013
#13
  • May 2, 2013
  • #13
or does the computer have to be chiped or upgraded?
 
R

reldla1996

Member
May 4, 2011
356
22
19
Dayton, Ohio
May 2, 2013
#14
  • May 2, 2013
  • #14
Your computer will be fine. As long as your MAF is calibrated to your injectors, you shouldn't need a chip.
 

1200gt

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
357
40
39
May 3, 2013
#15
  • May 3, 2013
  • #15
jrichker said:
Throttle body size = 65 MM or 70 MM, Accufab for best flow. If you use the 70 MM, it is the best choice for track.


My Comments:

A lot of people oversize the fuel pump by buying a 255LPH pump thinking that the fuel pump regulator will just pass the excess gas back to the tank. It does, but… Did you ever consider that circulating the fuel around as a 255 LPH pump does will cause the gas to pickup engine heat? What happens to hot gasoline? It boils off! With most of the 5.0 Mustangs having the carbon canister removed or disabled, the car stinks like gas, and the gas mileage drops since the hot fuel evaporates away into the air.
Click to expand...

?********So your recommendation for removing the "Carbon Canister" I understand, would be: <Not to do it>? Why do you think guys are removing it - what is their expected gain????
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
May 3, 2013
#16
  • May 3, 2013
  • #16
1200gt said:
?********So your recommendation for removing the "Carbon Canister" I understand, would be: <Not to do it>? Why do you think guys are removing it - what is their expected gain????
Click to expand...

ZERO
Actually it's a negative dollar number if you figure in the loss of gasoline due to no way to capture and recycle the lost gas vapor. The vapor gets recycled into the intake manifold at cruse, so it helps with cruse fuel economy. The gasoline is going to evaporate anyway, so why not put it to good use?

Some of the "excuses" I have heard were cleaning up the engine compartment, or from guys who just removed all the emission control equipment because they thought the car would be faster without it. That's pretty much a myth, since the all the emissions equipment shuts off at Wide Open Throttle. The only thing that can't be turned off by computer control is the small HP loss in the cat converters. Depending on who you believe or how outrageous they want to be, the figures range from 5- 15 HP - I don't recall ever seeing a true dyno test with and without cats to prove any figures.
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 3, 2013
#17
  • May 3, 2013
  • #17
Ok so i will go with the pro m 75mm 30lb inj and 70mm accufab throtle body, 155 pump.. sounds like a good combo?

Now, it is running with stock maf 19lb and stock t/b .. it runs good, no problems at WOT and idles nice, incredible power...

"So the stock set up is only allowing 300 hp at best" ???? new setup will allow up to 60 more hp ? 362 hp that the engine dynoed at with carb.
 

306N/A

Member
May 1, 2013
95
2
9
Ontario
May 3, 2013
#18
  • May 3, 2013
  • #18
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
425
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
785
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?