• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Bullitt intake upgrade?

  • Thread starter Thread starter txredgt
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2011

txredgt

10 Year Member
Oct 26, 2009
1,343
33
69
Mar 1, 2011
#1
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #1
How much 'better' are they over the 01-04 intakes? Is there a huge benefit of them vs the stock piece? Also would it require anymore parts to put on the car like the air intake or TB?
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Mar 1, 2011
#2
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #2
They are a little better than the stock intakes, however there are alot of Bullitt specific parts that are required for the swap. Unless you can find one that has all the swap parts included, it isn't worth it IMO.
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Mar 1, 2011
#3
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #3
Complete write-up on the swap along with a list of required pieces....

Ford Mustang: Mustang Tech: Induction: Bullitt intake install
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Mar 1, 2011
#4
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #4
Its not worth it. The Trick Flow would be a better option. Still not worth it though.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Mar 1, 2011
#5
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #5
Part of the problem with that list is some of the parts are obsolete.
 

txredgt

10 Year Member
Oct 26, 2009
1,343
33
69
Mar 1, 2011
#6
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #6
Nightfire said:
Complete write-up on the swap along with a list of required pieces....

Ford Mustang: Mustang Tech: Induction: Bullitt intake install
Click to expand...

Thats a laundry list of things that I don't want to search for haha.. Its sad that we don't have a great affordable aftermarket intake for our cars..
 
M

Midnight2V

Member
Jan 30, 2009
224
0
16
Oklahoma
Mar 2, 2011
#7
  • Mar 2, 2011
  • #7
With a set of good flowing heads and cams that can make the most of the RPM potential the Trick Flow intake can offer, its a fantastic intake for the price.

The stock intake tops out at about 200 CFM per runner (the bullit doesn't really offer a lot more than that, 210ish I believe) , most ported heads will run out of intake well before reaching their own limit. If you are building your top end to make power beyond 6500 RPM, neither the bullit or the stock PI will benefit you as well as the Trick Flow (or the Edelbrock).
 

Twete

Member
Aug 29, 2010
61
0
7
Kirkland, WA
Mar 2, 2011
#8
  • Mar 2, 2011
  • #8
Midnight2V said:
If you are building your top end to make power beyond 6500 RPM, neither the bullit or the stock PI will benefit you as well as the Trick Flow (or the Edelbrock).
Click to expand...

>6500 sounds VERY rev happy (and way too much fun ), is it possible to build the top end on a 2V using the TFS intake and a nice set of heads & cams such that it flows enough to Tach out like a stock 4V?
 
M

Midnight2V

Member
Jan 30, 2009
224
0
16
Oklahoma
Mar 2, 2011
#9
  • Mar 2, 2011
  • #9
If you are staying naturally aspirated, you only have so much torque to work with. Outside of increasing displacement or a significant bump in compression ratio, you have to use RPM to make more power. The upper torque limit on a 11.0:1 CR mill that I have seen is about 340ft-lbs rwtq (at roughly 4700 RPM). If you managed to make that torque at 6500RPM, which I haven't even heard of, you are only looking at 420 to the wheels.

6500 is just a tune away on a stock rotating assembly. Most quality built shortblocks can easily handle 7000-7500 RPM . A decent set of springs is all you need to fortify your valvetrain to handle more RPM.

Believe it or not, the Trick Flow heads can easily flow enough air to support 8500 RPM on just 4.6 liters (but don't try it without the rest of your setup being able to support that as well). With the right setup, you truly are only limited by your RPM. You will need a full exhaust, a proper cam selection, and an optimized intake setup to feed either TF or ported 2V heads. That includes the TF intake with its very generous 9 liter plenum volume. It will work well to at least 7500 RPM. Beyond that you are looking at a custom sheet metal intake.

It may not be the best combination down low in the RPM range, but as far as peak power and power under the curve is concerned NA, you would have to spool a 4V very high to make more power than a fully built TF 2V setup, and it would need a good bit of work as well just to keep up, let alone exceed the TF setup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
288
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
120
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
285
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
C
Hello from Alabama
  • Carl Moore
  • Sep 6, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
314
The Welcome Wagon Sep 7, 2025
Mac131
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
233
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?