• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

C5OE 289 heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TurboXstang
  • Start date Start date May 26, 2006

TurboXstang

Member
Dec 26, 2003
71
0
6
Melbourne, IA
May 26, 2006
#1
  • May 26, 2006
  • #1
I didn't want too take over anyones thread so i'll start one. I've got a set of (C5OE) 289 heads i got from a friend, What size cc chamber do these haeds have and what kind of compress could be exspected on a 91 302 HO shortblock (forged flat tops)?
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 26, 2006
#2
  • May 26, 2006
  • #2
1. 58cc
2. Rough guesstimate, 10:1-10.5:1
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 26, 2006
#3
  • May 26, 2006
  • #3
Jeez, that small? For some reason I thought the 54s came on the 260s.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 26, 2006
#4
  • May 26, 2006
  • #4
Yup. While the compression sounds great, they don't flow worth a crap.
 

TurboXstang

Member
Dec 26, 2003
71
0
6
Melbourne, IA
May 27, 2006
#5
  • May 27, 2006
  • #5
So would i be better off picking up a set of E7's for it or would having them ported out help (my dad's really good at porting. Or what other junkyard heads (years and what the came on if possible) would be a good choice too try too find. My local salvage yard has alot of older cars and trucks as well as newer stuff.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
May 27, 2006
#6
  • May 27, 2006
  • #6
Ah didn't realize the motor is a 302.
E7s are typically 64cc chambers and run in the 9.5:1 range.
54s will get you in the 10.4:1 range, on the ragged edge of pump gas and iron heads.

You will need hardened seats and new pushrods. Also the rocker arm setup is completely different than the pedestal mount stuff.

So you might look into having your dad port the E7s and run a 1011-2.
Or run the 289 heads and run a 9333 gasket.
 

SHIFTY101EASY

New Member
Feb 24, 2006
129
0
0
May 27, 2006
#7
  • May 27, 2006
  • #7
cleveland heads???
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 27, 2006
#8
  • May 27, 2006
  • #8
Unless you can get some Austalian Cleveland heads(small chambers and ports) for free, you might as well get some aftermarket aluminum Windsors. Even the "2v" 351C heads would probably be borderline big for a 302.

The E7s are around 60-61cc; most 351W heads are 64cc. A good porter could probably get 220/180cfm out of the better stock iron heads(like E7s or D0OEs).
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
May 27, 2006
#9
  • May 27, 2006
  • #9
65ShelbyClone said:
The E7s are around 60-61cc
Click to expand...

Where did you get this from?!?

Maybe with .015 off . . .

The 4 different chambers (on 4 different heads) I have measured have all been 64cc.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 27, 2006
#10
  • May 27, 2006
  • #10
The 351W E7's are the same cc's as the 5.0 heads. 64+ or - 1-2 ccs. Only difference between the two are the bolt holes. If you want flow AND compression port the C5 heads. Only way to equal that with E7's is to mill the crap out of them. The plus side of E7's are the induction hardened seats, but that only goes so deep into the iron. Work them too much and you're back into the same iron the 289 heads have. Another plus to the E7's are they readliy accept the 1.7 "Cobra" roller rockers which can be had used for $100. With a mild cam, they're a good bang for the buck, you get .030 more lift, plus the reduced friction from the roller trunions. Ford says they're good for about 15 hp.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 27, 2006
#11
  • May 27, 2006
  • #11
57fairlane said:
Where did you get this from?!?
Click to expand...

Eh, 90% of the 5.0 forum....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
955
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
213
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
P
Best heads for my build?
  • pettyeod
  • Nov 13, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2023
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?