• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

CAI/tuner on 87 octane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blacksheep06
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2006

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
May 21, 2006
#1
  • May 21, 2006
  • #1
How much HP? Gas prices are just to high for me to go any higher than 87.

The main reason I'm looking into tuning is because I'm about to install the MAC O/R prochamber with my FRRP axel back and I want to get the car running right after installation. I figure since I have to tune after the exhaust, I might as well install a CAI at the same time. But again I want to stay on 87.
 

firestang70

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
114
0
0
Sardinia OH
May 21, 2006
#2
  • May 21, 2006
  • #2
I had a performance 87 tune placed on my car. My buddy had an identical setup other than a 91 tune. We dynoed them back to back he only made 1.5hp and 6 ft/lbs more and that was rear wheel numbers. I know no 2 cars will be the same but. Mine pulls as hard as his. Make sure you just find a good tuner and dyno it. I deal with MDmotorsports in Cincy. Good luck!
 
N

NorthwestGT

New Member
Jan 11, 2006
177
0
0
Pasco, WA
May 21, 2006
#3
  • May 21, 2006
  • #3
Sorry, I don't have any dyno numbers for you. But, I can tell you that with just a CAI from aFe and an 87 octane tune from Paul's High Performance stored in an SCT X-Calibrator 2, the car is running significantly stronger than stock. The tune also fixed the throttle lag. The response is instant.

It'll cost you a few bucks (maybe $700) but I think it is worth it. I've had no driveability problems. The stuff has been in there for a few months now, and it's doing fine. 20 MPG in town. Haven't had much chance to take a road trip, but I think it will do 25-27. In traffic, at low RPM it feels just like stock. At WOT the shifts in my auto are very crisp, and it gets up to highway speed very quickly.
 
J

JLTucker

Member
May 25, 2004
114
0
16
Chesapeake VA
May 22, 2006
#4
  • May 22, 2006
  • #4
We dynoed a automatic on 87 and picked up 20 RWHP and 20 RWTQ. %spd would be a couple higher.
Keep in mind with the tank size of the Mustang, the $.15-$.20 difference in 87 vs.93 comes out to about $2.80 per fill up.
You got to ask your self is 8-10 RWHP worth $2.80?

Good luck.
Jay
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
May 22, 2006
#5
  • May 22, 2006
  • #5
I went ahead and ordered the JLT CAI/Tuner and the MAC offroad prochamber today from brenspeed. I'll make another sound clip of my borlas after I get it all on.
 

jlisle01

New Member
Dec 29, 2004
250
1
0
McAlester,OK
May 22, 2006
#6
  • May 22, 2006
  • #6
No offense but, you can afford a 28,000 dollar car and kick out over 500 bucks for a CAI but $2-$3 a fill up is a concern? The cost of that exhaust setup alone would keep you in gas for months. Go for the 91 tune, it's a mustang- not a hybrid honda!
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
May 23, 2006
#7
  • May 23, 2006
  • #7
jlisle01 said:
No offense but, you can afford a 28,000 dollar car and kick out over 500 bucks for a CAI but $2-$3 a fill up is a concern? The cost of that exhaust setup alone would keep you in gas for months. Go for the 91 tune, it's a mustang- not a hybrid honda!
Click to expand...

My right foot is really heavy, those fill ups come OFTEN. It's just a bad feeling at the gas pump putting premium in a v8. I guess it's more psychological than anything else.
 

jlisle01

New Member
Dec 29, 2004
250
1
0
McAlester,OK
May 23, 2006
#8
  • May 23, 2006
  • #8
I know, filling up these days gives everyone a bad feeling, 87octane or not. I guess I'm just built another way. I refuse to let the prices dampen my fun. Besides, if I start to get depressed I just think of my ex filling up her Suburban and I'm all smiles again.
 

mpentico

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
181
0
0
May 24, 2006
#9
  • May 24, 2006
  • #9
I dyno'd 289 RWHP using the 87 tune from JMS Chip.

Occasionally there was detonation at WOT, but it seems to have gone away.

Now I'm running the 91 tune with a few tweeks of my own.
Frankly, the improvements are not worth going back to the 87.

I average 19MPG driving 300+ miles per week.
Turned over 30K today!

The gas station folks really like me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
242
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
351
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
703
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
956
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
321
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?