• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Calibrated Maf Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edward P. Gary
  • Start date Start date May 22, 2017
E

Edward P. Gary

New Member
Jul 23, 2015
1
0
1
May 22, 2017
#1
  • May 22, 2017
  • #1
Hey, old member with new account and getting back in the mode of Mustang mods. I have a 1990 GT with 24# injectors. I decided to upgrade my old C&L MAF to a calibrated BBK unit with the install of a new cold air intake. The car is running great (swapped out some faulty sensors while I was under the hood), better than ever actually. Idle and horses are sweet.

Anyway, after a bit of a test drive, I threw a check engine light. One of the codes I pulled was 66 (low voltage to MAF). I didn't appear to have this before the new MAF, so my question is this: does the car need to be tuned in order for the A9L to properly work with this setup? I had a dyno tune in the works already, but don't want to bring the car in with malfunctioning sensors, unless that would correct the problem.

Thank you!
 

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
May 22, 2017
#2
  • May 22, 2017
  • #2
Hey, old member getting back in the mode of Mustang mods. I have a 1990 GT with 24# injectors. I decided to upgrade my old C&L MAF to a calibrated BBK unit with the install of a new cold air intake. The car is running great (swapped out some faulty sensors while I was under the hood), better than ever actually. Idle and horses are sweet.

Anyway, after a bit of a test drive, I threw a check engine light. One of the codes I pulled was 66 (low voltage to MAF). I didn't appear to have this before the new MAF, so my question is this: does the car need to be tuned in order for the A9L to properly work with this setup? I had a dyno tune in the works already, but don't want to bring the car in with malfunctioning sensors, unless that would correct the problem.

Thank you!
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
May 22, 2017
#3
  • May 22, 2017
  • #3
Code 66 or 157 MAF below minimum test voltage.

Revised 10-Feb-2014 to add 95-95 Mustang code 157 and 94-95 ECC diagram

Insufficient or no voltage from MAF. Dirty MAF element, bad MAF, bad MAF wiring, missing power to MAF. Check for missing +12 volts on this circuit. Check the two links for a wiring diagram to help you find the red wire for computer power relay switched +12 volts. Check for 12 volts between the red and black wires on the MAF heater (usually pins A & B). while the connector is plugged into the MAF. This may require the use of a couple of safety pins to probe the MAF connector from the back side of it.

Computer connector for 88-93 5.0 Mustangs

Diagrams courtesy of Tmoss and Stang&2Birds

ECC Diagram for 88-90 5.0 Mustangs


ECC Diagram for 91-93 5.0 Mustangs


94-95 Diagram for 94-95 5.0 Mustangs



There are three parts in a MAF: the heater, the sensor element and the amplifier. The heater heats the MAF sensor element causing the resistance to increase. The amplifier buffers the MAF output signal and has a resistor that is laser trimmed to provide an output range compatible with the computer's load tables. Changes in RPM causes the airflow to increase or decrease, changing the voltage output.. The increase of air across the MAF sensor element causes it to cool, allowing more voltage to pass and telling the computer to increase the fuel flow. A decrease in airflow causes the MAF sensor element to get warmer, decreasing the voltage and reducing the fuel flow.

The MAF element is secured by 2 screws & has 1 wiring connector. To clean the element, remove it from the MAF housing and spray it down with electronic parts cleaner or non-inflammable brake parts cleaner (same stuff in a bigger can and cheaper too).

89-90 Model cars: Measure the MAF output at pins C & D on the MAF connector (dark blue/orange and tan/light blue) or at pins 50 & 9 on the computer. Be sure to measure the sensor output by measuring across the pins and not between the pins and ground.

91-95 Model cars: Measure the MAF output at pins C & D on the MAF connector light blue/red and tan/light blue) or at pins 50 & 9 on the computer. Be sure to measure the sensor output by measuring across the pins and not between the pins and ground.


At idle = approximately .6 volt
20 MPH = approximately 1.10 volt
40 MPH = approximately 1.70 volt
60 MPH = approximately 2.10 volt

Check the resistance of the MAF signal wiring. Pin D on the MAF and pin 50 on the computer (dark blue/orange wire) should be less than 2 ohms. Pin C on the MAF and pin 9 on the computer (tan/light blue wire) should be less than 2 ohms.

There should be a minimum of 10K ohms between either pin C or D on the MAF wiring connector and pins A or B. Make your measurement with the MAF disconnected from the wiring harness.

Actually MAF pins C & D float with reference to ground. The signal output of the MAF is a differential amplifier setup. Pins C & D both carry the output signal, but one pin's output is inverted from the other. The difference in signal between C & D is what the computer's input circuit is looking for. The difference in the two outputs helps cancel out electrical noise generated by the ignition system and other components. Since the noise will be of the same polarity, wave shape and magnitude, the differential input of the computer electronically subtracts it from the signal. Then it passes the signal on to an Analog to Digital converter section inside the computer's CPU chip.

See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds (website host) for help on 88-95 wiring http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/

Ignition switch wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/IgnitionSwitchWiring.gif

Fuel pump, alternator, ignition & A/C wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/fuel-alt-links-ign-ac.gif

Computer,. actuator & sensor wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/88-91_5.0_EEC_Wiring_Diagram.gif

Fuse panel layout
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/MustangFuseBox.gif

Vacuum routing
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustangFoxFordVacuumDiagram.jpg
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
May 22, 2017
#4
  • May 22, 2017
  • #4
moderators.. please merge with this guy's duplicate post @karthief
 

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
May 23, 2017
#5
  • May 23, 2017
  • #5
Edward P. Gary said:
Hey, old member with new account and getting back in the mode of Mustang mods. I have a 1990 GT with 24# injectors. I decided to upgrade my old C&L MAF to a calibrated BBK unit with the install of a new cold air intake. The car is running great (swapped out some faulty sensors while I was under the hood), better than ever actually. Idle and horses are sweet.

Anyway, after a bit of a test drive, I threw a check engine light. One of the codes I pulled was 66 (low voltage to MAF). I didn't appear to have this before the new MAF, so my question is this: does the car need to be tuned in order for the A9L to properly work with this setup? I had a dyno tune in the works already, but don't want to bring the car in with malfunctioning sensors, unless that would correct the problem.

Thank you!
Click to expand...

Considering that you didn't have the code with the factory meter, the low voltage code would leave me to believe you have a defective MAF sensor. Unfortunately this does happen.
 

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
May 23, 2017
#6
  • May 23, 2017
  • #6
Okay, so I went back under the hood, reset the the computer, then adjusted the TPS (I was getting a code for that as well). Took the car for a good test run and put it through the motions, it's still running better than ever. No check engine lights, but I ran diag's anyway just for giggles. I'm now getting codes 85 and 67, nothing else. I read that 85 is the charcoal canister, which I don't have connected. I'm just curious if I screwed something up while adjusting the TPS or should I drive the car some more to see if any CEL's come back? I'm not understanding why these codes would suddenly appear when they weren't just the other day.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 24, 2017
#7
  • May 24, 2017
  • #7
Did you reset the ecu after adjusting the TPS?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,862
224
Massachusetts
May 24, 2017
#8
  • May 24, 2017
  • #8
Code 85 is the charcoal canister, and if it's gone, then that's why you have a code for it.

Code 67 is for the neutral Gear circuit. Either the clutch wasn't pressed in during the test procedure, or the T-5 wasn't in neutral. If either of those two conditions were met, then you either have a wiring issue, or the sensor on top of the t5 is failed.

A code 67 won't allow you to proceed to the engine running codes.
 

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
May 24, 2017
#9
  • May 24, 2017
  • #9
vristang said:
Did you reset the ecu after adjusting the TPS?
Click to expand...
No - sounds like I missed a step.

I might add the question: If one sensor is out of whack, could it theoretically cause cascading problems/trigger codes from other sensors?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,862
224
Massachusetts
May 24, 2017
#10
  • May 24, 2017
  • #10
vristang said:
Did you reset the ecu after adjusting the TPS?
Click to expand...


I don't believe you need to. The TPS is baselined each time the car is started. Any value between 0.5 and 1.19 volts is in spec.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 5, 2017
#11
  • Jun 5, 2017
  • #11
Mustang5L5 said:
I don't believe you need to. The TPS is baselined each time the car is started. Any value between 0.5 and 1.19 volts is in spec.
Click to expand...
The RATCH function on the TPS signal only looks for lower values than the current 'idle' RATCH. If the TPS is changed to a higher baseline voltage, then the ecu won't acknowledge it correctly.
It's always better to just reset the ecu...
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 5, 2017
#12
  • Jun 5, 2017
  • #12
Black Sun 5.0 said:
I might add the question: If one sensor is out of whack, could it theoretically cause cascading problems/trigger codes from other sensors?
Click to expand...
Not really...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
  • Locked
Digital Tuning A9l issue or something else
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
262
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
T
Fuel Looking for a little guidance
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
311
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 12, 2025
Noobz347
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
567
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
718
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
212
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?