• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Cam choice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maryland Stang
  • Start date Start date Apr 27, 2007

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Apr 27, 2007
#1
  • Apr 27, 2007
  • #1
Hey all, here's another one...

Okay, I've run countless sims on Desktop Dyno. I know it's not accurate but it is very good at showing trends. I'm down to 2 cams which will remain un-named or specified. These 2 cams had the best "under the curve" numbers I could get. One of them was recommended by BR.

My requirements are:

As bad-azz an idle as I can acheive
Power below 6000
Lift that won't make me have to do anything to the pistons or even bother checking (I'm lazy)
I'm on a budget
My 5.0 is a street car. I may run it at the track one time just to see what it will do. It is not a daily driver.
I have a 5 speed with 3.73 gears.

All numbers start at 2000 rpm and increase by 500 rpm for the next number.

Cam "A" power: 118, 155, 199, 247, 285, 316, 337, 341. Average power for cam "A"= 250

Cam "B" power: 126, 164, 206, 252, 285, 310, 320, 316. Average power for cam "B"= 247

Cam "A" torque: 309, 326, 348, 371, 374, 369, 354, 326. Average torque for cam "A"= 347

Cam "B" torque: 330, 344, 361, 377, 374, 362, 336, 302. Average torque for cam "B"= 348

Cam "A" advertises a "lopey" idle.

Cam "B" advertises a "fair" idle.

Given what little I've revealed here which cam would you choose? One cam has higher peak numbers but they are higher up in the RPMs than the other cam. The other cam has a flatter line but not as good a peak number. Both cams would be acceptable.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Apr 27, 2007
#2
  • Apr 27, 2007
  • #2
I like the look of cam "B" because of the low end torque numbers.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 27, 2007
#3
  • Apr 27, 2007
  • #3
I like cam A because it is making power right up to your shift point of 5500rpm -5800rpm. The averages are so close I doubt you go wrong with either but Personally I think cam B is falling flat on its Face to soon. 5000rpm for a max is a little weak.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
H
Motorsports Cam
  • Hammershop
  • Mar 3, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 3, 2017
Mustang5L5
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Totally Stumped!
  • De-Marko
  • Oct 8, 2014
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
970
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2014
elarm1
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?