• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

cam opinions

  • Thread starter Thread starter shelbe67
  • Start date Start date Feb 25, 2006

shelbe67

Member
Apr 10, 2004
309
0
17
Feb 25, 2006
#1
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #1
I need some opinions on camshafts. I have a comp cams 282hr that I am thinking about installing in my stroker. Its a 351wstrked to 395 cubic inches it will have 11.5:1 compression. victor jr heads and intake 1.6 rr an 850 carb, 13/4 headers a 3000 stall and an aod with 410 gears. Now do you guys think that I should retofit my block for the roller cam or should I just run a hydralic cam as it would be cheaper then the retrofit. If I do use the hydralic cam then which one? Also can I double up my head gaskets to lower the compression a bit? would this be ok? thanks guys appreciate any help
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 25, 2006
#2
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #2
If you can afford the retrofit for the roller, then go for it. But I wouldn't dream of doubling head gaskets to reduce the comp ratio. You're asking for trouble there. Four head bolts per cylinder + aluminum heads + double gaskets = trouble to me.You're not planning on this for a daily driver, so affording 93 octane pump premium shouldn't be a concern.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 26, 2006
#3
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #3
Is the engine still apart and can the piston tops be relieved?

I wouldn't double up head gaskets either. Thick ones are available, and I think that Cometic makes custom ones.

Alternately, IF you have the funds, you could contact a custom cam designer. They can design a cam that would work with your expected compression.
 

shelbe67

Member
Apr 10, 2004
309
0
17
Feb 26, 2006
#4
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #4
I dont really havethe cash but I can save. I dont think 93 is gonna cut it my engine builder said the motor is gonna have 13:1 with a 60cc head , 12 something to one with a 64cc head and if I double the gaskets it will have 11.5:1 which I could live with I was just looking for an alternative to tearing it down again
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 26, 2006
#5
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #5
Go with the largest chambered head you can (if you haven't bought heads yet) Then look for a cam with lots of overlap. You should be OK with 93 premium then. If you get too thick with the gasket, you'll loose some quench and defeat the purpose of the gaskets reducing the comp ratio.
 

shelbe67

Member
Apr 10, 2004
309
0
17
Feb 27, 2006
#6
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #6
what do you mean quench?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 27, 2006
#7
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #7
Quench happens in the area between the piston top and the bottom of the head, outside of the chamber. It serves to extinguish any flame front started by detonation ( spontanious combustion, also how a diesel fires) other than the one started by the sparkplug. If this gap is too large, then it may fail to extinguish these extra flame fronts, and with insufficient octane fuel, you get detonation ( pinging) which will eventually destroy the pistons if it happens too often. A thicker gasket widens this gap. You eventually get to a point where you're defeating the purpose of using the thicker gasket by using one thats thick enough to prevent quench.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Feb 27, 2006
#8
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #8
D.Hearne said:
Quench happens in the area between the piston top and the bottom of the head, outside of the chamber. It serves to extinguish any flame front started by detonation ( spontanious combustion, also how a diesel fires) other than the one started by the sparkplug. If this gap is too large, then it may fail to extinguish these extra flame fronts, and with insufficient octane fuel, you get detonation ( pinging) which will eventually destroy the pistons if it happens too often. A thicker gasket widens this gap. You eventually get to a point where you're defeating the purpose of using the thicker gasket by using one thats thick enough to prevent quench.
Click to expand...

Hearne, you always amaze me! I learn something new everyday just by reading you post lol. :SNSign:
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 27, 2006
#9
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #9
Sometimes I amaze myself
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
801
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Wednesday at 3:41 PM
DTCRAWLEY
D
J
Fox Cam swap gone wrong??
  • Jimmer009
  • Apr 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
579
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2025
Jimmer009
J
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
359
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
Engine Finishing up 331 build
  • RedFury5.0
  • Mar 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
566
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 20, 2025
RedFury5.0
P
Cam spec
  • peter.farina
  • Nov 29, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
309
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
Ric4eyedFox
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?