• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Cam Question for stock Motor.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89RedFoxGT
  • Start date Start date Dec 2, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 3, 2006
#21
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #21
Intake sure....but is it really worth the money spending $150+ dollars for a cam (for a cheapie), not to mention the effort involved removing the entire front end of the motor all the way down to pulling the cam gear....for an extra 6 or 8 horsepower? And when you start getting into odd grinds, the price goes up by quite a bit....I paid over $250 for my camshaft.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 3, 2006
#22
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #22
Well i guess all i can do is talk from experience. F-150 302 5.0L stock intake and heads did a cam swap huge difference in power. Also headers and a off road y-pipe. Night and day difference. I know the 302's in the trucks are rated at less power then the mustangs but mine is a Speed density so you can't go crazy on the cam but it did the trick.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Dec 3, 2006
#23
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #23
the factory cam in your truck was a torquey truck cam at best. In your case, I agree you'd see an entirely different animal by swapping a cam meant for performance into you truck.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 3, 2006
#24
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #24
i still think that a cam swap in a factory 5.0l is a good thing.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 3, 2006
#25
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #25
"Worth the effort" is up to you...but a small aftermarket cam like an E or B would definately liven up a stock engine. The stock cam is built for low end torque and emissions, regardless of how many people make great power with a stock cam. It would be a waste to go any higher than a .500 lift though.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 3, 2006
#26
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #26
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
"Worth the effort" is up to you...but a small aftermarket cam like an E or B would definately liven up a stock engine. The stock cam is built for low end torque and emissions, regardless of how many people make great power with a stock cam. It would be a waste to go any higher than a .500 lift though.
Click to expand...

I agree. And lift would not be where it is at if you were running factory heads and intake. Duration would be. Thats whats going to help it make more ponies.
 
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 3, 2006
#27
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #27
POST GLITCH.....see below.
 
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 3, 2006
#28
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #28
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
"Worth the effort" is up to you...but a small aftermarket cam like an E or B would definately liven up a stock engine. The stock cam is built for low end torque and emissions, regardless of how many people make great power with a stock cam. It would be a waste to go any higher than a .500 lift though.
Click to expand...

This I DO agree with, on the .500 lift comment. Not to mention it'd be pushing the limits on stock valvesprings, IIRC .500 is the recommended limit on stock springs.


If anyone has stock explorer cam specs I'd love to see them, I have stock 5.0 HO cam specs in a book laying around here somewhere.....ah found em! I dont have LSA but here's what I do have...

Okay, stock 5.0 HO camshaft appears to be: .276/.266 (ADV. duration), .445/.445 lift (valve lift at 1.6)

Stock explorer camshaft appears to be: 256/266 adv. duration, .422/.448 (valve lift at 1.6)
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 4, 2006
#29
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #29
OrLackThereof said:
This I DO agree with, on the .500 lift comment. Not to mention it'd be pushing the limits on stock valvesprings, IIRC .500 is the recommended limit on stock springs.


If anyone has stock explorer cam specs I'd love to see them, I have stock 5.0 HO cam specs in a book laying around here somewhere.....ah found em! I dont have LSA but here's what I do have...

Okay, stock 5.0 HO camshaft appears to be: .276/.266 (ADV. duration), .445/.445 lift (valve lift at 1.6)

Stock explorer camshaft appears to be: 256/266 adv. duration, .422/.448 (valve lift at 1.6)
Click to expand...

I could be wrong on this one but i believe the Explorer cam is the same as the '94 302 Thunderbird and the '93 Cobras....which is as you posted much less of a cam than the stock 5.0 HO Mustang cam.

Also about durration being where it's at....totally. Furthermore if you opted for a split duration cam favoring the exhaust you might be even better off...
 
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 4, 2006
#30
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #30
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
I could be wrong on this one but i believe the Explorer cam is the same as the '94 302 Thunderbird and the '93 Cobras....which is as you posted much less of a cam than the stock 5.0 HO Mustang cam.

Also about durration being where it's at....totally. Furthermore if you opted for a split duration cam favoring the exhaust you might be even better off...
Click to expand...

100% in agreement. We all know how weak the E7 heads flow on the exhaust-side, hence the reason for a split cam in the first place. Ford alphabet cams, oddly enough, ignore this deficiency.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 4, 2006
#31
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #31
So far the best cam i've seen for a basic bolt on engine is a TFS Stage 1, with a Stage 2 being better if you've got some really nice heads and intake setup and can run higher RPMs. Of course i haven't played with all the cams out there so i can't say it's THE best, and of course if you've got the cash you can't go wrong with a custom grind either.

I believe the Stage one is like 275/279 duration and something like .499/.510 or .512 lift. The 2 is a pretty sweet cam if you've got nice heads and is close to an X cam but with the split durration and lift, 286/294 duration and 542/563 lift.
 
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 4, 2006
#32
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #32
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
So far the best cam i've seen for a basic bolt on engine is a TFS Stage 1, with a Stage 2 being better if you've got some really nice heads and intake setup and can run higher RPMs. Of course i haven't played with all the cams out there so i can't say it's THE best, and of course if you've got the cash you can't go wrong with a custom grind either.

I believe the Stage one is like 275/279 duration and something like .499/.510 or .512 lift. The 2 is a pretty sweet cam if you've got nice heads and is close to an X cam but with the split durration and lift, 286/294 duration and 542/563 lift.
Click to expand...

The stage 2 is a hell of a mean cam but you need Trick Flow's valvesprings for it.... I run Edelbrock heads, and the springs are rated to .550 lift, so I went with a similar Lunati grind with less lift (.533/.544)

By the way guys, if youre going to compare cams, you're best off comparing duration at .050, as opposed to advertised duration. Most cam manufacturers will read advertised duration at the same location on the lobe, but this isn't always the case, so you can be mislead. Comparing them at .050 insures you're getting a true comparison every time, I pretty much completely ignore advertised duration anymore, unless they dont list it at .050.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Dec 4, 2006
#33
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #33
Get a small one.6-8 lbs will give you the same HP gain if not more from a H/C/I swap plus its better for torque and you will keep your good gas mileage!
 

Chietala

New Member
Sep 21, 2006
111
0
0
Sacramento
Dec 4, 2006
#34
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #34
OrLackThereof said:
I'd still rather see you run an E cam than a B on a streetable setup....B is lumpier and the powerband is pushed higher. And if youre running an AOD, you can get away with a stock converter with an E cam....with the B, forget about it you're going to need a stall converter for it to drive okay.
Click to expand...


You want the powerband were your going to use it... I dont think he's towing jetskies with the 5.0 are you???
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 4, 2006
#35
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #35
OrLackThereof said:
The stage 2 is a hell of a mean cam but you need Trick Flow's valvesprings for it.... I run Edelbrock heads, and the springs are rated to .550 lift, so I went with a similar Lunati grind with less lift (.533/.544)

By the way guys, if youre going to compare cams, you're best off comparing duration at .050, as opposed to advertised duration. Most cam manufacturers will read advertised duration at the same location on the lobe, but this isn't always the case, so you can be mislead. Comparing them at .050 insures you're getting a true comparison every time, I pretty much completely ignore advertised duration anymore, unless they dont list it at .050.
Click to expand...


I'd be all for specs @ .050 but i don't have'em I'm by no means a cam guru, i just know a little about'em, mostly from guys locally and stuff i've played with.
 
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 4, 2006
#36
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #36
Chietala said:
You want the powerband were your going to use it... I dont think he's towing jetskies with the 5.0 are you???
Click to expand...

And he's virtually stock and wants it for the sound. So why suggest a performance cam like the B cam, when he doesn't even have mods to support it. People have gone plenty fast on the stock cam, hell I think the B might even push his powerband to the upper limit of the parts he has on it, and sacrifice useable lower-end power.

But hey, I guess I tow jet skies.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Dec 4, 2006
#37
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #37
If your just after sound invest in a trick exhaust system!
 
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 4, 2006
#38
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #38
GTOReturns said:
If your just after sound invest in a trick exhaust system!
Click to expand...

Thats what Im saying, I advise against a cam swap! The reason I suggest an E-303 is that it keeps the powerband real close to stock but adds some top-end.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Dec 4, 2006
#39
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #39
OrLackThereof said:
Thats what Im saying, I advise against a cam swap! The reason I suggest an E-303 is that it keeps the powerband real close to stock but adds some top-end.
Click to expand...

Yeah but just the addition of a Cobra intake will do the same. And its 1/2 the work!
 
O

OrLackThereof

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
560
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 4, 2006
#40
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #40
GTOReturns said:
Yeah but just the addition of a Cobra intake will do the same. And its 1/2 the work!
Click to expand...

And probably a bigger power gain! But he wanted that cam lope. As someone else said, could always idle it at 600 and disconnect a vacuum line lol
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
799
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
704
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
870
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
905
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?