• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Can I get more head room?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DC02'GT
  • Start date Start date Sep 19, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

DC02'GT

New Member
Aug 4, 2002
26
0
0
Dallas
Sep 19, 2003
#1
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #1
I know the question has been asked before, but I can not find the old post. Is there any way of lowering the factory seats in an 02'GT in order to get more head room?
 
R

Roger_4.6_96

Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
1,209
0
0
Reno,NV
Sep 19, 2003
#2
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #2
i donno

i was sitting in my friends 99 cobra and i noticed my head would hit
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Sep 19, 2003
#3
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #3
No power seats? Mine go low enough to where it looks like I'm a little kid stitting in daddy's car. I know there is a way to extend the seat rail to allow for taller drivers. Might check to see if there is one to lower the seat too.
 

Slapyo

Admin Dude
Feb 8, 2003
1,068
1
49
Anaheim, CA
Sep 19, 2003
#4
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #4
only things i found was these articles:

leg room mod

how to make your 99+ seats fully recline

not sure if either of those would actually help with head room problems.
 
D

DC02'GT

New Member
Aug 4, 2002
26
0
0
Dallas
Sep 19, 2003
#5
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #5
I have the factory leather seats & yes they are power. I have also noticed that the factory cloth seats that are manual feel as if they sit lower than the leather ones. I don't know if it is because the cushion inside of the two seats are different or if it is from all the power controls under the seat. My seats do feel as if they are alot firmer than the cloth seats. Can I put manual controls on my seats & do away with they power controls???

Thanks for the two links but I have enough leg room, I just hate my head being so close to the roof. That is the only positive thing I can say about a Camaro is that they do have plenty of head room!
 

JCKnife

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2002
602
0
0
Ohio
Sep 19, 2003
#6
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #6
More head room? That's easy!

1. Apply the parking brake
2. Put the windows down
3. Put the top down

Infinite headroom!
 

stangtrooper97

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2002
322
1
0
King of Prussia
Sep 19, 2003
#7
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #7
DC02'GT said:
I have the factory leather seats & yes they are power. I have also noticed that the factory cloth seats that are manual feel as if they sit lower than the leather ones. I don't know if it is because the cushion inside of the two seats are different or if it is from all the power controls under the seat. My seats do feel as if they are alot firmer than the cloth seats. Can I put manual controls on my seats & do away with they power controls???

Thanks for the two links but I have enough leg room, I just hate my head being so close to the roof. That is the only positive thing I can say about a Camaro is that they do have plenty of head room!
Click to expand...

Go to the junkyard and find some manual seat tracks from a V-6. It takes like 8 bolts if I'm not mistaken. You will lose the power feature but you will gain alot of headroom. I'm 6'3" but my dad is 6'6" and he sits with the seat totally upright and still has room. So unless you are taller than that, you should be just fine.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Sep 19, 2003
#8
  • Sep 19, 2003
  • #8
I may be wrong but it seems the 94-98's have a bit more room than the 99+. I guess you could recline the seat a little but then you run the risk of getting ghetto neck.
 
D

DC02'GT

New Member
Aug 4, 2002
26
0
0
Dallas
Sep 20, 2003
#9
  • Sep 20, 2003
  • #9
Thanks for the help. I guess it is time to ditch the power controls & get some manual tracks.
JCKnife- That would be too easy, & besides I do not want to add a roll cage in order to keep a vert from twisting. I'll stay with the manual seat tracks & my hard top. I'm not bashing, verts look sweet, they're just not for me. On the other hand, you are up north, a vert in Texas & you can feel as if you are being cooked alive!!!
 

Stangnut

Member
Mar 24, 2003
483
0
16
Dothan, AL
Sep 20, 2003
#10
  • Sep 20, 2003
  • #10
DC02'GT said:
Thanks for the help. I guess it is time to ditch the power controls & get some manual tracks.
JCKnife- That would be too easy, & besides I do not want to add a roll cage in order to keep a vert from twisting. I'll stay with the manual seat tracks & my hard top. I'm not bashing, verts look sweet, they're just not for me. On the other hand, you are up north, a vert in Texas & you can feel as if you are being cooked alive!!!
Click to expand...
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE let me know how this turns out.
Email me, call me, throw a brick at me w/ a note attached. I don't care!
I have been wanting to get more head room since the day I bought the car!
I really think there's a particular height that just doesn't fit well in the 99+ cars. If I were taller (I'm 5' 10") I could slide the seat back and take advantage of the higher roof line a little farther back. Or just recline the seat more, but then I couldn't reach the wheel or shifter.

BTW, how in the world do you tall guys put up with the rear view mirror? Mine's AT eye level, which SUX! Isn't it BELOW your eye level?

Jason
 
2

2002redgt

New Member
Apr 19, 2002
28
0
0
Tampa, FL
Sep 20, 2003
#11
  • Sep 20, 2003
  • #11
I have the same problem, plenty of leg room and not enough head room. Let us know how it turns out with the v6 tracks, pm me!
 

Stangnut

Member
Mar 24, 2003
483
0
16
Dothan, AL
Sep 21, 2003
#12
  • Sep 21, 2003
  • #12
Anybody else try this?

Jason
 

Toms302

Founding Member
Feb 15, 2001
243
0
0
Mountlake Terrace, WA
Sep 22, 2003
#13
  • Sep 22, 2003
  • #13
I had the same headroom issue in my 2003, and it did place the rear view mirror right in my line of sight. I had to scrunch down to see stoplights unless I stopped a fair distance from them. I'm only 6'2" but overall height isn't the problem, it's how much of your height is in your legs and how much is in your torso.

I ordered a set of manual tracks from www.stangparts.com, and when I went to install them a month later I found that the seat belt receiver had been hacked off. I didn't know that 1999 and newer have the seatbelt receiver mounted to the seat track, not the transmission tunnel. I do beleive that the manual track would have done the trick if I was sent one that hadn't been cut up.

My final solution was to get a set of Recaro LXF's with custom seat brackets from www.speedwaremotorsports.com - I am now almost too low in the car! The passenger side did not lower as much as the driver side for some reason. I now actually feel comfortable in the car - it is a huge difference!

I chose the LXF model because it does not have the holes in the top for a shoulder harness, as I don't plan on getting a harness. The LXF has a headrest that is adjustable in height and position. This was another problem I had with my stock seats - the headrest all the way up was still only high enough to snap my neck in case of an accident.

I have had a 1991, a 1998 and now a 2003 - it seems like each year the headroom gets less and less. Funny, I thought the average height of the population was slowly increasing...
 

Stangnut

Member
Mar 24, 2003
483
0
16
Dothan, AL
Sep 22, 2003
#14
  • Sep 22, 2003
  • #14
Toms302 said:
I had the same headroom issue in my 2003, and it did place the rear view mirror right in my line of sight. I had to scrunch down to see stoplights unless I stopped a fair distance from them. I'm only 6'2" but overall height isn't the problem, it's how much of your height is in your legs and how much is in your torso.

I ordered a set of manual tracks from www.stangparts.com, and when I went to install them a month later I found that the seat belt receiver had been hacked off. I didn't know that 1999 and newer have the seatbelt receiver mounted to the seat track, not the transmission tunnel. I do beleive that the manual track would have done the trick if I was sent one that hadn't been cut up.

My final solution was to get a set of Recaro LXF's with custom seat brackets from www.speedwaremotorsports.com - I am now almost too low in the car! The passenger side did not lower as much as the driver side for some reason. I now actually feel comfortable in the car - it is a huge difference!

I chose the LXF model because it does not have the holes in the top for a shoulder harness, as I don't plan on getting a harness. The LXF has a headrest that is adjustable in height and position. This was another problem I had with my stock seats - the headrest all the way up was still only high enough to snap my neck in case of an accident.

I have had a 1991, a 1998 and now a 2003 - it seems like each year the headroom gets less and less. Funny, I thought the average height of the population was slowly increasing...
Click to expand...
Thanks for the help, but, WOW... $700 per seat is a little steap for me!
That really sux too because they actually offer beige fabric.
Looks like I'll be trying the manual seat track option. Problem is, some say it lowers the seat and others say it doesn't.
How much did you pay for your hacked-up ones?

Jason
 

B C

New Member
Jun 5, 2003
444
0
0
Chino, CA
Sep 23, 2003
#15
  • Sep 23, 2003
  • #15
Kenny Brown makes seat rail extenders for taller drivers but it sounds like you need to lower your seat somehow.
 

Toms302

Founding Member
Feb 15, 2001
243
0
0
Mountlake Terrace, WA
Sep 23, 2003
#16
  • Sep 23, 2003
  • #16
I think the used rails are only about $35. Not too bad a loss if they don't work out.
 

Stangnut

Member
Mar 24, 2003
483
0
16
Dothan, AL
Sep 23, 2003
#17
  • Sep 23, 2003
  • #17
Toms302 said:
I think the used rails are only about $35. Not too bad a loss if they don't work out.
Click to expand...
That's exactly what I was thinking about doing. What the hell. Hey it's $35 compared to $800-$1000 for aftermarket seats.

In fact, today, I was just about to call some local salvage yards when a friend of mine brought up a good point. The manual passenger seat doesn't sit any lower. That would look wierd if it did. Ford isn't going to have have two different passenger tracks. One to match the height of the power driver's seat and one to match the manual driver's seat. So it would stand to reason the manual driver's track is the same height as the power and therefore the manual passenger track.

Make sense? Well it did to me at the time, but it's getting late now. I'll go measure the height of the passsenger seat from the floorboard tomorrow and see if it's close to the 4" under the driver's seat.

Jason
 

Stangnut

Member
Mar 24, 2003
483
0
16
Dothan, AL
Oct 9, 2003
#18
  • Oct 9, 2003
  • #18
Bump...again.
 
4

4.6Liter

New Member
Jan 21, 2003
146
0
0
Dallas, Texas
Oct 10, 2003
#19
  • Oct 10, 2003
  • #19
Toms302 said:
I think the used rails are only about $35. Not too bad a loss if they don't work out.
Click to expand...

These SUCK ! ! ! ! I had them in my 95 GT and they made the seat at a funny angle and also raised it up about 1" taller. DON'T GET THEM
 
4

4.6Liter

New Member
Jan 21, 2003
146
0
0
Dallas, Texas
Oct 10, 2003
#20
  • Oct 10, 2003
  • #20
Slapyo said:
only things i found was these articles:

leg room mod

This mod works great (I did it in my 95) but does not work on the 99 & up because they have a different bracket the mounts to the seat.
Click to expand...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
340
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
P
Hello, core supports for '86 vs '90-3, i need some answers if anyone knows
  • Pony Dr.Mike
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
7
Views
266
The Welcome Wagon Mar 15, 2026
95steedamustang
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
340
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
277
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
686
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?