• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Can I make a 5.0 handle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1993 2.3LX
  • Start date Start date Jun 30, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
First Prev 6 of 6

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jul 7, 2009
#101
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #101
If you have the coin to get a trickflow kit and rebuild a bottom end....how about rebuilding the bottom end of a 351 and tossing a HCI on that? More cubes!!!! Similar price and it drops right in.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Jul 8, 2009
#102
  • Jul 8, 2009
  • #102
95Vert383AOD said:
If you have the coin to get a trickflow kit and rebuild a bottom end....how about rebuilding the bottom end of a 351 and tossing a HCI on that? More cubes!!!! Similar price and it drops right in.
Click to expand...

also extra weight, if i were the OP i would do as much as i could to keep the weight down, even if it means sacrificing the extra power
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jul 8, 2009
#103
  • Jul 8, 2009
  • #103
Shaolin Crane said:
also extra weight, if i were the OP i would do as much as i could to keep the weight down, even if it means sacrificing the extra power
Click to expand...

My 351 based build ended up being alot lighter than the stock motor. A 351 with aluminum heads weighs the same if not less than the factory motor with iron heads. Realistically you're talking about an extra 50 pounds in the block. You wont even notice it there with all the extra HP and torque you'll be making.

After removing smog and a/c and dropping in my 351 based 383 my front end actually sat an inch higher than it did with the old motor in.

Like i said you'll notice the extra power before you notice any extra weight. An extra 50 lbs so you can make a 408+ ci naturally aspired motor that puts out 500hp pump gas is worth the 50 lbs. What are the n/a 347 guys making?? just under 400??? and they have a weaker block they have to worry about possibly splitting. for 50 lbs you get strength and a larger motor with more power.

And BTW thermostats are much easier to change on the 351 since the right bolt isn't behind the water pump. The 351 is easier to work on period because things aren't so crammed.

Sorry about the derail and i dont want to turn this into a 302 vs. 351 thread. But theres alot of 347 guys that deep down inside wished they had gotten a 351. Stroker kits cost the same for 351 and 302...and a Machine shop rebuilding the motor charges by the cylinder not by the engines displacement.

Make your next move your best move
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Jul 8, 2009
#104
  • Jul 8, 2009
  • #104
well that just goes back and forth, how much weight will you save if you did all the mentioned to a 302, and i have seen N/A 347's make close to 500hp, sure he'll notice the extra power first but he's def gonna notice the extra weight on the front end in the turns, an aluminun headed 302 striped bare and an aluminum headed 351 stripped the 302 is always gonna weigh less
 

1993 2.3LX

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
16
0
0
North Florida
Jul 8, 2009
#105
  • Jul 8, 2009
  • #105
I would rather give up some power to keep weight off the front end of the car. If it were a front-mid engine car I might not mind a little extra weight. I would like to see some hard core numbers on the different engine mods. Another thing to think about (and it may not matter) is that I want to stay with FI. I do not want to have to switch to a carb.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jul 8, 2009
#106
  • Jul 8, 2009
  • #106
if you were smart you would scrounge up some cash and buy this car, it will save you about 10k and has a good chunk of the MM catalog on it already

metallic blue 89 Notchback all MM suspension NEED TO SELL ASAP! - Corral Forums
 

1993 2.3LX

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
16
0
0
North Florida
Jul 8, 2009
#107
  • Jul 8, 2009
  • #107
90lxcoupe said:
if you were smart you would scrounge up some cash and buy this car, it will save you about 10k and has a good chunk of the MM catalog on it already

metallic blue 89 Notchback all MM suspension NEED TO SELL ASAP! - Corral Forums
Click to expand...

If I had the money and had already bought my wife a house that would be an excellent deal. I wish I could do it.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Jul 8, 2009
#108
  • Jul 8, 2009
  • #108
90lxcoupe said:
if you were smart you would scrounge up some cash and buy this car, it will save you about 10k and has a good chunk of the MM catalog on it already

metallic blue 89 Notchback all MM suspension NEED TO SELL ASAP! - Corral Forums
Click to expand...

damn i woulda bought that car
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
First Prev 6 of 6
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
162
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
884
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
712
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?