• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

can I use a fox body rear in my 96 gt

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockyracoon
  • Start date Start date Nov 21, 2010
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Nov 21, 2010
#1
  • Nov 21, 2010
  • #1
can I use a fox body rear in my 96 gt ? are the housing dimensions the same?
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Nov 21, 2010
#2
  • Nov 21, 2010
  • #2
suspension pick-up points are identical. the housing itself is narrower and hte axle shafts are shorter. using a fox body rear end in a SN95 or New edge lets you run wider tyres generally.
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Nov 21, 2010
#3
  • Nov 21, 2010
  • #3
could I use my sn 95 axles ? will the backing plates bolt right up ?

I guess im just trying to figure out how much trouble it would be.
there seems to be tons of fox body rears available in my location
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Nov 21, 2010
#4
  • Nov 21, 2010
  • #4
You should be able to stick the SN-95 axles in the Fox housing, however Foxes don't have the provisions for ABS, if I'm not mistaken.
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 22, 2010
#5
  • Nov 22, 2010
  • #5
If you put your axles in a fox body rear end, you would be gaining nothing. Your wheels will still be in the same spot they are now. You would actually be putting more stress on the snout of your axles because the hub will stick out farther from the axle tube than it does with a 94-98 housing. I'm really not even sure if it would work, because your caliper is going to bolt on to your backing plate, and the rotor will be pushed out about .5" from where it needs to be because the axles in a sn95 are longer than a fox body.
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Nov 22, 2010
#6
  • Nov 22, 2010
  • #6
Are you positive,because I was under the impression that the axle housing dimensions were identical from 1987 to 1998 but the sn 95 axler are just longer to accommodate the abs ring
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 22, 2010
#7
  • Nov 22, 2010
  • #7
rockyracoon said:
Are you positive,because I was under the impression that the axle housing dimensions were identical from 1987 to 1998 but the sn 95 axler are just longer to accommodate the abs ring
Click to expand...

I am 100% positive. I will look and find the measurements from flange to flange. I can't remember where I wrote them down at. But from hub to hub, they are 87-93-57", 94-98-58.5", 99-04-59 7/8th. I will look and see if I can find the flange to flange
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 22, 2010
#8
  • Nov 22, 2010
  • #8
Well now you have my curiosity running and I have done a lot of looking around on the interweb. It seems like you may be right on this.
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Nov 22, 2010
#9
  • Nov 22, 2010
  • #9
Well if they are the same dimensions, would the bolt pattern for the backing plates be the same?
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 23, 2010
#10
  • Nov 23, 2010
  • #10
Yep you are right, I applogize.

Yes the backing plate will work.
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Nov 25, 2010
#11
  • Nov 25, 2010
  • #11
Well its pretty much a moot point now as I ended up getting one out of a 94 gt that is stock with 327s . $150.00 and was from a car with about 50 k on clock,so I'm pretty happy.thanks for the replys
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Nov 25, 2010
#12
  • Nov 25, 2010
  • #12
Or is it replies?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Nov 26, 2010
#13
  • Nov 26, 2010
  • #13
The axles housing is the same from 86-98. Put yur brakes in an 86-93 drum brake axle and you have basically a 94-98 axles.

Only difference is the brake line routing...but that can be changed
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Nov 27, 2010
#14
  • Nov 27, 2010
  • #14
Yeah the brake line routing was also different on the 94 as well.

My 96 has the routing under the body,but the routing on the 94 is on the axle its self.

I just kept the lines under the body,and removed the lines from on top of the new rear.didnt have to bleed the brakes doing it that way, since nothing was ever opened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
2nd Fox Body
  • N8827N
  • Jul 17, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
99
The Welcome Wagon Jul 18, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
M
Progress Thread 96 GT Convertible when defrost turned on wants to kill it ..
  • mike7880
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
140
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 26, 2026
mike7880
M
A
90 Fox 4Lug rear convert to 5 Lug
  • adimice
  • Jun 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
155
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
limp
New gal in San Diego
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
197
The Welcome Wagon Feb 11, 2026
Mcmahst
M
Iac valve
  • Mike3
  • Aug 8, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
232
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?