• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Can someone explain the whole higher octane gas is not better thing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Jul 22, 2006

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Jul 22, 2006
#1
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #1
I know someone said this wasn't true but I don't remember the reasoning behind it. I know that when I switched back down to regular from 93, my car felt "better". And I know it wasn't just my head.
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Jul 22, 2006
#2
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #2
Octane # is essentially a resistance to igniting. So a higher octane is harder to ignite than a lower octane #. High compression engines use higher octane because if they didn't, the fuel would ignite on the compression stroke before the spark plug created a spark and the engine would knock.

If you run high octane in an engine that doesn't need it as knock prevention, then you would suffer lower power from the fuel being harder to ignite.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Jul 22, 2006
#3
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #3
thanks matt, now I have to explain that to my parents since they're running 93 oct on their 05 grand am and 02 sport trac.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Jul 22, 2006
#4
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #4
Some places put additives the higher octane gas to help keep the engine cleaner. Other than that, if their cars are not pinging then there's no reasone to run higher octane in those cars.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Jul 22, 2006
#5
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #5
So when would it be appropriate to run a higher octane?
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Jul 22, 2006
#6
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #6
On a stock car, the owner's manual will tell you which octane is recommended.

When you start modifying the car, like higher compression and or a more aggressive timing curve, you then need to run a higher octane to prevent detonation.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Jul 22, 2006
#7
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #7
illwood said:
On a stock car, the owner's manual will tell you which octane is recommended.

When you start modifying the car, like higher compression and or a more aggressive timing curve, you then need to run a higher octane to prevent detonation.
Click to expand...
:Word:
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 22, 2006
#8
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #8
Right on. Higher octane doesn't mean your car will be faster with it lol. Higher octane just means it is less "explosive." Right gas for the right car.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Jul 22, 2006
#9
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #9
My parents don't think they'll go faster but they think that it's cleaner and will help them get better gas mileage.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 22, 2006
#10
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #10
Interesting. The whole cleaner thing was shot down years ago by congress. One of the gas companies were claiming that there gas was cleaner by directing your attention to a clear glass window in the handle of the pump - Amaco I think. That advertising was banned because they rules out the possibility of one gas being cleaner than another as false advertising. If you want your car to run cleaner, put some additive in it from Pep boys to clean the injectors. You would think that if the 93 is less combustable then the car won't run as well with 93 if it is supossed to have 87. Wouldn't that result is lower efficiency and worse gas mileage? Any chemical engineers want to comment?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jul 22, 2006
#11
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #11
Some folks do notice slightly higher milage with higher octane. I also wonder if a bit has to do with the additives that Mike mentioned.

Nacho, if you're not pinging now (on lower grade fuel) and you didnt change timing, you very likely DID improve performance.

To answer your question another way, another time to up the octane is when one sees pinging and cant back timing down anymore. At that point, higher octane can be appropriate.

Your parents cars' likely have knock sensors, which kinda adjusts for fuel grade anyhow (to an extent).

Good luck.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Jul 22, 2006
#12
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #12
Thanks guys. I just wanted to have an explanation to give them when they ask me WHY?
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Jul 22, 2006
#13
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #13
so if you bump the timing up, to say 14*, which octane should you run?
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jul 22, 2006
#14
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #14
Punisher302 said:
so if you bump the timing up, to say 14*, which octane should you run?
Click to expand...

87. if it pings, back the timing down. Running higher octane just to have a more agressive timing curve is like putting a humidifier and a de-humidifier in the same room and letting them battle it out. Very counter-productive.
 
9

95five-oh

New Member
Jun 25, 2006
158
0
0
Mount Airy, MD
Jul 22, 2006
#15
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #15
not trying to steal the thread, but my car is bone stock with 150k on the odometer and the timing has not been fooled with to my knowledge, but if i run anything but 93 octane, it pings and knocks like a diesel...anyone know what would cause this?
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Jul 22, 2006
#16
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #16
95five-oh said:
not trying to steal the thread, but my car is bone stock with 150k on the odometer and the timing has not been fooled with to my knowledge, but if i run anything but 93 octane, it pings and knocks like a diesel...anyone know what would cause this?
Click to expand...
1st thing to do would be to check the timing and repost results...and go from there..
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jul 22, 2006
#17
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #17
95five-oh said:
not trying to steal the thread, but my car is bone stock with 150k on the odometer and the timing has not been fooled with to my knowledge, but if i run anything but 93 octane, it pings and knocks like a diesel...anyone know what would cause this?
Click to expand...

Yup, as bill said, check your base timing with the spout out. It could have been bumped. Also check your balancer for rubber degredation as this will make your timing light useless.

But a search on this forum for "pinging" will bring a multitude of solutions and the implimentations of these fixes, first and foremost being cleaning the MAF/IAT and checking the ECT's proper operation.
Scott
 

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Jul 22, 2006
#18
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #18
Also usually a lower octane fuel is a faster burning fuel, know as fast burn. Race gas has a lower burn rate, however some race gas is formulated to be a faster burn than others. So if that is confusing than just remember that pump gas usually has a faster burn rate than av gas or race fuels.
 

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Jul 22, 2006
#19
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #19
One more note, usually this is why it is very important when selecting fuels or building an engine, you must build the engine around what fuel you will be using to make the most power. This isn't neccessarily as important for street cars running on pump gas as it is for purpose built race engines.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jul 23, 2006
#20
  • Jul 23, 2006
  • #20
mo_dingo said:
87. if it pings, back the timing down. Running higher octane just to have a more agressive timing curve is like putting a humidifier and a de-humidifier in the same room and letting them battle it out. Very counter-productive.
Click to expand...


So are u saying that you wont see any improvement when bumping the timing and running 93 to eliminate chances of pinging?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
837
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
918
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
841
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
M
Could this part be identified?
  • MartinM
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
298
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 8, 2025
Shakerhood
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?