• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Can we completely get rid of body roll?

  • Thread starter Thread starter igotyofire
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2005
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Dec 16, 2005
#1
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #1
My car is lowered and has adjustable shocks im quite amazed at its performance but i did come from blown shocks. Im just curious if its possible to get rid of the body roll completely. I still have some but not as much as before. Just wondering if any other suspension mods help out?
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Dec 16, 2005
#2
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #2
You could make it insanely stiff, but it would do more bad than good. You need the body roll for the suspension to work the way it was designed.
 
B

blk9450

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,507
0
0
your moms bed
Dec 16, 2005
#3
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #3
think about it, if you had no body roll, your left and right side would have to compress the same amount , always, like a 1 link suspension. that would make handling worse. think weight transfer, as in a launch. you would have no weight transfer to cut a corner, i think you would just slide. you could always weld your shocks so they dont move...
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Dec 16, 2005
#4
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #4
Full lenght subs will do the trick..You'll be amazed at the difference...
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Dec 16, 2005
#5
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #5
don't weld your shocks, seriously though weight transfer is not desireable on side to side movement as the modified macpherson setup we are cursed with has little camber gain upon compression.

if you are transferring the weight on to one tire that tire will exceed it's friction ability and slide--the mustang understeer. limiting roll will decrease this effect and as an added bonus you will feel much more in control of the vehicle.

you can and should buy a beefy front sway bar and a cobra rear sway bar. if your wallet can take it a panhard bar is very nice as is a set of 18" wheels with some 35 series tires, and caster plates are crucial.

http://www.v8power.com/item--Kenny-Brown-Front-Sway-Bar-Med-Firm-94-04-Mustang-Cobra--KBP80503.html
that is my front sway bar, and i must say that it is amazing. i have eibach pro kits, that sway bar, good struts, cc plates, panhard bar, 18" wheels with 35 series rubber and my body roll is extremely minimal. i compare my car(handling wise) to a 95-99 M3.

what EXACTLY are your suspension mods?
 
B

blk9450

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,507
0
0
your moms bed
Dec 16, 2005
#6
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #6
bimmertech said:
don't weld your shocks, seriously though weight transfer is not desireable on side to side movement as the modified macpherson setup we are cursed with has little camber gain upon compression.

if you are transferring the weight on to one tire that tire will exceed it's friction ability and slide--the mustang understeer. limiting roll will decrease this effect and as an added bonus you will feel much more in control of the vehicle.
Click to expand...

ok im wrong, i rethought it and i guess youre right, so solid suspension would be the best handling wise for track ala cart racing.
so with an independent rear, that would gain camber in compression, so a heavier swaybar would only be feasable to a limit and tuning the tension would be necessary for optimal performance? im asking cause i have no idea about suspension..
 

V8SHME8

Member
Apr 24, 2004
120
0
16
Gainesville, Fl
Dec 16, 2005
#7
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #7
There is a point of diminishing returns since the larger the swaybar, the greater the reduction in suspension independence. Most guys that run in AI just have really high spring rates. These rates might be higher than most would run on a street car which is why there is a market for the larger swaybars. You can try offset some of that lost camber on turn in by adding more caster.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Dec 16, 2005
#8
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #8
blk9450 said:
ok im wrong, i rethought it and i guess youre right, so solid suspension would be the best handling wise for track ala cart racing.
so with an independent rear, that would gain camber in compression, so a heavier swaybar would only be feasable to a limit and tuning the tension would be necessary for optimal performance? im asking cause i have no idea about suspension..
Click to expand...
i'm not really following you here. as far as cart goes they use inboard mounted coilovers and run a short/long arm(sla) suspension. sla suspension gives the most camber gain on compression, think the upper arm shorter pulls the spindle inwards at the top creating camber. this is ideal for street cars as you can run a very mild initial camber setting to reduce tire wear.

as far as running a real big sway bar, it all depends on what you are doing. we all know that running a stiffer spring resists suspension compression thus limiting body roll. said stiff spring is not really disireable to run on a dd as comfort will be diminished. i prefer to run a softer spring and use a bigger sway bar. this will limit body roll and still maintain an acceptable ride. example would be a BMW 745li. they are equipped with a pair of hydraulically controlled sway bars that work with a ton of sensors to limit body roll. these vehicles come with relatively soft springs for plush ride, but put that big ol cruiser in a corner and you would swear you are driving a race car.
 

DarkProphet

Founding Member
Aug 19, 2002
391
0
0
Quakertown, PA
Dec 17, 2005
#9
  • Dec 17, 2005
  • #9
Stiff suspension works for cart cars also because of their insane amout of downforce from the wings, and the fact that they use really soft tires. The fact that your mustang has no downforce and street tires would make your car a drift car, without even trying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
For Sale 03 Redfire Cobra Convertible
  • FastFox5oh
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
85
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jul 14, 2026
FastFox5oh
F
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
221
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
435
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
203
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?