• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Can you run 12.5:1 compression on pump gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agent007kimball
  • Start date Start date Jun 6, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
A

agent007kimball

New Member
Jan 18, 2004
90
0
0
East Windsor, NJ
Jun 6, 2004
#1
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #1
I am looking at a 331 for sale and it will make about 12.5:1 compression. I am EFI and want to be able to run this motor on pump gas so will it be possible or will I run into some issues?
 
T

twidge

Founding Member
Aug 20, 2001
1,364
0
0
Jun 6, 2004
#2
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #2
If you don't go WOT it'll run. If you want to drive it hard I can see that being a problem.
 
A

agent007kimball

New Member
Jan 18, 2004
90
0
0
East Windsor, NJ
Jun 6, 2004
#3
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #3
So it wont run well on pump gas?...say 94 octane....will it just start knocking?...can it be tuned to run well on pump gas or is it not worth it?
 
A

agent007kimball

New Member
Jan 18, 2004
90
0
0
East Windsor, NJ
Jun 6, 2004
#4
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #4
Actually it looks like its more like 12.1 - 12.3 compression....will that make it any more feasible?
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Jun 7, 2004
#5
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #5
agent007kimball said:
Actually it looks like its more like 12.1 - 12.3 compression....will that make it any more feasible?
Click to expand...


That's still pretty high for your application. There are cars that go to 13:1 stock (eg the Prius) but the computer can also compensate for detonation and retard timing. IMHO if it is a weekend only/ drag car go for it. If it is more of a daily driver I'd say go with around 10.5:1. I went with 11.5:1 on my weekend car and always have to mix fuel.


Mike
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Jun 7, 2004
#6
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #6
run some 116 and youll be fine...or get the chambers on the heads machined to lower the comperssion ratio
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Jun 7, 2004
#7
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #7
Yeah I wouldn't want over 11:1 with 94... I have seen some guys try higher compression and the cars won't even start on pump gas.....
 
5

5.0guy

Member
Apr 17, 2004
320
0
17
MI
Jun 7, 2004
#8
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #8
do they sell 104 octane at pumps near u?(prolly wouldn't mix it, just run that straight. I know they have 104 unleaded) that should suffice. maybe 110.
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Jun 7, 2004
#9
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #9
5.0guy said:
do they sell 104 octane at pumps near u?(prolly wouldn't mix it, just run that straight. I know they have 104 unleaded) that should suffice. maybe 110.
Click to expand...


Is it realy worth the 4 to 6 bucksa gallon for a point and half compression? Somehting to think about.. How often will you be driving it..?
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Jun 7, 2004
#10
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #10
perkys stang said:
Yeah I wouldn't want over 11:1 with 94... I have seen some guys try higher compression and the cars won't even start on pump gas.....
Click to expand...

My 418 is 11.25:1, runs good so far on 93 pump gas, 29* total timing.
mike.
 

wildstanggt

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
186
0
0
Omaha, NE
Jun 7, 2004
#11
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #11
I have been wondering a similiar question. It sounds like 11:1 is the max for pump gas. I am looking at buying a CHP dynotec longlock 347 with 11:1 compression that makes 500 flywheel horsepower and 460 lb of torque. Can I run this on 93 octane? should I mix with 116 race gas? or should I just buy some 104 octane booster and drop that in everytime I fill up?
thanks
 

wildstanggt

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
186
0
0
Omaha, NE
Jun 7, 2004
#12
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #12
could you run a 125 shot of nitrous on top of the 11:1 compression motor? would you need race gas for sure then?
 

ninjacoupe

New Member
Jul 6, 2003
174
0
0
NY
Jun 7, 2004
#13
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #13
Had 11:1 on pump gas with no issues if built for it. Cam and chamber have alot to do with it. 12:1 is really pushing it. Reverse cooling (cooling the heads then the block) would probably let you get away with it but would require more work than its worth.
 
S

stangin it

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
554
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jun 7, 2004
#14
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #14
12:5:1 will be too much for pump gas if your going to have a some what aggressive tune and drive it daily. Personally i wouldnt spray on an 11:1 motor without a little 104 octane just to keep things safe. Just my opinion im sure people here have done both.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jun 7, 2004
#15
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #15
No way. Not unless the pump you go to says "trick" on it. You can get away with 11:1 with a big block but not a small block. 10:5 is really pushing it, in the summer especially. Any time the motor sees any combination of heat and load it will detonate.
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Jun 8, 2004
#16
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #16
5.0 HOtrain said:
My 418 is 11.25:1, runs good so far on 93 pump gas, 29* total timing.
mike.
Click to expand...

A little over the 11:1 and you can do it with less timing but then you are defeating the purpose of the compression.. Ie less timing less power.. I just think I would rather have 11:1 and run 36 deg.. and let it scream.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 8, 2004
#17
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #17
perkys stang said:
A little over the 11:1 and you can do it with less timing but then you are defeating the purpose of the compression.. Ie less timing less power.. I just think I would rather have 11:1 and run 36 deg.. and let it scream.
Click to expand...

Bill is right 100%, and machining the chambers to lower the compression isn't always the best thing for flame travel, quench, etc...

Since you have O2's you would need high octane unleaded gas which is $4-$6/gal
 
B

BillaMustang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2002
491
0
0
Jun 8, 2004
#18
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #18
12.5 is just too much. the cam and head type have a big effect on it. it can be done but a lot of precision measuring and machining must be performed.
i would not go over 11.0. even then it requires a lot of precision machining and measuring.
when going to high compression the quench ht. becomes very important.
 

beaver2489

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
503
2
0
st. joseph missouri
Jun 8, 2004
#19
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #19
my daily driver has 10.7:1 on 91 or 92 octane @14* timing. no problems. So, I'd say 11:1 would be as high as I'd go on pump gas
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Jun 8, 2004
#20
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #20
perkys stang said:
A little over the 11:1 and you can do it with less timing but then you are defeating the purpose of the compression.. Ie less timing less power..
Click to expand...

Well, it did only make 581

Going to check you're site Bill, instead of asking how the car is.
mike.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
284
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
305
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
Suspension Quad shocks
  • keel
  • May 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
400
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2026
Mustang5L5
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
775
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
289
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?