• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Can't wait any longer. Gotta spill the beans

  • Thread starter Thread starter 10secgoal
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 10, 2006
#1
  • Jun 10, 2006
  • #1
I'm at the block limits, and plan to go over them pretty soon. Been thinking a long time about a mod motor in my 67. Well I have an offer on the table I can't refuse. A 40k mile longblock from a lightning. I'm about 90% sure I'll go this route. After looking at dart shortblocks and the price of mod motors and all the junk needed to fit them, I kinda let the idea go until this offer. the guy tells me it's exclty the same dimensionally as a 4.6, it's just stroked. I haven't kept up on anything modular over the past few years. I just need some pics of to room up front to know if I can turbo this thing or not. If I can fit one, it's a go for sure. They love boost, that's for sure. So after the cost of a new short block, i figure I can actually do this much cheaper, and just plain be different. Yes, it will be carbed.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Jun 11, 2006
#2
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #2
Lame. Mud motors are terrible.

Never seen a turbo in a classic but a guy around here (Gene Wilson) runs a 5.4 navigator motor in a fox. Very nice install and apparently makes ~600 rwhp on 93.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Jun 11, 2006
#3
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #3
Mod motors do love boost. The issue here is that the lightning 5.4 is not the same motor as the 4.6 but just stroked. It is taller then a 4.6. however, you can put a 5.4 on 4.6 motor mounts, like a 351 can mount on 302 mounts..Also, the internals of a lightning are not bullet proof. If you are going to turbo it, and make some serious boost, you will need to forge that set up.
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Jun 11, 2006
#4
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #4
I'm pretty sure a 5.4 is taller and wider than a 4.6, kinda like a 351w and a 302.

I remember a mustang mag putting a 5.4 in a 99+ stang, and having to make spacers to take up the space between the stock 4.6 intake and the heads of the 5.4 because the 5.4 was wider, which would also mean it was taller, since they are both 90 degree V8s.

I'm not an expert by any means, but I would definitely check into it for sure with a ford dealer or something.
 

LUCAFU1

Founding Member
Apr 19, 2001
496
0
16
Tucson
Jun 11, 2006
#5
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #5
yeah lightning motors are weak and will spit a rod out faster then a stock gt 4.6 will (maybe at the same time). fiting a turbo will be tight but anything can be done with time and money. if you build the shortblock up then you will be set and have a monster on your hands.
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Jun 11, 2006
#6
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #6
Do you have the mustang II front end? The 4.6 is wider than a 460... and the 5.4 is wider than that.
 

BIG-MAC

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
82
0
0
Dallas
Jun 11, 2006
#7
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #7
You are in for much, much more that just an engine swap. Your shock towers have to go which means the entire front suspension needs to be replaced with a MII style like Dark Knight mentioned. I think once you consider the cost (especially so if you pay someone else to do the work) of this you would be better off building a windsor based blower motor.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 11, 2006
#8
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #8
10secgoal....

What year lightning motor? If 02 and down, they have a real problem with spitting spark plugs. You have to torque them down nearly everymonth.

The rods are also the weakest link. Id say you could safely go to the 450 mark on one of them.

I will give you a call this week now that things have settled down here. I have some plans drawn up for an intake/intercooler system for a lightning...they might be able to help you out.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Jun 11, 2006
#9
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #9
I say just build and forge a 302 or 351 based motor. You will be able to make the same/if not more power, and not need to modify the front suspension/engine bay. The cost of modding the front suspension and shock towers takes away all the savings you would get from getting a great deal on a used 5.4 lightning motor.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jun 11, 2006
#10
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #10
most of my freinds build mods and the cost is WAAAAYYYYYYY more then a pushrod, not to mention all the chassis mods you'll need. Another thing i noticed is not everybody can build a mod motor that will last, from what i have seen/heard its not as easy as putting a pushrod together.

good luck
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Jun 11, 2006
#11
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #11
allcarfan said:
10secgoal....

What year lightning motor? If 02 and down, they have a real problem with spitting spark plugs. You have to torque them down nearly everymonth.
Click to expand...
No, you don't. Torque 'em once to exactly 13 ft-lbs and hope for the best. Just don't under-torque them or they'll back out; don't overtorque them or you're likely to strip the few threads the spark plug holes have.
So far (74k on the odo), I'm not one of the approx 0.01% (yeah, 1 out of every 10,000) that's had a plug spit out.

The rods are also the weakest link. I'd say you could safely go to the 450 mark on one of them.
Click to expand...
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember hearing that Lightning motors along with the Ford GT supercar motors were the only 5.4's without the powdered iron rods. You might check this one, though.
If I'm wrong, I'd be a little "spooky" about going much beyond 350-400 horse. But, then again, my '02 F150 4x4 is destined to haul things, not @$$!

Except for the "bling" factor, I can't imagine why anybody would want to go through all the work/money to stuff a 5.4 in a vintage Stang; when you could put a nice built Windsor (like on a World "Man o' War" block) would do better for the same or less total cost.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 11, 2006
#12
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #12
I think you guys are thinking of stock 5.4's. These are 8.5-1 fordged bottom ends. the guy I'm getting this motor from just ran high tens in a 5500 truck and drove it home. I wouldn't waste my time if it were the junk rods in a 4.6 (GT). I know it's not a straight swap. I'm not looking for the bling nearly as much as just a cheaper alternative to a aftermarket block. The heads are expensive for these, but everything but headgaskets and head studs are going to be stock. I want the technology(even though it's with a carb), and the strength. Probably get the block and everything later this week.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 11, 2006
#13
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • #13
dang it....
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Jun 12, 2006
#14
  • Jun 12, 2006
  • #14
10secgoal said:
I think you guys are thinking of stock 5.4's. These are 8.5-1 fordged bottom ends.
Click to expand...
Okay, so I was right about the lightning rods.
the guy I'm getting this motor from just ran high tens in a 5500 truck and drove it home.
Click to expand...
Wow! My Lariat weighs just that much and it's a 4x4 S'Cab!
I wouldn't waste my time if it were the junk rods in a 4.6 (GT). I know it's not a straight swap. I'm not looking for the bling nearly as much as just a cheaper alternative to a aftermarket block.
Click to expand...
But you're going to eat up those cost savings with the MII kit.
The heads are expensive for these, but everything but headgaskets and head studs are going to be stock. I want the technology(even though it's with a carb), and the strength.
Click to expand...
Well the Lightning used the same heads as the common 5.4's pre-'02; so you're still gonna have the "six sparkplug thread heads". That "just ain't all that strong". I know it sucks, I'm trying to build something with enough torque to haul around a 3-horse + tackroom trailer; and it still sucks. Whatever made Ford's collective knowledge base think this cammer motor was an effective replacement for the Windsor????
 

LUCAFU1

Founding Member
Apr 19, 2001
496
0
16
Tucson
Jun 12, 2006
#15
  • Jun 12, 2006
  • #15
stock L's bottom ends are junk, dont let anyone tell you different. my buddies spit a few rods out after adding a pulley and a port. THEY ARE NOT LIKE THE 03-04 COBRAS. now if you ment that your friends 5.4 is built then GO FOR IT. the IFS kit is cool and its not hard to do. I cut my strut towers out yesterday and now i just have to grind =)
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Jun 12, 2006
#16
  • Jun 12, 2006
  • #16
After looking at the cost of aftermarket blocks, I pondered several options. In the end, I have gone with a '69 351W block from a builder I trust. I just can't see the weight and cost of doing a mod motor CORRECTLY...but heh, it's your car!
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Jun 12, 2006
#17
  • Jun 12, 2006
  • #17
If I recall correctly the "Mustang in Black" -- built by DVS Restorations http://www.dvsrestorations.com/mib.html and featured in Mustang & Fords -- proceeded at first by trimming the shock towers and retaining the OE control arms. That mod was sufficient to fit a 4.6 into a '68. They switched to a Fox strut conversion for reasons I don't recall. I don't know if shock tower trimming would be enough to fit a 5.4, but I would call DVS and ask. If it's not, then DVS would be able to put you on track to do the Fox conversion, which has got to be cheaper than the Rod & Custom or Heidt's M II kits.

I agree with the others, though, that the cammer is not nearly worth the trouble. A turbo 385 series of 514 cubic inches would be tons cheaper and make tons more power.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 12, 2006
#18
  • Jun 12, 2006
  • #18
I'm not doing it if it's going to require a MII front end. That will defeat the purpose here. I did talk to DVS toady and he thinks it's possible because it is taller. Although wider. It being taller, puts the head at the higher part of the shock tower, with possibly less to trim.
180 out..it might make more, but I don't want to buy a motor for big bucks, then spend the money to go fast. If I can get a stock lightning motor to fit, then I'll leave her stock and run the piss out of it.
 
B

blk 02

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
57
0
0
Shreveport, La
Jun 13, 2006
#19
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • #19
10sec... I dont think you will have alot of problems as far as the sides will be concerned however the problem you'll have is hood clearance. A couple of people droped a lightning motor in a 99+ GT and they ended up needing a 6" cowl hood. the lightning motor is tall. you could get away with a smaller cowl if you swap the lightning blower for a cobra one. But I say go for it... But I'm a pro-mod motor guy though...

Graham
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jun 13, 2006
#20
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • #20
blk 02 said:
10sec... I dont think you will have alot of problems as far as the sides will be concerned however the problem you'll have is hood clearance. A couple of people droped a lightning motor in a 99+ GT and they ended up needing a 6" cowl hood. the lightning motor is tall. you could get away with a smaller cowl if you swap the lightning blower for a cobra one. But I say go for it... But I'm a pro-mod motor guy though...

Graham
Click to expand...

Something tells me he isn't going to need a blower
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
737
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
136
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
809
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
915
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?