Car Dynoed! #'s inside!

IndyBlk5.0

New Member

Nov 24, 2003

1,122

1

0

New Whiteland, IN

Oct 22, 2004

#1

• Oct 22, 2004

• #1

Well, first of all, I must say I am pleased with the numbers because of the factors my motor has. The low compression didn't help, and other obvious things didnt help either... The cookie contest was really close! (in talk section)

 

25thmustang

Mustang Master

Sep 5, 2003

2,021

85

99

Montgomery, NY

Oct 22, 2004

#2

• Oct 22, 2004

• #2

I believe I guess 280/315??? Do I get a cookie...

Definately nice numbers, should stick you mid to low 12s with good traction!

 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member

Nov 24, 2003

1,122

1

0

New Whiteland, IN

Oct 22, 2004

#3

• Oct 22, 2004

• #3

I think blownstanggt won the cookie with 286 hp/311 tq
Its contraversal...
However, Grover was right on the button with the torque guess... 283/314

 

88stangmangt

Active Member

Nov 25, 2003

2,332

1

48

Stafford,VA

Oct 22, 2004

#4

• Oct 22, 2004

• #4

wooooooooooooo lol with that compression you need a blower man!!!!! you could run prob 12psi and that motor would love it.......

 

88stangmangt

Active Member

Nov 25, 2003

2,332

1

48

Stafford,VA

Oct 22, 2004

#5

• Oct 22, 2004

• #5

stangnet doesnt like me anymore.....second time posting this.......nice #'s did you prep that motor for a blower? with those compression #'s you could breath a 12psi shot and that motor would love it.....VORTECH IS GOD...

 

88stangmangt

Active Member

Nov 25, 2003

2,332

1

48

Stafford,VA

Oct 22, 2004

#6

• Oct 22, 2004

• #6

:damnit: figures

 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member

Nov 24, 2003

1,122

1

0

New Whiteland, IN

Oct 22, 2004

#7

• Oct 22, 2004

• #7

lol, it is specifically built for a blower stangmangt... I thought it would be funny getting n/a dyno numbers....

 

25thmustang

Mustang Master

Sep 5, 2003

2,021

85

99

Montgomery, NY

Oct 22, 2004

#8

• Oct 22, 2004

• #8

They all cheated and guessed after me, I threw the first guess out there, and they used me to make closer more accurate guesses... LOL! Nice numbers though!

 

tmoss

Gettin Wired

Founding Member

Jun 28, 2001

7,153

32

128

Saint Louis, MO

Oct 22, 2004

#9

• Oct 22, 2004

• #9

Congrats, those are nice numbers for a low comp motor. Prob some left in the tune too. What fuel pressure and timing did you run?

 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member

Nov 24, 2003

1,122

1

0

New Whiteland, IN

Oct 22, 2004

#10

• Oct 22, 2004

• #10

14* and i will check the fp later... He said I tuned it myself almost dead on before he even got it. This is with no chip or anything of course.

 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master

Nov 29, 1999

9,692

95

99

PA

Oct 22, 2004

#11

• Oct 22, 2004

• #11

Told ya you would be happy

 

tmoss

Gettin Wired

Founding Member

Jun 28, 2001

7,153

32

128

Saint Louis, MO

Oct 22, 2004

#12

• Oct 22, 2004

• #12

You could try a couple more degrees of timing and maybe get a couple more HP.

 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member

Nov 24, 2003

1,122

1

0

New Whiteland, IN

Oct 22, 2004

#13

• Oct 22, 2004

• #13

Driveability is great right now, drives like a stocker, until you get on it =) I don't want to sacrifice that.

 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??

Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here

May 15, 2002

1,785

1,130

233

Indiana

Oct 22, 2004

#14

• Oct 22, 2004

• #14

very nice. I am proud of you seeing how you put it back in and finished it all by your self! Great work Jason!!

 

TT91

Active Member

May 23, 2003

1,536

0

36

Paramus, NJ

Oct 23, 2004

#15

• Oct 23, 2004

• #15

IndyBlk5.0 said:

lol, it is specifically built for a blower stangmangt... I thought it would be funny getting n/a dyno numbers....

Click to expand...

Drop the word "blower" and replace it with boost..or forced induction.

Nice numbers, im selling my s-trim to some guy in a few hours now..

 

FrdMustangCpe

New Member

May 27, 2004

493

0

0

Sin City, NV

Oct 23, 2004

#16

• Oct 23, 2004

• #16

boost boost boost

 

04sleeper

Founding Member

Jun 22, 2002

2,674

14

89

Dallas, TX

Oct 23, 2004

#17

• Oct 23, 2004

• #17

Congrats on the numbers! Sounds like you are ready.

 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member

Nov 24, 2003

1,122

1

0

New Whiteland, IN

Oct 23, 2004

#18

• Oct 23, 2004

• #18

sirsureshot39 said:

Drop the word "blower" and replace it with boost..or forced induction.

Nice numbers, im selling my s-trim to some guy in a few hours now..

Click to expand...

Well, I dont know if I am even going to concider a turbo in the next year or not.
Supercharging seems to work better, and haven't you noticed everyone that has turbo cars have problems and 90% of the time they dont run?
That guy that bought your kit is one lucky sob.
It's the difference between 287rwhp and 475rwhp =(

 

TT91

Active Member

May 23, 2003

1,536

0

36

Paramus, NJ

Oct 23, 2004

#19

• Oct 23, 2004

• #19

IndyBlk5.0 said:

and haven't you noticed everyone that has turbo cars have problems and 90% of the time they dont run?
That guy that bought your kit is one lucky sob.

Click to expand...

Supercharger kits are in stock at almost any serious performance shop. Most people stick with blowers because the ease of installation and be done with it. A turbo isnt something you can just toss on and call it a day. Kits are currently backordered for 2-4 months by some companies.

The following info was taken from turbomustangs.com.

In this month's MM&FF, there is a shoot out between the stock Cobra blower, a twin screw blower, a centrifugal blower, and a twin turbo kit.

The twins blew all the blowers away, except below something like 3000RPM from the positive displacement blowers. Each were limited to 11psi (though the twin screw blower showed about 13psi on one chart ).

Turbos are hands down a far more effiecient power adder, its just alot more complicated.

Why a supercharger will be around....

1. A few of them are street legal, I know in California and turbo kit get hosed unless you "know" somebody to help you get it past smog and inspection.

2. Superchargers are WAY cheaper to get into, $1700-1800 versus the 3-4000 you would spend on a small turbo kit.

3. Lots of people are afraid... Don't know why but I guess turbos are still an unknown for most.

With the stock shortblock as a limitation they will both end up in pretty much the same place. Granted the turbo will have more power under the curve and be quicker on the track but the ease of install and availability are big plusses to the typical street car.

Joe, intrcptrstng is on his way now to get my kit. 2000 for the whole sc kit and aftercooler, and 250 for my longtubes and h-pipe.

 

NYC LSC

Founding Member

Feb 16, 2001

626

0

0

Staten Island, NYC

Oct 23, 2004

#20

• Oct 23, 2004

• #20

Man, those are some NICE numbers! I wouldn't mind seeing those stats on my motor!