• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

car stumbles when cold

  • Thread starter Thread starter icemetalstang
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2009

icemetalstang

New Member
Nov 7, 2007
77
1
0
Dec 11, 2009
#1
  • Dec 11, 2009
  • #1
When I start car after it has been sitting overnight and at work it idles fine. When I give it gas it stumbles and hesitates. If I back off the throttle and ease into to it the car smothes out. After a tenth of a mile no problems and car is smooth. I have cleaned MAF and barely made a difference.

When car is hot it turns over a couple of rotations more and starts slowly. Sometimes I dont think its going to start but it always will.

Feb. new- old- iat sensor, ignition module
Distributer
fuel filter
temperature sensor
tps
injectors
02 sensors
cap, rotor, plugs, wires
iac
ccrm
fuel pump
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 12, 2009
#2
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #2
Have you checked the ECT calibration?
 

icemetalstang

New Member
Nov 7, 2007
77
1
0
Dec 12, 2009
#3
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #3
Im not sure what the ECT calibration is. It only started doing it about a month ago.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 12, 2009
#4
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #4
ECT = Coolant temp sensor. It's the sensor that tells the EEC how cold the engine is. If it's out of calibration (but not absolute spec), it can cause drivability issues, esp when the car is cold and needs enrichment.

If you feel like it, with a cold engine, just turn the key on and take a voltage reading from the sensor.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Dec 12, 2009
#5
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #5
HISSIN50 said:
ECT = Coolant temp sensor. It's the sensor that tells the EEC how cold the engine is. If it's out of calibration (but not absolute spec), it can cause drivability issues, esp when the car is cold and needs enrichment.

If you feel like it, with a cold engine, just turn the key on and take a voltage reading from the sensor.
Click to expand...

Do you happen to have the voltage vs. temp table? I was wondering if it's different from the transmission fluid temp sensor table.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 13, 2009
#6
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #6
Richard, it's the same as the IAT chart if you have that. I don't think I have ECT stuff saved.


IMS, at 50*F (around what a cold engine might see), the ECT should show ~3.7V. When you test it, if it's not between 3 and 4 Volts, something is probably amiss (unless your temps are below freezing or you live in the tropics). If that's so, give us a guess on what the coolant temps were during the test.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Dec 14, 2009
#7
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #7
HISSIN50 said:
Richard, it's the same as the IAT chart if you have that. I don't think I have ECT stuff saved.


IMS, at 50*F (around what a cold engine might see), the ECT should show ~3.7V. When you test it, if it's not between 3 and 4 Volts, something is probably amiss (unless your temps are below freezing or you live in the tropics). If that's so, give us a guess on what the coolant temps were during the test.
Click to expand...

I had forgotten that my AEM software has these tables. The ECT and IAT sensors do indeed have the same voltage vs. temps values. FWIW 50*F = 4.84v in my calibration table.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 14, 2009
#8
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #8
toyman said:
I had forgotten that my AEM software has these tables. The ECT and IAT sensors do indeed have the same voltage vs. temps values. FWIW 50*F = 4.84v in my calibration table.
Click to expand...

Richard, ss that an AEM table (Is it supposed to be for Ford values)?

4.84 is at the extreme of the VREF limit (5.0V +/- 10%). In other words, the ECT would be useless at that temperature or below. The useful range for the sensor voltage is ~ 3.5V to ~ 0.3V.
 

icemetalstang

New Member
Nov 7, 2007
77
1
0
Dec 14, 2009
#9
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #9
My low speed fan was not kicking on. My car had a 117 code. So i replaced the coolant tempature sensor. It was still under warranty. Now it works. The problem is alot less than before. In the morning it will still hesitate. I will check the voltage. I also live in Florida. I cleaned my Iat sensor. It also helped. Problem is still there.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Dec 15, 2009
#10
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #10
HISSIN50 said:
Richard, ss that an AEM table (Is it supposed to be for Ford values)?

4.84 is at the extreme of the VREF limit (5.0V +/- 10%). In other words, the ECT would be useless at that temperature or below. The useful range for the sensor voltage is ~ 3.5V to ~ 0.3V.
Click to expand...

That is the Ford calibration table in the AEM software and is the one that I'm using. 3.5v = 150*F and 1.56v is the minimum voltage for 261*F (fail safe limit). It's just the reverse of the scale you are suggesting ie. useful range is 1.4v ~ 4.99 (261*F ~ 41*F). ECT's below 41* are referenced in the warm up enrichment and the extra start vs. ECT tables but it is not clear how those lower temps are being read. I'll see if I can get clarification on the AEM forum. As I don't use the car in the winter I've never noticed the discrepancy before.
 
S

sln583

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 13, 2004
68
2
9
Quincy, MA
Dec 15, 2009
#11
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #11
Are these the correct values?
Ford Fuel Injection Engine Coolant Temperature Sensor (ECT)

Im having a similar problem.
My 88 cranks and starts, and then after runiing for about 5 seconds, it stalls.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 15, 2009
#12
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #12
sln583 said:
Are these the correct values?
Ford Fuel Injection Engine Coolant Temperature Sensor (ECT)

Im having a similar problem.
My 88 cranks and starts, and then after runiing for about 5 seconds, it stalls.
Click to expand...

Those are correct for a Fox III (I've also checked them against a SN95 IAT, which might or might not have been in calibration. The read values were congruent with what was in the table however).
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Dec 15, 2009
#13
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #13
HISSIN50 said:
Those are correct for a Fox III (I've also checked them against a SN95 IAT, which might or might not have been in calibration. The read values were congruent with what was in the table however).
Click to expand...

WOW. The response back from a AEM moderator was that the temp range provided was correct and is a Ford sensor range limitation. I've sent the link provided to see if there is an calibration table error in the AEMPro software. Seems to me that after this many years any error would have been picked up and corrected but I'm sure stranger things have happened.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Dec 16, 2009
#14
  • Dec 16, 2009
  • #14
It just occurred to me that we are probably talking about two different things. The ECT values in the link are the output voltage readings from the sensor whereas the calibration table I was referring to is different because the EMS uses a pull-up resistor for that circuit. That will alter the voltage vs. temp values and would explain the difference.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 16, 2009
#15
  • Dec 16, 2009
  • #15
That makes sense I think. I poked around on the AEM forum a couple of nights ago, and in a very cursory search I didn't find any raw Ford resistance specs for the Ford ECT (using resistance removes the variable of voltage-push through the thermistor).

I have another source which almost parallels the FFI info above.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
1994 Cobra - Fuel Pressure Drops Revving at Idle
  • IconicSilverGT500
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
361
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 24, 2026
Mcmahst
T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
394
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
747
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
86_Capri
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
431
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?