• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Carb choice: Demon, Edelbrock, or Holly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter killer medic
  • Start date Start date Feb 28, 2006

killer medic

Member
Mar 30, 2005
60
0
6
West Palm Beach, FL.
Feb 28, 2006
#1
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #1
I am looking to purchase a carb that had good performance, but not necessarily a racing carb; something with a good mixture of tunibility, performance, and ease of use. Any ideas? I have a 302 that I plan on buy a 4B intake soon. That's another decision, the intake. Any good combinations???
 

jes72mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
224
1
0
S. Central PA
Feb 28, 2006
#2
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #2
If ease of use is primary, go with the edelbrock, they are basically a plug and play carb, very little conitual tuning needed after initial set-up.
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Feb 28, 2006
#3
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #3
I vote Holley or Demon

I have used all of these and the Edelbrook is a great carb but I prefer being able to really tune on one and the other are easier. I have a Demon Vac. sec. right now and cant wait to try it out. If you want to save some money on an intake you can do an Ebay search for "ford polished intake" and you'll see a seller with new "professional Products" dual planes. I bought one and have been impressed with it but until this car moves I cant say much more. I would suggest buying a new or nearly new carb though whichever way you go..Bunch of junk out there.
 

FORCED2DV8

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
458
0
0
Grand Rapids MI
Feb 28, 2006
#4
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #4
Shakin66 said:
I have used all of these and the Edelbrook is a great carb but I prefer being able to really tune on one and the other are easier. I have a Demon Vac. sec. right now and cant wait to try it out. If you want to save some money on an intake you can do an Ebay search for "ford polished intake" and you'll see a seller with new "professional Products" dual planes. I bought one and have been impressed with it but until this car moves I cant say much more. I would suggest buying a new or nearly new carb though whichever way you go..Bunch of junk out there.
Click to expand...



I agree, the edelbrock is ok, But the past 3 carbs I have bought have been Demons, And I have excellent results with them, If you order the correct carb for your application from them, it comes pretty close to right on, And adjusting them is very easy.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 28, 2006
#5
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #5
jes72mustang said:
If ease of use is primary, go with the edelbrock, they are basically a plug and play carb, very little conitual tuning needed after initial set-up.
Click to expand...
Here we go again. Holleys also don't require constant tuning and they are just as easy to set up. I had THREE Holleys on my 331 in my Ranger and I went a whole year without having to touch them. Then when the tune did get out of whack, it wasn't the carbs. Only thing that gets a Holley out of tune, is dirty fuel, or water in the fuel. 99.9% of the rest of the time, it's the rest of the motor that's out of tune ( ignition or timing) Once you set a Holley, LEAVE IT ALONE.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 28, 2006
#6
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #6
killer medic said:
I am looking to purchase a carb that had good performance, but not necessarily a racing carb; something with a good mixture of tunibility, performance, and ease of use. Any ideas? I have a 302 that I plan on buy a 4v intake soon. That's another decision, the intake. Any good combinations???
Click to expand...
Good combo? Ford Racing A321 intake, topped with a Holley list 1850, 600 cfm 4bbl, or a 570 Street Avenger. With either, make sure to buy a secondary spring assortment and play with it to get the secondaries open sooner. The 1850 for sure, they come with a stiff sec. spring ( black) put in a white or purple. And if you don't understand carbs, get a Holley manual with it. And run at least one inline fuel filter, two's better.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Feb 28, 2006
#7
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #7
Decided to put that 2 grand intom the 67 eh, good luck with that. I dont know but I got a killer deal on a slightly used Demon 650 mech secondaries with an edelbrock RPM intake. Got it for $150. The engine is currently in "build" stage so I geuss I'll see how it dose.

BTW: If I hadn't gotten a deal on the carb, I probly would have gon Vac secondaries.

Tyler
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Feb 28, 2006
#8
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #8
and as some of my friends found out recently, if you live in an area where the gas sucks, Holleys will give you trouble. They HATE crud.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 28, 2006
#9
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #9
all three carbs are very good, but i prefer the edelbrock carb. mostly because they have more tunability than the holley or the demon, but they also have more room for mistakes in the tuning process than the holley or the demon. all three carbs dont require constant tuning, but they do require good fuel filters to prevent being gummed up with junk.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Feb 28, 2006
#10
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #10
I have had all three carbs on my vehicles at one time or another. I started with Holley back in the 80's and still perfer them. They other carbs are not bad in my mind, but I have had the best luck with my Holleys.
 
M

Mosse

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
229
0
0
Finland, Tampere
Mar 1, 2006
#11
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #11
Just changed from Ed 600 to Holley 650DP.. Let´s see how it works. Expecting some gains on upper register.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
245
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
S
CFI to carb conversion question
  • StockerStang
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
536
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
246
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?