• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Carb. / Dist. vaccuum line question. 69, 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter Old Blue
  • Start date Start date Apr 24, 2005
O

Old Blue

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
58
0
0
Apr 24, 2005
#1
  • Apr 24, 2005
  • #1
I just bought a new edelbrock 600cfm electric choke carb. My 69 has the stock 302, which used to be a 2v. i changed the manifold over to a 4v. the vaccuum line from the distributor was never hooked up.

Looking through the instructions to the carb it says i need to know wether my dist vaccuum is a "timed" or "full" vaccuum so that i can hook it up to the appropriate line on the carb.

Anyone know which type my dist is?

appreciate it.
 
M

markstang1969

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
21
0
0
Apr 24, 2005
#2
  • Apr 24, 2005
  • #2
Old Blue said:
I just bought a new edelbrock 600cfm electric choke carb. My 69 has the stock 302, which used to be a 2v. i changed the manifold over to a 4v. the vaccuum line from the distributor was never hooked up.

Looking through the instructions to the carb it says i need to know wether my dist vaccuum is a "timed" or "full" vaccuum so that i can hook it up to the appropriate line on the carb.

Anyone know which type my dist is?

appreciate it.
Click to expand...

I don't know the answer, but I love your car. I hope mine looks that good when I am through. I am getting the complete shop manuals in the mail this week. If I find an answer I'll let you know, especially since I plan on going Edelbrock myself.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Apr 25, 2005
#3
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #3
It should be ported vacuum, not manifoild vacuum. The fitting should be above the throttle plates on the carb. You should get no vacuum signal at idle from that port.
 
R

ravenblack67

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
46
0
0
Apr 25, 2005
#4
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #4
The passenger side carb port is timed. The driver side is full. I have tried both. There is a lot of debate as to which is best.
 
O

Old Blue

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
58
0
0
Apr 25, 2005
#5
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #5
markstang1969 said:
I don't know the answer, but I love your car. I hope mine looks that good when I am through. I am getting the complete shop manuals in the mail this week. If I find an answer I'll let you know, especially since I plan on going Edelbrock myself.
Click to expand...

Hey thanks a lot for the compliment!

I guess i will play around with which vaccuum port to use. the car runs very nicely, good throttle response and power.

it just has a high idle that i attribute to a vaccuum problem. and since all the gaskets are new, and i dont have any vaccuum lines running to the carb other than the PCV it must be the line that goes from the distibutor to the carb, or lack of.

wish me luck
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Apr 25, 2005
#6
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #6
The edelbrock manual says to use the full port on the driver's side for cars without emission control. I'm using the exact set-up as yourself and run it this way, although I have seen others on the site here reccomend the timed port without any reason as to why.

The manual is your friend, as is the edelbrock website.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Apr 25, 2005
#7
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #7
There is a good reason why to run ported. If you run straight manifold vacuum to the vacuum advance, it is really not much different than advance the base timing manually when you set it. It will be at full vacuum advance, even at idle.

Ported vacuum is used because it adjusts timing based on throttle position, load and rpm. That's why the factory uses ported in about 99% of all cases for Fords.

Also, if you use manifold vacuum to the vacuum advance, you decrease the range of advance in your dizzy, since the mechanical advance in stock Ford dizzys is meant to run in conjunction with ported vacuum advance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
243
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
776
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
Vacuum line question?
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
167
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
333
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
300
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?