• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

carb ecu?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter palemall
  • Start date Start date Aug 26, 2006
P

palemall

New Member
Jul 30, 2006
18
0
0
Aug 26, 2006
#1
  • Aug 26, 2006
  • #1
i know carb motors didn't have a ecu but did the carburated turbos have them
 

TurboFlush

Founding Member
Dec 8, 1999
1,984
0
0
Germany
Aug 27, 2006
#2
  • Aug 27, 2006
  • #2
both actually did have an ecu type box. sits on the right hand side. the turbo version however has one or two more plugs on it to sense pressure. All they do is control when and how the ignition is advanced and retarded. the rest is up to the carb.


TF
 
L

Lscman

New Member
Jun 29, 2006
21
0
0
Sep 2, 2006
#3
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #3
palemall said:
i know carb motors didn't have a ecu but did the carburated turbos have them
Click to expand...

Before the EFI days, Ford progressively rolled-out electronic feedback carburetors on their 2.3L motors for better efficiency and less pollution. The implementation was done in the 1980 thru 1982 timeframe and California cars likely saw it first. These updated "standard design carbs" (not variable venturi) simply had an electronically-controlled intermediate throttle jetting. Basically an O2 sensor was bolted onto the exhaust manifold to moinitor A/F mixture in real-time and a simple electronic module was added to feed a solenoid-controlled part throttle mixture jet in the carb. These systems were somewhat trouble-prone.

My 49 state (non-Calif) N/A 1981 2.3L Fox car with manual tranny had one of these electronic feedback 2bbl carbs on it and the larger 3 way cat. My 1979 2.3L Turbo did not have an electronic carb. I suspect that none of the 1979 2.3L cars have this electronics and by 1982, they probably all do. The turbo vs non-turbo issue is somewhat separate.

My cars are opposite your claim, as the turbo did not have electronic carbs while the N/A did.

If you're referring to the distributor ignition control, the reply above should be adequate.

Hope this helps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Q
Resolved 96 crown Vic ECU in a mustang gt
  • QuickDibbles
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
632
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 27, 2025
Noobz347
C
Bored with my 73
  • Curtis Harper
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
156
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2026
RaggedGT
G
Crazy fuel issue lifting fuel rails
  • greenhornponyguy
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
309
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 18, 2026
bmmckl
R
93 LX 2.3 Trouble codes 53, 85, 21 help
  • Rickshaw302
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
17
Views
517
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
D
Help Identifying cam
  • dropteeth
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
126
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2025
dropteeth
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?