• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Carbureted Intake Advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bainbridge Bob
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2014
B

Bainbridge Bob

New Member
May 12, 2014
1
0
1
May 12, 2014
#1
  • May 12, 2014
  • #1
Finally pulled my bone stock 85 GT out of storage and the rear carb bowl sprung a leak on first start, ended up with a small barbecue. Luckily no paint or wiring damage, but the rats nest of emissions tubing at the back of the motor roasted.

Rather than replumb all of that crap I'm ditching the 4180 emissions carb in favor of something more normal, either a Holley street avenger or a 4160. I'm also considering replacing the factory intake while I'm at it to squeeze a little more out of the setup.

This is a street car that is mainly used for my wife to take to cruise ins, so driveablity is key. Has anyone out there used one of the dual plane manifolds like the Edlebrock Performer or Weiand Street Warrior in place of the factory unit and gotten worth while performance improvements? I've got other hot rods to play with so no need to get too radical on this one. Yet.
 

Killa

Active Member
Jul 9, 2007
1,006
56
49
May 12, 2014
#2
  • May 12, 2014
  • #2
brb
 
Last edited: May 12, 2014

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
May 12, 2014
#3
  • May 12, 2014
  • #3
I trust car crafts opinions and testing on a lot of things. Heres a link to an article comparing various intakes if you would like to read it.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/1309_dual_plane_intake_manifold_comparisons/
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 13, 2014
#4
  • May 13, 2014
  • #4
i used an older weiand action plus intake with an edelbrock 600cfm carb, and got decent performance.
 

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
May 13, 2014
#5
  • May 13, 2014
  • #5
The other thing to take into account is what rpm your cam operates best in. Example: For my engine rebuild I have a B303 cam and its advertised power band is from 3000-6000 RPM. I went and looked for intakes that either flow best through that rpm band or flow great over the entire range from idle to 6000 RPM. Just a way to make sure that you are matching all your parts characteristics and taking a systems approach to it. If you are using the stock camshaft then I would imagine using an intake that operates best from idle to 6000 RPM would be your best bet.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 14, 2014
#6
  • May 14, 2014
  • #6
Good advice GoldenEagle91.
To answer the question directly, I used the Edelbrock performer (5.0 or RPM?) with
EGR and a Holley 1850 with electric choke. I had a nasty cam and rhodes lifters so it idled near stock. It got about 25 mpg on the highway and still beat Camaros. Highly recommended, until I killed the SROD tranny.
 
Reactions: GoldenEagle91

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
May 14, 2014
#7
  • May 14, 2014
  • #7
Matching rpm band is key ....but roasting bbq carb style is another reason I like fuel injected over complete disasters when a carb or supporting part screws up.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
May 17, 2014
#8
  • May 17, 2014
  • #8
not sure if you'll notice much power difference from an intake swap without swapping the heads too...the factory ford intake is an aluminum unit that I've heard is very similar to an early edelbrock piece... However I've had a lot of luck with the weiand stealth intakes.

The street avengers are problematic, nothing but issues with mine too...spend the cash to get a better carb.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 17, 2014
#9
  • May 17, 2014
  • #9
Now you mention it, the 1850-2 that I ran was a swap meet find I rebuilt. The last Holley I bought new had a smashed o ring on the primary needle float and a plug that leaked on that bowl. Not cool to pay extra for a shiny finish and get two defects!
 

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
May 19, 2014
#10
  • May 19, 2014
  • #10
I was looking at one of these prior to buying my car that currently has the 670 cfm street avenger in it. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/hly-0-80508s/overview/ . I know that a 750 might be a tad too much for just going to cruise nights but its $80 cheaper than a comparable 650 I looked at.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 19, 2014
#11
  • May 19, 2014
  • #11
The 750 cfm will be offset by the vac secondaries. So unlike a double pumper, it should be driveable and tuneable.

But the OP will be happier with a 600 cfm vac secondary on a stock 85. It should need less tuning, has a better match to the max cfm needed, and should get better cruise mpg. For tuning, a quick change kit for the secondary spring should be a required upgrade. Your carb may come with it from the factory.

DO NOT buy the clear plastic fuel bowl plugs! The heads pop off and then you have a fuel leak. They are a fire hazard!
 

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
May 19, 2014
#12
  • May 19, 2014
  • #12
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
716
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
P
New to StangNET
  • Popeye1790
  • Apr 19, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
900
The Welcome Wagon Apr 19, 2024
Popeye1790
P
N
Having some drivetrain issues, need some advice...
  • Nicktheqwik
  • Nov 25, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2021
Monkeybutt2000
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?