• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Cat back for the 93

  • Thread starter Thread starter smokin joe
  • Start date Start date Apr 8, 2009

Catback for the 93

  • Flowmaster Force II

    Votes: 9 34.6%
  • Magnaflow

    Votes: 9 34.6%
  • Bassani

    Votes: 8 30.8%

  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed May 23, 2009.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Strippt88

New Member
Nov 24, 2006
81
0
0
Cedar Lake, Indiana
May 3, 2009
#41
  • May 3, 2009
  • #41
Darkwriter77 said:
Trust me, the fitment on Flowmaster's cat-backs is CRAP. Sure, the 40-series mufflers they use in the American Thunder kit sound good ... on the OUTSIDE of the car ... but they drone like a mofo on the inside. If you're into drone, then by all means go for it, but if you actually plan to drive your car any long distances or on a daily basis, you'll probably get sick of it pretty quick.

Again, Frankenstang's Capri has a Flowmaster cat-back on it behind an off-road X-pipe, and it does sound pretty decent overall, but they're the Delta series mufflers - they don't drone, but they're also more quiet, and their flow characteristics SUCK (about as bad as stock mufflers). Plus, it took some bending and beating on the hangers and cutting an inch or so off one tailpipe to get the tailpipes to fit straight and even. Flowmaster welds the flow tubes to their mufflers in advance, so you have almost no room for adjustment ... which really sucks because no two cars are really 100% the same when it comes to making things line up straight.
Click to expand...

Maybe I'm just old, but Flowmaster 40's was one of the best setups when we raced 20 years ago, both sound and function, and went on my 88 last year like they always did, nice. They sound like a proper 5.0 should sound, specially when mated to the Ford Racing o/r H hanging under my Mustangs for 21 years also. They are the first, best 5.0 aftermarket muffler, and all others still compare themselves to it. Unless they went out of business, my 5.0 and I will be buried together, and Flowmasters will be there for that, too. An alternative would be the Magnaflows, they come the closest, without the slop or rasp some of the other cheap systems make just to sound loud. I did use Dynomax tails, the stock appearance is what I like, and they make the best. Interesting, alluding to the stock mufflers as bad. Back in the day, and I still have the articles(in the pile), but in 2 different shootouts, Car Craft and Muscle Car Review, I believe, tested mufflers on 5.0's, using an o/r H. Flowmaster, Walker Dynomax, some nonames that are now gone, no muffler at all(lots of guys dumped the muffler alltogether- and kept the factory H-could't tell you why)The stock Ford muffler was one of the best you could get, for both flow and sound- and I ran my otherwise stock exhaust to mid 13's on VR's using them. They were fantastic sounding, when you threw away the stock H, which was the weak link in the stock exhaust system(cept for those factory headers). If I could find a set of stockers NOS, I'd prolly throw them on. 40's on a road trip? Thats why the make Lincolns!
 

MahFiVeOh

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
531
9
49
Ontario, Canada
May 4, 2009
#42
  • May 4, 2009
  • #42
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
You guys saying Magnaflows are mellow, do you have them on a stock car or what? When i'm rompin on mine it sounds like the gates of hell opened up behind me.

I also can't stand their tail pipes, but they would look great with a Cobra bumper.

Macs are probably my second favorite with Spintechs a close 3rd.
Click to expand...

My car is stock and the Magnaflow catback was very quiet imo.I agree about the tailpipes but when i bought mine they still had the old style where the 3inch stainless went back behind the tire.
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
May 4, 2009
#43
  • May 4, 2009
  • #43
MACS!!!!! dont say no till u hear my new stroker woudn't trade em for any other brands
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
May 4, 2009
#44
  • May 4, 2009
  • #44
i voted for magnaflow but if i had the money i would buy the bassani kit.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
763
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
695
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
G
Quiet my 2015 GT on the cheap
  • gsrblack
  • Feb 12, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
6
Views
788
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Apr 16, 2025
gkomo
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
222
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?