• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

CEL came on today

  • Thread starter Thread starter 03redgtstang
  • Start date Start date May 19, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
May 25, 2007
#21
  • May 25, 2007
  • #21
Yeah thats it.
But its not as hard as it seems in the chart. If you drive steady for for about 25 miles after cold start up, with a few miles around 45-50 mph, and a few around 55-65,then make a couple of stops with a couple min. idle time, they will set . You don't really have to concentrate on doing it exactly like the chart says. But fuel level needs to be 1/4 to 3/4 tank and ambient(outside temp) temp needs to be above 40 deg
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
May 30, 2007
#22
  • May 30, 2007
  • #22
Hm ok update on this. Curious as to some new info I found out. I took it to a shop which I know and they read the code for me. They had what looked to be a much better and definetly larger scanner and it gave some more detailed info too. It just read Bank 2 Sensor 1 o2 sensor slow to respond. Wouldn't this mean I just switched to a better breathing pipe and I might just need to get the MIL eliminators?

I know its the upstream sensor so you guys said I won't need them because its not my problem but doesnt the front one read the back and back reads front and so on and that could be my problem?
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
May 30, 2007
#23
  • May 30, 2007
  • #23
bump
 
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
May 30, 2007
#24
  • May 30, 2007
  • #24
no not exactly. that would be the cataylst monitor that compares the front and back. when it runs it is looking for the front O2 to switch several times more than the rear,thats how it knows that the catalytic convertor is working,if it doesn't see the correct ratio it will set codes P0420/P0430.
Did you say you had already tried another O2 sensor?
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
May 30, 2007
#25
  • May 30, 2007
  • #25
no i didnt because I figured I would rather throw like 30 bucks at mils than try over 100 at a new 02 and find out I dont need it. But if you're saying still with new info I gave that its prolly the 02 then I will probably go ahead and try that.
 
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
May 31, 2007
#26
  • May 31, 2007
  • #26
I am leaning towards this simply because it is the only code you are getting if I am reading this correctly. I would expect to see some other codes like P0171/P0174 if vehicle was actually running lean. If I had it on a scope I could be absolutley sure but just based on the info you have here I would strongly suspect that the O2 has just got lazy.
 

Twista

Active Member
May 7, 2004
510
2
29
@ the z00 in chicago
May 31, 2007
#27
  • May 31, 2007
  • #27
If i street drive (stop and go) than it doesnt come on till acouple days.

When i drive 1 constant speed on the highway it comes on ASAP.
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
May 31, 2007
#28
  • May 31, 2007
  • #28
chuck943 said:
I am leaning towards this simply because it is the only code you are getting if I am reading this correctly. I would expect to see some other codes like P0171/P0174 if vehicle was actually running lean. If I had it on a scope I could be absolutley sure but just based on the info you have here I would strongly suspect that the O2 has just got lazy.
Click to expand...

No, well Im not sure but I took it to autozone first before and the guy said po153 but there was still a list of other codes that were on the obdII they were like maf, running lean etc. But he said it was the po153 was the code it was giving, im confused.
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
May 31, 2007
#29
  • May 31, 2007
  • #29
03redgtstang said:
Ok guys I just recently put bassani catback and catted x pipe on my 03 gt. Installed about 2 weeks ago and hadnt had a problem. Thursday I took it to a shop to go everything tightened down and have a manifold bolt replaced. Everything was fine until yesterday Friday when my CEL came on. Error code reads P0153 which is 02 sensor/A couple other possible problems. Could the shop have screwed with something? What do you guys recommend checking? Thanks
Click to expand...

Thats why in this I said / a couple other problems, I didn't really know why he would say there was 1 code that was thrown but then I also saw a list of other codes like maf and running lean.
 
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
May 31, 2007
#30
  • May 31, 2007
  • #30
well that makes a difference.
Do you remember the other codes? If you had a MAF code thats the area u would need to concentrate on. That is were it all starts for the PCM. See the engine is nothing more than a big pump pulling air in and pushing air out. The PCM in order to control combustion has to know exactly how much air the engine is taking in in order to do this, it controls this by reading the O2 sensors, it then makes adjustments accordingly and looks at the O2's to see if that worked. If it is getting a false reading from MAF then it will never make the correction correctly. Do you have a way to look at data logger? That would help alot. Would be very helpful to know what the Baro reading is and also what short and long fuel trims are doing.
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
May 31, 2007
#31
  • May 31, 2007
  • #31
data logger?
 
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
May 31, 2007
#32
  • May 31, 2007
  • #32
some scan tools will let you look at live data from the sensors so you can see what PCM is seeing. Based on what you told me earlier that you had other codes, lean and MAF, I would suggest you try one more thing and see if it works. Unhook your battery for about 30 minutes so stradegies will reset, while you are doing this clean your MAF sensor with electrical cleaner( make sure that you get any black soot off of sensor wires inside it), make sure it has dried before hooking power back to it, then see if this corrects your problem. If this doesn't work you might ought to let a good professional look at it(not auto zone!!).
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
May 31, 2007
#33
  • May 31, 2007
  • #33
Ok Ill give that a go and let you know. BTW I really appreciate the quick responses and great advice man. Im a little new at all this lol.
 
0

03redgtstang

Banned
Apr 24, 2007
105
0
0
Jun 2, 2007
#34
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #34
i looked at the maf today and looks as new as they day it was put on. Im gonna get a better scan on it and give exactly what it reads
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Most ridiculous / dishonest work you have heard a shop recommend?
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 19, 2026
  • Off-Topic Hangout
Replies
4
Views
142
Off-Topic Hangout Jul 20, 2026
SchwarzStock
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
370
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
B
More Issues With New Edge
  • Blackout67
  • May 3, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2025
Blackout67
B
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?