• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

challenger

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoffsgt
  • Start date Start date Jul 20, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Jul 20, 2008
#1
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #1
saw my first new challenger today. ran next to him for a couple of miles trying to get his attention but he was on the phone (or pretending to be) the whole time. i guess thats something u can do when ur car doesn't come with a manual transmission. was hoping to post the first challenger kill story. they're not as ugly in person as i thought though.

Posted via Mobile Device
 
S

spitfirees20

New Member
Nov 17, 2006
38
0
0
Jul 20, 2008
#2
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #2
Those are sweet looking cars, too bad they weigh so damn much and only come with autos right now.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Jul 20, 2008
#3
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #3
I got to check one out at a dealership while i was picking up a car for work and they look pretty good. It is rather heavy though. And they definately need to have a manual trans option.
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Jul 20, 2008
#4
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #4
They pre-sold 3 of them for $58K apiece at a dealership here.
 

blckstng96

Member
Apr 13, 2004
208
0
16
Jul 20, 2008
#5
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #5
yea i saw one in black and it was rediculously nice,auto trans and massive wight though deff sucks,did an incredible job on design though in mh opinion,so much like the old one
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
Jul 20, 2008
#6
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #6
As so often happens with Chrysler they have a great idea but fail to thoroughly come through all the way.

I haven't seen one yet but did manage to see a Ford GT out prowling around today.
 

what9612

Member
Apr 11, 2005
43
0
7
Warren, MI
Jul 20, 2008
#7
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #7
i live in Michigan so i see alot of them. too bad all of them r drivin by a 55 or older person. i tried to get there attention they wont even look over
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Jul 20, 2008
#8
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #8
with the ridiculus mark-ups on them who else could afford one?


and anybody that knows better will wait until they release a manual trans version anyway...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 20, 2008
#9
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #9
Just so you guys are aware, there is a base model SE version.

It will have the 17" wheels and comes with a 3.5L engine and 250HP....automatic only

The R/T is the hemi version with 365HP and available 6-spd.

Then there's the 6.1L SRT-8.


I have a feeling we'll be running into a lot of V6 challengers on the road. Base price is $21K. In 2-3 years it will be the equivalent of V6 Mustangs all over.

Interesting how Dodge gets 250HP from a 3.5L while ford can only get 210 from a 4.0. I wonder how much torque they have? They are heavy so i don't think they would be a prob. I am not so sure about the R/T though
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Jul 20, 2008
#10
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #10
but is anything but the SRT8 with an auto yet?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 20, 2008
#11
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #11
I've seen one on the road that was def not an SRT-8. Unsure if it was an SE or R/T just yet. I don't know the visual cues to distinguish them yet.
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Jul 20, 2008
#12
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #12
I thought they were only releasing the srt-8 this year?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 20, 2008
#13
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #13
http://forums.stangnet.com/756291-new-challenger-r-t-spotted-wild.html#post7567940
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Jul 20, 2008
#14
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #14
Those cars look so............good but weigh so...........much. I would still like an R/T. Do a few mods and it would probably be easy to put down 400 rwhp N/A and run mid 12s.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Jul 20, 2008
#15
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #15
I saw 1 @ the local dealership 4 the 1st time last week & I love em....although they look big, bulky & heavy, but IMO I like them more then all the new Stangs besides the GT500 & the Parnelli.... It also looks like it would be a nice DD with just enough power & could easily seat 4 adults comfortably....

Here are a few pics I took....














 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jul 20, 2008
#16
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #16
A buddy of mine just got one for sticker, it came in last week and he gets to pick it up this Friday or Saturday.

I've seen the car and it is amazing. I love it and it’s my favorite non Mustang car right now. The only thing that’s gay about it is carbon fiber stickers on the hood. He’s building a custom shaker hood for it and adding a 100-150 shot of nitrous for it. His hood will be real carbon fiber.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 20, 2008
#17
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #17
It just needs fatter tires.

SRT comes with 245's. Seems kinda narrow for a car with 400+ HP.


R/T has 235's and SE has 215's.


Great looking car though. An R/T would be right in my price range if i was in the market for a RWD Muscle car.
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
Jul 20, 2008
#18
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #18
I have to admit that is one sweet looking car. The Camaro on the other hand.....
 
C

ceracer33

New Member
Aug 30, 2005
118
1
0
Jul 20, 2008
#19
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #19
too bad they put the same ugly steering wheel in everything. but really i love that car. its bad ass. if i were in the market for a new sports car, its probably what i would buy when the srt came out in the 6 speed.
 

3ponyshow

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2002
319
1
18
Las Vegas
Jul 20, 2008
#20
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #20
I saw one about 2 months ago driving on the North side of Vegas bewteen 3 Chargers, all black so I didn't even notice it at first. It was flat black with black steel rims and black walls. Apparently, to not draw attention to itself and it worked. I thought originally it was 4 chargers, maybe in a club or something. Then I saw it again further up on the side of the road and instantly identified it. Unfortunately it was sputtering and overheating. To bad, because I really was considering one of these until I saw that. I hate first year anything.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
929
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
TB Injection Install (Aces Killshot)
  • LILCBRA
  • Feb 5, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
21K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Dec 1, 2024
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?