• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech

Changes!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter bill_brenda
  • Start date Start date May 13, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
K

kystang1889

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
199
0
0
ky
May 18, 2005
#21
  • May 18, 2005
  • #21
The Shelby Name Plate Doesn't Raise The Price, Shelby Himself Said In A Press Confrence That The Gt500 Was For All To Enjoy And That Base Price Will Be Under 40k
 
M

Mikesan

New Member
May 16, 2005
11
0
0
May 19, 2005
#22
  • May 19, 2005
  • #22
SVTdriver said:
Yeah but go do it on a mustang gt.
Click to expand...

The Mustang GT is the 5% exception because Ford didn't make enough and demand is high right now. V6's are now advertised here in NorCal for $16,888. By next year anyone who wants one will be able to get a GT for $300-$500 over invoice easy. Just a prediction.

My goal for a GT500 is $1000 below MSRP. Will I be able to do that in the first few months? No way. By the end of the second year run? Probably. I'm glad Ford says they will make enough to satisfy all the demand. Because if they limited the production, only the rich would be able to buy them and they'd sit in heated garages with covers on them. In 30 years a pristine one will be worth a whole lot more than the MSRP.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
May 19, 2005
#23
  • May 19, 2005
  • #23
Mikesan said:
The Mustang GT is the 5% exception because Ford didn't make enough and demand is high right now. V6's are now advertised here in NorCal for $16,888. By next year anyone who wants one will be able to get a GT for $300-$500 over invoice easy. Just a prediction.

My goal for a GT500 is $1000 below MSRP. Will I be able to do that in the first few months? No way. By the end of the second year run? Probably. I'm glad Ford says they will make enough to satisfy all the demand. Because if they limited the production, only the rich would be able to buy them and they'd sit in heated garages with covers on them. In 30 years a pristine one will be worth a whole lot more than the MSRP.
Click to expand...

http://www.invoicedealers.com/cars/Features.asp?model=2577&trim=16636

The invoice price seems to typically be about $2200 less than MSRP. So if you can get it for $1k below MSRP. Than you are about the same as the dealer. However I only have to wait for the car to be built. Not wait for a second production year. This is an important factor to me.
 

kristopher

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
8
0
0
Mesa, Arizona
May 19, 2005
#24
  • May 19, 2005
  • #24
bill_brenda said:
Let's see:
They changed the Shelby letters on the back
Changed the front splitter shape
Changed the hood
Back off from all the leather inside
Changed the tires and rims
The Stripes will be tape instead of painted

Is this bait and switch?
Click to expand...

Any chance they will drop the solid axle and go with IRS?
 
B

bill_brenda

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
10
0
0
May 20, 2005
#25
  • May 20, 2005
  • #25
kristopher said:
Any chance they will drop the solid axle and go with IRS?
Click to expand...
I wished! It would put the car in another level.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
May 20, 2005
#26
  • May 20, 2005
  • #26
bill_brenda said:
I wished! It would put the car in another level.
Click to expand...

Of pricing most likely.
 

Mickey21

New Member
May 10, 2002
43
0
0
Austin, TX
May 25, 2005
#27
  • May 25, 2005
  • #27
So true.... The IRS is not going to happen.... And with all the power and looks, I am not going to miss it that much....
 
K

kystang1889

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
199
0
0
ky
Jun 16, 2005
#28
  • Jun 16, 2005
  • #28
most mustang owners drag race there cars and don't want irs thats why they left it out
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Jun 18, 2005
#29
  • Jun 18, 2005
  • #29
didnt i read a bunch of places before the 05 came out that this new mustang, not just this shelby, was desgined with irs in mind? not just an add in make it fit thing like the old stangs.
 
K

kystang1889

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
199
0
0
ky
Jun 19, 2005
#30
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #30
they thought about designing it for irs but decided against it
 

Pliskin

New Member
Jul 27, 2004
109
0
0
Jun 24, 2005
#31
  • Jun 24, 2005
  • #31
"This engine was first put into service in the limited-edition 2000 SVT Mustang Cobra R, a car that Car and Driver magazine ran from 0 to 60 mph in 4.7 seconds and from 0 to 100 in 11 seconds, and that was without a supercharger."

Wow.
 

sam_abuelsamid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
13
0
0
Jun 27, 2005
#32
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #32
"Bait and Switch" ?

No! Bait and switch is when you advertise one thing and try and sell something else instead. In this case the car that ford have shown so far is a concept, not a production vehicle. ford has not anounced any final production specs or prices yet so nothing is official. This is no different than when they showed the concept mustangs at the 2003 auto shows or the mach III concept in 92. Final equipment and specs may vary. Power for one thing will actually be higher than the concept. Expect 475-480 for production although current prototypes are actually running about 505.

IRS?

Not gonna happen. Some of the early cobra mules had IRS but they decided to revert to a solid axle for weight, durability and performance reasons. The IRS was heavier, more expensive and didn't add to performance. Since the GT500 is gonna be in the 3800 lb range, the extra weight just couldn't be justified. Besides, just take a look at the grand am cup cars and you will see that the live axle works just fine.
 

97StallionGT

Member
Apr 6, 2005
113
0
16
Easley, SC
Jul 21, 2005
#33
  • Jul 21, 2005
  • #33
TrueBlueCajun said:
I agree with everything you've said......except for the centered Cobra emblem on the grille. Keep it to the side for the Retro nostagia look. It wouldn't hurt to keep it to the side. As long as it has the HP and performance they claim, I'm all for it. The Shelby name just brings the price up so if it was up to me, I'd prefer to have the name off so the cost could be lower. We don't need another Saleen/Roush Mustang (higher priced Mustang due to a name splattered on the car).
Click to expand...

I agree...I love the offcenter cobra emblem
 

Play Fast

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
70
0
0
Virginia
Jul 22, 2005
#34
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #34
kystang1889 said:
most mustang owners drag race there cars and don't want irs thats why they left it out
Click to expand...

I though I read somewhere that during testing with the '05 GT they also found that the irs actually made the cornering performance worse than the solid rear axle did. Am I dreaming or does anyone else remember reading that?
 
K

kystang1889

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
199
0
0
ky
Jul 24, 2005
#35
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #35
Play Fast said:
I though I read somewhere that during testing with the '05 GT they also found that the irs actually made the cornering performance worse than the solid rear axle did. Am I dreaming or does anyone else remember reading that?
Click to expand...


I don't think i read that anywhere but its possible i guess, from what i've hurd of the GT's they handle better then older cobras with irs
 

nonsensez9

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
12
0
0
Canada
Aug 4, 2005
#36
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #36
Mikesan said:
My goal for a GT500 is $1000 below MSRP. Will I be able to do that in the first few months? No way. By the end of the second year run?
Click to expand...

are they going to make them again in '08?

and what of additional mustangs such as the new Boss and mach that have been rumored?
 
D

Dyoct

Member
Jul 13, 2005
77
0
7
Aug 7, 2005
#37
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #37
Sam up there pretty much hit it right. The show cars you may have seen are built for display. Hence if you check out the wheels, you will notice the valve stems are found behind the spokes, not easily accessible. And yes, the interior is very leather laden. And now the hood has changed as well. But you gotta keep in mind, that marketing is aiming for $41K MSRP and this is with a vehicle that as of last word should put out 500 horse to go with the nameplate, GT500 will now stand for the power rating. You try building a limited run, last word was 7,200 units, at 500hp, give it a warranty, and keep it at $41K to win over Corvette and Viper buyers. Besides, Ford's gotta ton of over problems right now dealing with structure and whether or not they give this summer's intern a job offer when they leave in a couple of weeks.
 
D

Dyoct

Member
Jul 13, 2005
77
0
7
Aug 7, 2005
#38
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #38
nonsensez9 said:
are they going to make them again in '08?

and what of additional mustangs such as the new Boss and mach that have been rumored?
Click to expand...

Current news says no
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
How To Decode
  • Malcoll1
  • Mar 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
229
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2026
FoxChasis
F
G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
369
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 5, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
89 LX Electrical Troubles
  • fun331
  • Oct 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
316
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 27, 2025
fun331
D
Engine Coolant and Radio Issues
  • Don7Up
  • Sep 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
563
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2025
Don7Up
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?