• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Changing Gear Ratio On A T5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Davedacarpainter
  • Start date Start date Sep 4, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Sep 14, 2017
#41
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #41
Seems nowadays everything HAS to be aluminum. But you won't find any aluminum gears, just boxes to contain them. If only an iron T-5 box were available.

Yeah, engines are aluminum, too. With carefully placed gussets and strengthening shelves where lots of distortion is expected. But, NO aluminum crankshaft. Or other highly-stressed parts. Because aluminum stretches and bends easier than iron or steel. A hunk of steel, ANY steel, hard or soft, has a Modulus of Elasticity of 30 million psi; Aluminum is about 13 million. That means an aluminum part compared to a steel one will deflect 2-1/2 times as much as the steel one. For wearing purposes, only 1 or 2 types of aluminum alloy are suitable for bearing surfaces, Aluminum Bronze being one. I used it when making my live steam locomotive, for the pistons and valves. Here I go, off-thread, again....


 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter and RaggedGT

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Sep 14, 2017
#42
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #42
imp said:
Seems nowadays everything HAS to be aluminum. But you won't find any aluminum gears, just boxes to contain them. If only an iron T-5 box were available.

Yeah, engines are aluminum, too. With carefully placed gussets and strengthening shelves where lots of distortion is expected. But, NO aluminum crankshaft. Or other highly-stressed parts. Because aluminum stretches and bends easier than iron or steel. A hunk of steel, ANY steel, hard or soft, has a Modulus of Elasticity of 30 million psi; Aluminum is about 13 million. That means an aluminum part compared to a steel one will deflect 2-1/2 times as much as the steel one. For wearing purposes, only 1 or 2 types of aluminum alloy are suitable for bearing surfaces, Aluminum Bronze being one. I used it when making my live steam locomotive, for the pistons and valves. Here I go, off-thread, again....


Click to expand...
That is pretty freaking cool Imp.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,090
21,274
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 14, 2017
#43
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #43
Davedacarpainter said:
Am I mistaken about the supercharger, isn't it a twin screw (rotors)?
Click to expand...

Just saw this. Roots vs. Twin Screw

Both have rotors and most modern roots blowers have two rotors. So what's the difference?


Roots blowers compress the air charge against the walls of the case. The rotors actually "seal" against the case. These have rotors but you can't really call them screws. The air charge cushions the area between the rotors when it's at speed.






Twin Screw blowers are a little different. When they're in boost (if it's being driven even at idle, it's in boost), they touch nothing but air. The air itself compresses against the rotors and keeps them separated. The same air charge also keeps the rotors forcefully away from the blower case.


They have different efficiency ranges and provide boost better or worse than the other depending on how fast you spin them.

Roots blowers are generally better at lower RPM and lower boost ranges. Parasitic loss is relatively low.

Screw type blowers are better at higher boost pressures and volume. They have a bit more parasitic loss over their efficiency ranges than Roots blowers (generally, I don't want to argue semantics about blowers developed 20 years apart). They have to be moving pretty well and be pressurized to the point where the air barrier is keeping all of the internal parts separated (always enjoyed the sound of "clinking" of my twin screw during wind-down).


I'm sure I've forgotten some differences but those are the big ones.

Edited for typos
 
Last edited: Sep 14, 2017
Reactions: imp and RaggedGT

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Sep 14, 2017
#44
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #44
Noobz347 said:
Just saw this. Roots vs. Twin Screw

Both have rotors and most modern roots blowers have two rotors. So what's the difference?


Roots blowers compress the air charge against the walls of the case. The rotors actually "seal" against the case. These have rotors but you can't really call them screws. The air charge cushions the area between the rotors when it's at speed.






Twin Screw blowers are a little different. When they're in boost, they touch nothing but air. The air itself in compresses against the rotors and keeps them separated. The same air charge also keeps the rotors forcefully away from the blower case.


They have different efficiency ranges and provide boost better or worse than the other depending on how fast you spin them.

Roots blowers are generally better at lower RPM and lower boost ranges. Parasitic loss is relatively low.

Screw type blowers are better at higher boost pressures and volume. They have a bit more parasitic loss over their efficiency ranges than Roots blowers (generally, I don't want to argue semantics about blowers developed 20 years apart). They have to be moving pretty well and be pressurized to the point where the air barrier is keeping all of the internal parts separated (always loved the sound of "clinking" of my twin screw during wind-down).


I'm sure I've forgotten some differences but those are the big ones.
Click to expand...
So the M90 is definitely a roots blower then.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,090
21,274
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 14, 2017
#45
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #45
Davedacarpainter said:
So the M90 is definitely a roots blower then.
Click to expand...

Yes
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Sep 14, 2017
#46
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #46
Davedacarpainter said:
That is pretty freaking cool Imp.
Click to expand...
Thanks! It actually ran; I put down 750 feet of 7-1/2" gauge railbed.



My wife shot the pic from across the road, off the front porch of our farmhouse. This was in MO, 2009. Designing and building the beast took 7 years.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT and Davedacarpainter

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Sep 15, 2017
#47
  • Sep 15, 2017
  • #47
That took some work I bet!
 
Reactions: imp

droopie85gt

Hookers and Beer for life!
5 Year Member
Dec 26, 2016
1,028
818
153
Cordova, TN
Sep 15, 2017
#48
  • Sep 15, 2017
  • #48
Just working all the live long day I bet.
 
Reactions: imp and Davedacarpainter

Fordfreak93

Mustang Master
Mar 12, 2009
264
273
84
Mooresville, NC
Sep 20, 2017
#49
  • Sep 20, 2017
  • #49
I'm late to the party, but what else is new! I did the Z-spec gear swap when I had my T5 rebuilt. I had an OEM Z-spec input shaft and cluster gear that I had been saving and I bought 1st 2nd and 3rd gears off of Ebay. Only 3rd gear was OEM, but the other two passed inspection from my transmission guy. The OEM gears were being discontinued when I did this a few years ago, 2nd gear was nearly impossible to find. The ebay gears I bought were forged and I think they were made in India. I'm running 4.10 rear gears and I didn't want 1st gear to be completely useless. I still have all of the individual part numbers written down if you need them. I'll let you know how it turns out whenever I get it back together.
 
Reactions: imp and Davedacarpainter

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Sep 20, 2017
#50
  • Sep 20, 2017
  • #50
Fordfreak93 said:
I'm late to the party, but what else is new! I did the Z-spec gear swap when I had my T5 rebuilt. I had an OEM Z-spec input shaft and cluster gear that I had been saving and I bought 1st 2nd and 3rd gears off of Ebay. Only 3rd gear was OEM, but the other two passed inspection from my transmission guy. The OEM gears were being discontinued when I did this a few years ago, 2nd gear was nearly impossible to find. The ebay gears I bought were forged and I think they were made in India. I'm running 4.10 rear gears and I didn't want 1st gear to be completely useless. I still have all of the individual part numbers written down if you need them. I'll let you know how it turns out whenever I get it back together.
Click to expand...

I would need more than one can to get this job done......imp
 
Reactions: Fordfreak93
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
193
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
T
Newbie looking for some info on speedo gears
  • TDM389
  • Nov 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
242
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2025
TDM389
T
Drivetrain How much resistance, if any at all, is normal on a new 1st gear and synchro on a WC T5 transmission?
  • sleep-e
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
257
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
sleep-e
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
508
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?