• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

changing gears - 3.27 or 3.55?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrishicks
  • Start date Start date May 19, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Marshall

Founding Member
Nov 22, 2000
225
2
19
Qld Australia
May 24, 2005
#41
  • May 24, 2005
  • #41
Great to watch this debate........to get so many varied experiences from stang owners is a terrific thing for us who are far away from the big city action but are also considering a ratio swap.

we can now make a decision based on experience.

Thanx to all contributors.
 

TheFleshRocket

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
208
0
16
Southern Ill Annoy
Jul 27, 2005
#42
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #42
I assumed my '89 GT vert had 2.73 gears, because they were extremely tall--turning a good bit under 3000rpm at 100mph. So I picked up a set of used 3.27s and had them installed. Well lo and behold, my new gears felt exactly the same as the old ones.

So I checked, and I had 3.27s before the swap. Not only did I pay to have the gears replaced with the exact same gears, the new used gears have developed a clunk to them.

I'm ordering myself a set of 3.73s, brand new. I advise you to do the same.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#43
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #43
Too much debate going on here between 3.55 and 3.73. There is really very little difference there, not much of anything from a SOTP perspective anyway. So to serve the poster's concern about going too radical, maybe he should go with the 3.55 for purely phsychological reasons, because there really are NO performance reasons to make the distinction. Yes, in the long run he will clearly be better off with the 3.73 gears, but live and learn.

3.27 is just plain stupid, as pointed out amply well above. You just dont spend $500 for that kind of an inconsequential change. Stay away from the idiot who made that suggestion in the first place.
 
J

jeffs89gt

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
83
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#44
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #44
id say 3.55s. my $.02
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#45
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #45
5spd GT said:
I guess this thread shows who read the post and who didn't...

"my wife also drives the car"...

Go no more than the 355's...5.0Nostalgia said it well...
Click to expand...
I disagree. More aggressive gears are actually EASIER to drive. You can pull away from a stop or off a hill easier. Clutch engagement is smoother. And the difference in "rowing the gears" between 3.55 and 3.73 is nill.
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Jul 27, 2005
#46
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #46
whtpny said:
For what he is after than 3.55s will be great. People need to remember not all of us need the most perfreomance possible just an improvement over the sad 2.73 gears.
Click to expand...
xactly. I went from 273s to 355s, and the difference is amazing. Second gear burnouts anyone?
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jul 27, 2005
#47
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #47
i say 4.30s!




















j/k
3.55s
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 28, 2005
#48
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #48
GRGT1994 said:
I disagree. More aggressive gears are actually EASIER to drive. You can pull away from a stop or off a hill easier. Clutch engagement is smoother. And the difference in "rowing the gears" between 3.55 and 3.73 is nill.
Click to expand...

No not necessarily...the gas becomes much more touchy and cruise control is also affected in a negative light. To much fluctuation.

Their is a difference...I still say for this case...go no steeper than 3:55's.

Don't call anybody an idiot by the way...name calling ='s
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Jul 28, 2005
#49
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #49
my car does the rattle, shake, lurch thing too when i drive below 1500 rpms, is this normal, or whats going on

by the way... my vote goes to 3.55's

3000rpm gets me about 95 mph in 5th (estimated cuz my speedo only goes to 85 )
 

MeanMussy

Founding Member
May 25, 2000
581
0
17
Louisville, KY
Jul 28, 2005
#50
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #50
wife = 3.55
 

Fishhawk

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
281
0
0
Michigan City, Indiana
Jul 28, 2005
#51
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #51
notchback said:
crap another double post but hey....

i used to get 14.30's out of my old '88 w/ 5-speed and 2.73's on street tires and bone bone bone stock

so if you want to improve on your 15.xx's .....improve your driving and don't worry about the gears.

btw...not talking to you whtpny....just making a statement in general

performance + fuel economy = "not ever gonna happen"
Click to expand...
I run low 13's @ 104 with 3.55's and get 22 MPG. I say go with the 3.55's You'll notice a big difference from the 2.73's.
 

Fishhawk

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
281
0
0
Michigan City, Indiana
Jul 28, 2005
#52
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #52
Maryland Stang said:
I'm going to be the oddball here. My wife absolutely hates to drive my car because of it's lack of traction. She even hates it in the dry. 3.55s are going to make a traction problem even worse for you. 3.27s will give you more acceleration over 2.73s. Then there is also the issue of the speedo gear. 3.27 is as low as you can reliably go without tearing the tranny apart and changing the drive gear.

You guys need to remember that his wife will also be driving this car. The lower the gear the less likely it is that she'll wanna drive the car if she's anything like my wife.
Click to expand...
Tearing the tranny apart to change a speedo gear?????? All you do is pull the speedometer cable out of the trans and replace it with a new $5 plastic gear. Takes longer to jack the car up and put it on jack stands then it does to replace the gear.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jul 28, 2005
#53
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #53
I actually been thinking on and off about going down to 3.55's in my car. I had 3.08's stock. Went to 3.55's and then 3.73's within a few months. On my car I love 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th withthe 3.73's. They are fine. First is just too steep IMO. My other option is a Z-spec T5.

For you if it's 3.27 or 3.55, go 3.55.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jul 28, 2005
#54
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #54
I hear what everybody is saying and a few years back I would have agreed with 3.73-4.10's but I think 3.55's are perfect for a car that sees a lot of road miles. Whoever said that they run out of gear with 3.55's must have a 4spd....that's poppycock!!!! FYIoppycock is a funny word- as to not be insulting.....
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
240
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
2008 Mustang Bullitt stuck in Fifth gear
  • Jester67
  • Jul 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
398
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
Jester67
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
390
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
555
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
600
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?