• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Cheap Rack-in-pinion conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter sabersimon
  • Start date Start date May 13, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

unrealmach1

New Member
Dec 22, 2005
89
0
0
Detroit, MI
May 20, 2009
#21
  • May 20, 2009
  • #21
What about the Taurus rack conversion? I started to build one and I have the cradle almost finished. I have the rack and the tie rods, but I decided to go Unisteer. under $1200 for the kit with a new pump and well under$1000 for manual unisteer. Maval(Unisteer) has been the best company I have ever purchased from. Great customer service. I purchased the manual rack before the power rack came out and they took is back for full credit towards a power rack after a year. Great Tech support too.
 
H

htwheelz67

Member
May 18, 2007
444
0
16
mission viejo ca.
May 20, 2009
#22
  • May 20, 2009
  • #22
I've been looking at RNP but in my 67 vert I have a 408 stroker, rmp drop engine mounts and a canton oil pan so I'm sure none will bolt in, I've been looking at the ABS power brakes quick ratio power steering box, its based on a toyota corona/cressida power steering box, gets rid of the ram and control valve and has like a 13-14-1 ratio.

Anyone use one?
 
1

109jb

New Member
Apr 16, 2009
27
0
0
Morris, IL
May 20, 2009
#23
  • May 20, 2009
  • #23
dbfarr said:
I've got the Randall's rack, aside from the frame, centerlink, and the block that holds the centerlink, it looks almost exactly the same as the j car rack.

I have a bad bellows boot, lists on rockauto for ~$28, looks exactly the same. Hell, I could probably do a little homework and put a new rp into the cradle for ~$90...

I could be wrong, but it looks like most of the work in the kit is the cradle...

I think the next time I need one of these, I'll make a copy for myself.
Click to expand...

The randall's rack IS NOT THE SAME AS A J-CAR RACK. The attachment for the centerlink to the rack is on the back side of the rack on the randall's unit. On a J-car rack, the attachment is on the front side. BIG DIFFERENCE.
 
1

109jb

New Member
Apr 16, 2009
27
0
0
Morris, IL
May 20, 2009
#24
  • May 20, 2009
  • #24
unrealmach1 said:
What about the Taurus rack conversion? I started to build one and I have the cradle almost finished. I have the rack and the tie rods, but I decided to go Unisteer. under $1200 for the kit with a new pump and well under$1000 for manual unisteer. Maval(Unisteer) has been the best company I have ever purchased from. Great customer service. I purchased the manual rack before the power rack came out and they took is back for full credit towards a power rack after a year. Great Tech support too.
Click to expand...

From what I have been able to research, the Taurus rack will work, but you will lose a good amount of turning radius, much more than the J-car rack. Also, the distance between the two inner tie-rod ends on the Taurus rack is too far apart and will result in worse bump steer.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
May 20, 2009
#25
  • May 20, 2009
  • #25
109jb said:
The randall's rack IS NOT THE SAME AS A J-CAR RACK. The attachment for the centerlink to the rack is on the back side of the rack on the randall's unit. On a J-car rack, the attachment is on the front side. BIG DIFFERENCE.
Click to expand...



well actually you are right AND wrong. the Randalls rack is in fact a J-car rack, however they are specially modified J-car racks with the tie rod attachment point relocated from the front of the rack to the backside, otherwise it is a basic off the shelf J-car rack. i believe the unisteer rack uses basically the same modifications to their J-car rack too.
 
1

109jb

New Member
Apr 16, 2009
27
0
0
Morris, IL
May 20, 2009
#26
  • May 20, 2009
  • #26
bnickel said:
well actually you are right AND wrong. the Randalls rack is in fact a J-car rack, however they are specially modified J-car racks with the tie rod attachment point relocated from the front of the rack to the backside, otherwise it is a basic off the shelf J-car rack. i believe the unisteer rack uses basically the same modifications to their J-car rack too.
Click to expand...

The randall's rack is based on a J-car rack yes, but as soon as it is modified it is no longer a J-car rack and an off the shelf J-car rack won't work as a replacement. The rack body has a long narrow window in it under the bellows where the attachment of the centerlink travels. In order to attach the centerlink to the back side a similar window needs to be cut into the body on the back side. If you were to cut this window in a stock J-car rack you would significantly weaken the body, therefore you would also have to weld a cover on the original window to maintain the strength. Another option would be to make a custom body from a casting like the original. Either way, a J-car rack IS NOT a direct replacement for the randall's unit. Far from it.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
May 21, 2009
#27
  • May 21, 2009
  • #27
109jb said:
The randall's rack is based on a J-car rack yes, but as soon as it is modified it is no longer a J-car rack and an off the shelf J-car rack won't work as a replacement. The rack body has a long narrow window in it under the bellows where the attachment of the centerlink travels. In order to attach the centerlink to the back side a similar window needs to be cut into the body on the back side. If you were to cut this window in a stock J-car rack you would significantly weaken the body, therefore you would also have to weld a cover on the original window to maintain the strength. Another option would be to make a custom body from a casting like the original. Either way, a J-car rack IS NOT a direct replacement for the randall's unit. Far from it.
Click to expand...



i never said an off the shelf J-car rack was a direct replacement, however knowing what all is involved in modifying the J-car rack it wouldn't take too much to make an off the shelf replacement work just fine, yes it would cost a little more but still totally possible.

also, there are CV joint/rack and pinion/steering gear rebuilders in most good sized cities and even large towns that could rebuild the Randalls unit so long as the housing itself is still in good shape and they are usually cheaper than buying a rebuilt unit from the local parts store or at least don't cost much if any more anyway.
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
May 21, 2009
#28
  • May 21, 2009
  • #28
i designed a rack for my falcon after being disappointed with the TCP i put in my drag car, 65 mustang. I lost a little turning radius and i spent a lot. I believe its a great quality rack, best that you can buy and bolt in. I acutally gained a little weight as well. so that was disappointing.

but there is no OEM rack out there that will have the same travel as a stock mustang.

i decided to go with a Appleton or Woodward rack. Both are aluminum housings and any ratio is available. with a little bit of searching the racks can be found for around $400 (manual). that is cheap for an awesome rack. The actual racks on OEM are very small in comparison to one of these or woodwards/appleton. THe first TCP rack was a woodward rack and pinion. Now TCP just uses the Pinion and servo.

For my falcon, its going to be a handling car. I already custom designed and fabricated my suspension. i went with a manual stlye rack, here is a pic.
 

Attachments

  • steering.webp
    13.8 KB · Views: 1,183

dbfarr

Member
Sep 17, 2005
191
0
17
Boise ID
May 21, 2009
#29
  • May 21, 2009
  • #29
CraigMBA said:
With your Randals rack, how much turning radius did you lose compared to the stock unit?
Click to expand...

I'm not pulling any sharp u turns anymore, that's for sure....

so the loss in turning radius is slightly annoying, but not crippling.

I just have to plan for parking a little better.

It's just not a perfect world
 

dbfarr

Member
Sep 17, 2005
191
0
17
Boise ID
May 21, 2009
#30
  • May 21, 2009
  • #30
bnickel said:
i never said an off the shelf J-car rack was a direct replacement, however knowing what all is involved in modifying the J-car rack it wouldn't take too much to make an off the shelf replacement work just fine, yes it would cost a little more but still totally possible.

also, there are CV joint/rack and pinion/steering gear rebuilders in most good sized cities and even large towns that could rebuild the Randalls unit so long as the housing itself is still in good shape and they are usually cheaper than buying a rebuilt unit from the local parts store or at least don't cost much if any more anyway.
Click to expand...

I imagine, by the time I have a second project car, and am willing to build a cradle from 3/8 steel, machine a center link, build the offset block, and so on... modifying an R&p housing won't be too much more of a stretch.

Then again, by that time, 4 - 5 years, I imagine there will be a better solution.

Not that I am offended, I should have made myself clearer.

 
C

chanthemann

New Member
Aug 24, 2005
5
0
1
Jun 14, 2009
#31
  • Jun 14, 2009
  • #31
5280/4 said:
i designed a rack for my falcon after being disappointed with the TCP i put in my drag car, 65 mustang. I lost a little turning radius and i spent a lot. I believe its a great quality rack, best that you can buy and bolt in. I acutally gained a little weight as well. so that was disappointing.

but there is no OEM rack out there that will have the same travel as a stock mustang.

i decided to go with a Appleton or Woodward rack. Both are aluminum housings and any ratio is available. with a little bit of searching the racks can be found for around $400 (manual). that is cheap for an awesome rack. The actual racks on OEM are very small in comparison to one of these or woodwards/appleton. THe first TCP rack was a woodward rack and pinion. Now TCP just uses the Pinion and servo.

For my falcon, its going to be a handling car. I already custom designed and fabricated my suspension. i went with a manual stlye rack, here is a pic.
Click to expand...


You might want to re-think your design a bit since Appleton and Woodward circle track racks are front steer and your design looks like you plan to use the rack in a rear steer setup, like your original falcon suspension. It might work I guess, but when you turn your sterring wheel to the right, your car will go to the left! Hey, that might be fun. DO IT!
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jun 15, 2009
#32
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #32
chanthemann said:
You might want to re-think your design a bit since Appleton and Woodward circle track racks are front steer and your design looks like you plan to use the rack in a rear steer setup, like your original falcon suspension. It might work I guess, but when you turn your sterring wheel to the right, your car will go to the left! Hey, that might be fun. DO IT!
Click to expand...

Woodward offers a front mount right hand drive rack that can flipped over for left hand drive rear steer.
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jun 15, 2009
#33
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #33
thanks rhino9 at least someone knows whats available out there.

chanthemann,

I am new also, i see thats your first post, welcome. just wanted to let you know, I have already talked with engineers at these companies. they have a rack that will work for my set-up. I appreciate your concern.
 
P

prn

New Member
Jan 26, 2010
1
0
0
Jan 26, 2010
#34
  • Jan 26, 2010
  • #34
rack and pinion

how well did your set up work and were there any other problems? Do you have any more pictures?
 
J

jamison42166

Member
Jun 13, 2006
112
0
16
Jan 27, 2010
#35
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #35
chanthemann said:
It might work I guess, but when you turn your sterring wheel to the right, your car will go to the left! Hey, that might be fun. DO IT!
Click to expand...

Imagine the idiot who trys to steal that car lol
 
1

1992MustangGT

15 Year Member
Sep 6, 2008
166
14
19
Washington State
Feb 14, 2010
#36
  • Feb 14, 2010
  • #36
I'm interested in converting my 67 & 68 Cougars to rack and pinion steering and I've been doing alot of researching and reading threads like these trying to get an idea of which rack to use and so on. I read alot about guys using brand X style r&p setups on their Fords and even having to fabricate them to mount and function properly. My question is why doesn't anyone use a stock Ford rack when converting their classic Ford's suspension? What's wrong with using a 5.0 Mustang rack or a Mustang II rack or a number of different Ford racks? The rack in my 92 Mustang GT seems to function just fine without any issues. Why not use a factory Ford rack that you can get replacement parts for at your local parts store? Are they inferior to the Brand X racks? If so, what are the differences between the Fords and all the other Brand X racks? Someone educate me, please....
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Feb 14, 2010
#37
  • Feb 14, 2010
  • #37
It's a problem of rear-steer vs front-steer. If you used a fox-body rack the wheels would turn opposite of what you wanted.

That and rack travel play into it.
 
M

mroed

New Member
Feb 1, 2010
19
0
1
Feb 14, 2010
#38
  • Feb 14, 2010
  • #38
Here is a great link for you guys if you have a couple of hours to kill

Rack&pinion - Vintage Mustang Forums
 
M

mroed

New Member
Feb 1, 2010
19
0
1
Mar 12, 2010
#39
  • Mar 12, 2010
  • #39
Here is the cheapest complete rack&pinion I've seen... It's quite similar to the steeroids, but somewhat cheaper, any thoughts? I'm seriously considering it, don't think I dare making my own brackets etc to do my own j-car rack...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280474190521&_trksid=p2759.l1259
 
C

chanthemann

New Member
Aug 24, 2005
5
0
1
Mar 12, 2010
#40
  • Mar 12, 2010
  • #40
This is a copy of the Aeroform r&p (1967-68 Mustang Rack & Pinion Eleanor Steering with Chrome Column) and they even call themselves something close with "Aerosport". I don’t know if that is typo or what but I would find out before I slung any money their way. It could be the same kit, a copy, or just as good a kit if the pics are a true representation of both and it looks like that is a reputable seller. As far as a j-car based r&p goes, it seems to look as good as any and certainly cheaper than about all. I had a similar setup on my 68GT350 except I made my own billet aluminum brackets and billet aluminum inner tie rod mount instead of sheet metal ones. I took if off (will sell that stuff cheap) in favor of a front steer circle track rack (Appleton) with late model spindles (NOT like the cockamamy setup factory5 racing uses with their Cobra kit car). The taller spindles give me a better camber curve, a sealed wheel bearing, better brakes, and enough turning radius because of shorter steering arms, not to mention the advantages of a front steer rack anyway. I also do not have to deal with the instability of the center tie rod mount on the j-car rack setup. The front steer rack also gives me more header clearance for my 351c which is very limited with the j-car setup. The turning radius will ALWAYS be reduced with ANY j-rac rack and stock spindles, I don't care what anyone advertises. This is really not as big of a deal as most people make out of it tho, unless you are parallel parking your classic Mustang out on the streets everyday. CCR
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
72
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
116
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
C
Help identifying 8.8
  • Caden_H
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
634
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 12, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?