• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Check this video out ....omg challenger = boat hahah

  • Thread starter Thread starter newedgestang02
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
N

newedgestang02

New Member
May 5, 2008
1
0
0
Aug 21, 2008
#1
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #1
check this boat out... is that the skipper driving or is that giligan.. Damn our little 260hp gt's with intake and tune will beat this titianic remake!!!hahah

check this out!!

YouTube - Dodge Challenger SRT8 - Exclusive Performance Test
 
W

wohorsy2002

New Member
Apr 2, 2008
28
0
0
Aug 21, 2008
#2
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #2
Sorry but i would love to have one lol (plz dont tell nobody)
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 21, 2008
#3
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #3
its like the charger a boat lol. they look nice though i really like them. but they already have huge dealer mark ups on them. so i wouldnt buy one lol. actually in the proces of convincing the old man he needs a gt500kr or a c6 z06 lol.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Aug 21, 2008
#4
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #4
ha i cant wait to race one
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Aug 21, 2008
#5
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #5
LOL what a joke....40+K for a high 13 second car? I saw the auto version vs the GT500 in a magazine test. The GT500 totally RAPED the Challenger in every category from what I remember, performance wise.....yet the retards gave the win to the challenger due to it being new and "funner to drive" or something like that.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Aug 21, 2008
#6
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #6
hotmustang331 said:
LOL what a joke....40+K for a high 13 second car? I saw the auto version vs the GT500 in a magazine test. The GT500 totally RAPED the Challenger in every category from what I remember, performance wise.....yet the retards gave the win to the challenger due to it being new and "funner to drive" or something like that.
Click to expand...
The magazine should say "Brought to you by Dodge" on it
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Aug 21, 2008
#7
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #7
hotmustang331 said:
LOL what a joke....40+K for a high 13 second car? I saw the auto version vs the GT500 in a magazine test. The GT500 totally RAPED the Challenger in every category from what I remember, performance wise.....yet the retards gave the win to the challenger due to it being new and "funner to drive" or something like that.
Click to expand...
double post
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Aug 21, 2008
#8
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #8
I saw one at the track run 14.2 and 13.9x at like 101-102 the last time I was there.
/
Theyre garbage IMO.....425 hp and thats all they can pull?

Its a dodge though...what can you expect.
 

98E9GT

New Member
Dec 16, 2007
110
0
0
Aug 21, 2008
#9
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #9
I'd take one for a daily driver, and keep the pony in the garage.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Aug 21, 2008
#10
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #10
halarious

its a heavy overrated car. Not the first. In the end, its still a muscle car. Lose a little weight, get a set of drag radials on it, and Ill bet it will run with or outrun a stock 4.6 with drag radials. Look at the trap speed, not too many stock PI cars running 103mph. Also, if the runs were done in the daytime like the video shows, and its recent, chances are the entire run was in heat and humidity. It would be more beneficial to see what the problem is.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 21, 2008
#11
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #11
I'd still love to have one, only a six-speed though.

I have a feeling that car has more than a 13.8 in it though.

If not, it still looks, stops, and handles pretty damn good. Don't think there won't be an aftermarket for these cars that significantly increase the power output.
 
2

2000GTdriver

Member
May 27, 2004
47
0
6
Mile High City, Colorado
Aug 21, 2008
#12
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #12
Better get yours soon-I don't expect Chrysler to be in buisiness much longer. I saw that same magazine test and I must agree the Mustang spanked the Challenger. I must admit though that car looks good.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Aug 21, 2008
#13
  • Aug 21, 2008
  • #13
They are very nice looking but wow are cars just with gears would beat them.
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Aug 22, 2008
#14
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #14
kinda pathetic isnt it? all that hp and a 13.8? I would love to race one, I got a feeling my vortech will push me past one pretty quick.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Aug 22, 2008
#15
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #15
I think they weigh about 900 lbs more then are cars if I'm not mistaken.
 

tag4car

Member
Nov 21, 2005
0
0
16
Birmingham AL
Aug 22, 2008
#16
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #16
deftsound said:
ha i cant wait to race one
Click to expand...

for real on that

i was teasing behind a maroon one wednesday, they sit really high up in the back
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Aug 22, 2008
#17
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #17
Forget the acceleration... if they are so heavy they can only run a 14 with that much power, then imagine how badly they handle! It must be awful! Shame because it looks quite nice.
 

3ponyshow

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2002
319
1
18
Las Vegas
Aug 22, 2008
#18
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #18
Yes, it is a boat but so is everything else C/D makes. It was either build the car off the same chasis as the Magnum, 300 and Charger or don't build it at all. They just don't have the money.

Look at it this way though, when the new Camaro comes out, we'll be bitching at Ford for not giving us that kind of power out of the show room. In the meantime, these "boats" with mods are going to get their share of wins.

At the end of the day, every auto manufactorer that puts muscle on the street benefits us all.

That's what makes it an "era".
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 22, 2008
#19
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #19
I still think capable drivers will be able to better the 13.8 that Edmunds got.

Think about it, SRT-8 300's run a low 13, SRT-8 Chargers run lower 13's... This car isnt THAT different from them. I am sure it doesn't weigh more than the two I just mentioned.

The handling looked pretty flat and secure in the video, but i'd be interested to see what numbers it pulls on the skidpad.

119 feet 60-0 is good, no doubt about it.
 
K

Kelso Gringo

New Member
Dec 12, 2007
14
0
0
Aug 22, 2008
#20
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #20
I sure like the looks of the car, but it sure seems to corner like a large, heavy turd.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread Monkeybutt2000's 89 vert build thread- 408w build in progress
  • Monkeybutt2000
  • Apr 4, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
437
Views
68K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2026
2Blue2
78 V6 Turbo
  • jozsefsz
  • Sep 30, 2014
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
6K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 26, 2017
Little eddie
Pictures and Videos of the Brothers Performance May 5th Car Show
  • BrothersPerformance
  • May 9, 2012
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
966
Vendor Sponsor Forums May 9, 2012
BrothersPerformance
Upr's 2006 Mustang Gt Project
  • Sharad
  • Jun 8, 2012
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
2
Views
2K
Vendor Sponsor Forums Jun 14, 2012
Sharad
Video: Mustang beats Camaro and Challenger
  • MRaburn
  • Apr 6, 2010
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
911
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 7, 2010
adidas
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?